Inter-Risk Framing Contests: The Politics of Issue Attention among Scandinavian Climate NGOs during the Coronavirus Pandemic

Abstract

In this article, we study the framing activities of Scandinavian climate-active non-governmental organizations (NGOs) during the early phases of the 2020 coronavirus pandemic. Building on theories of focusing events, crisis exploitation and Ulrich Beck’s global risks, we develop and apply the concept of inter-risk framing contests to the case. Empirically, we analyse all climate- and corona-related tweeting activity of a broad selection of green NGOs in Denmark (17 NGOs, 874 tweets), Norway (22 NGOs, 2575 tweets) and Sweden (15 NGOs, 920 tweets), respectively. Methodologically, we employ quantitative text analysis to map socio-symbolic constellations of NGO-term relations using principal component analysis, while complementing this via online ethnographic observation to increase interpretative validity. Overall, the analysis demonstrates similarities and differences in how green NGOs have variously responded to the ambiguous challenges and symbolic opportunities of the coronavirus event, in ways resonant with path-dependent dynamics of the three national green civil societies.

Keywords

climate change coronavirus pandemic inter-risk framing contests quali-quantitative methods social media data socio-symbolic constellations

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

(2010) Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies. Progress in Human Geography 34(6): 777–798.

Beck

(2006) Living in the world risk society. Economy and Society 35(3): 329–345.

Beck

(2010) Climate for change, or how to create a green modernity? Theory, Culture & Society 27(2–3): 254–266.

Beck

(2015) The cosmopolitan nation. Unpublished manuscript draft, in preparation for Metamorphosis (published 2016, London: Polity).

Benford

Snow

(2000) Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. American Review of Sociology 26: 611–639.

Birkland

(1998) Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting. Journal of Public Policy 18(1): 54–74.

Blach-Ørsten

Eberholst

Burkal

(2017) From hybrid media system to hybrid-media politicians: Danish politicians and their cross-media presence in the 2015 national election campaign. Journal of Information, Technology & Politics 14(4): 334–347.

Blok

Pedersen

(2014) Complementary social science? Quali-quantitative experiments in a Big Data world. Big Data & Society 1(2). DOI: 10.1177/2053951714543908.

Boin

‘t Hart

McConnell

(2009) Crisis exploitation: Political and policy impacts of framing contests. Journal of European Public Policy 16(1): 81–106.

10.

Dryzek

Downes

Hunold

, et al. (2003) Green States and Social Movements: Environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Norway. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

11.

Duit

(2016) The four faces of the environmental state: Environmental governance regimes in 28 countries. Environmental Politics 25(1): 69–91.

12.

Fellenor

Barnett

Potter

, et al. (2018) The social amplification of risk on Twitter: The case of ash dieback disease in the United Kingdom. Journal of Risk Research 21(10): 1163–1183.

13.

Fuhse

Stuhler

Riebling

, et al. (2020) Relating social and symbolic relations in quantitative text analysis. A study of parliamentary discourse in the Weimar Republic. Poetics 78: 101363.

14.

Gangaas

Kaltenborn

Andreassen

(2015) Environmental attitudes associated with large-scale cultural differences, not local environmental conflicts. Environmental Conservation 42(1): 41–50.

15.

Jamison

Baark

(1999) National shades of green: Comparing the Swedish and Danish styles in ecological modernization. Environmental Values 8(2): 199–218.

16.

Kozinets

(1998) On netnography: Initial reflections on consumer research investigations of cyberculture. In: Alba

Hutchinson

(eds) Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 25. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, pp.366–371.

17.

Kozinets

(2019) Netnography: The Essential Guide to Qualitative Social Media Research. London: SAGE.

18.

Lakoff

(2017) Unprepared. Global Health in a Time of Emergency. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.

19.

McComas

Shanahan

(1999) Telling stories about global climate change: Measuring the impact of narratives on issue cycles. Communication Research 26(1): 30–57.

20.

Moe

Larsson

(2013) Untangling a complex media system: A comparative study of Twitter-linking practices during three Scandinavian election campaigns. Information, Communication & Society 16(5): 775–794.

21.

Nyberg

Wright

Kirk

(2020) Fracking the future: The temporal portability of frames in political contests. Organization Studies 41(2): 175–196.

22.

Pearce

Özkula

Greene

, et al. (2020) Visual cross-platform analysis: Digital methods to research social media images. Information, Communication & Society 23(2): 161–180.

23.

Pescaroli

Alexander

(2018) Understanding compound, interconnected, interacting, and cascading risks: A holistic framework. Risk Analysis 38(11): 2245–2257.

24.

Steinberg

(2006) Acts of God: The Unnatural History of Natural Disaster in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.08 MB