Using data from the Education Longitudinal Study, this study assessed the relevance of shadow education to the high academic performance of East Asian American students by examining how East Asian American students differed from other racial/ethnic students in the prevalence, purpose, and effects of using the two forms—commercial test preparation service and private one-to-one tutoring—of SAT coaching, defined as the American style of shadow education. East Asian American students were most likely to take a commercial SAT test preparation course for the enrichment purpose and benefited most from taking this particular form of SAT coaching. However, this was not the case for private SAT one-to-one tutoring. While black students were most likely to utilize private tutoring for the remedial purpose, the impact of private tutoring was trivial for all racial/ethnic groups, including East Asian American students. The authors discuss broader implications of the findings on racial/ethnic inequalities in educational achievement beyond the relevance of shadow education for the academic success of East Asian American students.
AlonSigalTiendaMarta. 2007. “Diversity, Opportunity, and the Shifting Meritocracy in Higher Education.” American Sociological Review72:487-511.
2.
AuriniJaniceDaviesScott. 2004. “The Transformation of Private Tutoring: Education in a Franchise Form.” Canadian Journal of Sociology29(3):419-38.
3.
BakerDavid P.AkibaMotokoLeTendreGerald K.WisemanAlexander W.2001. “Worldwide Shadow Education: Outside-school Learning, Institutional Quality of Schooling, and Cross-national Mathematics Achievement.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis1:1-17.
4.
BakerDavid P.LeTendreGerald K.2005. National Differences, Global Similarities: World Culture and the Future of Schooling. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5.
BeckerBetsy Jane. 1990. “Coaching for the Scholastic Aptitude Test: Further Synthesis and Appraisal.” Review of Educational Research60(3):373-417.
6.
BozickRobertLauffErich. 2007. Education Longitudinal Study of 2002 (ELS:2002): A First Look at the Initial Postsecondary Experiences of the Sophomore Class of 2002 (NCES 2008-308). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
7.
BrayMark. 1999. The Shadow Education System: Private Tutoring and Its Implications for Planners. Paris: IIEP-UNESCO.
8.
BrayMark. 2009. Confronting the Shadow Education System: What Government Policies for What Private Tutoring?Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.
9.
BrayMark. 2010. “Researching Shadow Education: Methodological Challenges and Directions.” Asia Pacific Education Review11:3-13.
10.
BrayMarkKwokPercy. 2003. “Demand for Private Supplementary Tutoring: Conceptual Considerations, and Socio-economic Patterns in Hong Kong.” Economics of Education Review22:611-20.
11.
BriggsDerek C. 2001. “The Effect of Admissions Test Preparation: Evidence from NELS:88.” Chance14(1):10-18.
12.
BuchmannClaudiaCondronDennisRoscignoVincent. 2010. “Shadow Education, American Style: Test Preparation, the SAT and College Enrollment.” Social Forces89(2):435-61.
13.
ByunSoo-yong. 2009. “Assessing the Effects of Shadow Education on Student Achievement in South Korea.” Paper presented at the workshop for The Contours of Korean Education: Educational Challenges of Recent Economic and Demographic Changes, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
14.
CummingsWilliam K. 1997. “Private Education in Eastern Asia.” Pp. 135-52 in The Challenge of Eastern Asian Education: Implications for America, edited by CummingsW. K.AltbachP. G.Albany: State University of New York Press.
15.
DaviesScottAuriniJanice. 2006. “The Franchising of Private Tutoring: A View from Canada.” The Phi Delta Kappan88(2):1123-128.
16.
DomingueBenBriggsDerek C.2009. “Using Linear Regression and Propensity Score Matching to Estimate the Effect of Coaching on the SAT.” Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints35(1):12-29.
DworkinA. Gary. 2005. “The No Child Left Behind Act: Accountability, High-stakes Testing, and Roles for Sociologists.” Sociology of Education78:170-74.
19.
FarkasGeorge. 1996. Human Capital or Cultural Capital: Ethnicity and Poverty Groups in an Urban School District. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
HansenBen B.2004. “Full Matching in an Observation Study of Coaching for the SAT.” Journal of the American Statistical Association99(467):609-18.
25.
HaoLingxinBonstead-BrunsMelissa. 1998. “Parent-child Differences in Educational Expectations and the Academic Achievement of Immigrant and Native Students.” Sociology of Education71(3):175-98.
HernandezJavier C.2009. “The Big Cram for Hunter High School.” The New York Times, January3. p. A13.
28.
HoEsther Sui-ChuWillmsJ. Douglas. 1996. “Effects of Parental Involvement on Eighth-grade Achievement.” Sociology of Education69:126-41.
29.
KaoGrace. 1995. “Asian Americans as Model Minorities? A Look at Their Academic Performance.” American Journal of Education103(2):121-59.
30.
KaoGrace. 2002. “Ethnic Differences in Parents’ Educational Aspirations.” Schooling and Social Capital in Diverse Cultures13:85-103.
31.
KaoGrace. 2004a. “Parental Influences on the Educational Outcomes of Immigrant Youth.” International Migration Review38(2):427-49.
32.
KaoGrace. 2004b. “Social Capital and Its Relevance to Minority and Immigrant Populations.” Sociology of Education77:172-83.
33.
KaoGraceRutherfordLindsay Taggart. 2007. “Does Social Capital Still Matter? Immigrant Minority Disadvantage in School-specific Social Capital and Its Effects on Academic Achievement.” Sociological Perspectives50(1):27-52.
34.
KaoGraceThompsonJennifer S.2003. “Racial and Ethnic Stratification in Educational Achievement and Attainment.” Annual Review of Sociology29:417-42.
35.
KaoGraceTiendaMarta. 1998. “Educational Aspirations of Minority Youth.” American Journal of Education106(3):349-84.
36.
Korea National Statistical Office. 2009. The Survey of Private Education Expenditures in 2008 (in Korean). Seoul: Korea National Statistical Office.
37.
KuanPing-Yin. 2008. “The Effect of Cram Schooling for Math: A Counterfactual Analysis.” Presented at the summer meeting of the Research Committee on Social Stratification and Mobility (RC 28), Stanford University, CA.
38.
LeeJaekyung. 2007. “Two Worlds of Private Tutoring: The Prevalence and Causes of After-school Mathematics Tutoring in Korea and the United States.” Teachers College Record109(5):1207-234.
39.
LeeChong JaeParkHyun-JungLeeHee-Sook. 2009. “Shadow Education Systems.” Pp. 901-19 in Handbook of Educational Policy Research, edited by SykesG.SchneiderB.PlankD. N.New York: Routledge.
40.
LeeSharon. 1994. “Poverty and the U.S. Asian Population.” Social Science Quarterly75:541-59.
MoriIzumiBakerDavid. 2010. “The Origin of Universal Shadow Education: What the Supplemental Education Phenomenon Tells Us about the Postmodern Institution of Education.” Asia Pacific Education Review11(1):36-48.
44.
ParkHyunjoonByunSoo-yongKimKyung-keun. 2011. “Parental Involvement and Students’ Cognitive Outcomes in Korea: Focusing on Private Tutoring.” Sociology of Education82(1):3-22.
45.
PongSuet-lingHaoLingxinGardnerErica. 2005. “The Role of Parenting Styles and Social Capital in the School Performance of Immigrant Asian and Hispanic Adolescents.” Social Science Quarterly86(4):928-50.
46.
PowersDonald E.RockDonald A.1999. “Effects of Coaching on SAT I: Reasoning Test Scores.” Journal of Educational Measurement36(2):93-118.
47.
RogersWilliam. 1993. “Regression Standard Errors in Clustered Samples.” Stata Technical Bulletin13:19-23.
48.
SchneiderBarbaraLeeYongsook. 1990. “A Model for Academic Success: The School and Home Environment of East Asian Students.” Anthropology & Education Quarterly21(4):358-77.
49.
ShrakeEunai. 2010. “Cram Schools.” Pp. 211-15 in Encyclopedia of Asian American Issues Today, Vol. 1, edited by ChenE. W.YooG. J.Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, LLC.
50.
SnyderThomas D.DillowSally A.2010. Digest of Education Statistics 2009 (NCES 2010-013). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved May 5, 2010(http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010013.pdf).
51.
StevensonDavid LeeBakerDavid P.1992. “Shadow Education and Allocation in Formal Schooling: Transition to University in Japan.” American Journal of Sociology97(6):1639-657.
52.
SunYongmin. 1998. “The Academic Success of East-Asian American Students—An Investment Model.” Social Science Research27:432-56.
53.
U.S. Department of Education. 1993. The National Study of Before- and After-school Programs: Analysis and Highlights. Retrieved January 6, 2011(http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED356043.pdf).
VenturaAlexandreJangSunhwa. 2010. “Private Tutoring through the Internet: Globalization and Offshoring.” Asia Pacific Education Review11:59-68.
56.
VigdorJacob L.ClotfelterCharles T.2003. “Retaking the SAT.” The Journal of Human Resources38:1-33.
57.
YamamotoYokoBrintonMary C.2010. “Cultural Capital in East Asian Educational Systems: The Case of Japan.” Sociology of Education83(1):67-83.
58.
ZhouMin. 2008. “The Ethnic System of Supplementary Education: Nonprofit and For-profit Institutions in Los Angeles’ Chinese Immigrant Community.” Pp. 229-51 in Toward Positive Youth Development: Transforming Schools and Community Programs, edited by ShinnM.YoshikawaH.New York: Oxford University Press.
59.
ZhouMinKimSusan S.2006. “Community Forces, Social Capital, and Educational Achievement: The Case of Supplementary Education in the Chinese and Korean Immigrant Communities.” Harvard Educational Review76:1-29.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
