Similar levels of inequality may be coded as acceptable or unacceptable in different places. To account for misrecognition of inequality, the existing studies highlight the roles of ideological legitimation and situated comparison through which individuals read inequality around them, but these accounts can be further elaborated upon. This article argues that it is neither the belief in ideology nor social comparison alone but rather the relationship between the two which shapes particular ways in which inequality is experienced. The dominant collective narratives rooted in macro-level contexts and individuals’ situated comparisons shape perceptions of the contradiction (or lack thereof) between how people think things should be and how things are in three specific ways. The proposed framework is put to use with interviews with 98 millennials in Japan and South Korea.
AbbottA (2016) Processual Sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2.
AsahinaY (2019) Insecure millennials: Coming of age in Seoul and Tokyo. PhD Thesis, The University of Hawaii at Manoa.
3.
BotteroW (2012) Who do you think they were? How family historians make sense of social position and inequality in the past. The British Journal of Sociology63(1): 54–74.
4.
BotteroW (2019) A Sense of Inequality. London and New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
5.
BourdieuP (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
BourdieuP (1989) Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory7(1): 14–25.
7.
BourdieuP (1998) Masculine Domination. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
BuccaM (2016) Merit and blame in unequal societies: Explaining Latin Americans’ beliefs about wealth and poverty. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility44: 98–112.
9.
Cabinet Office Government of Japan (2014) International survey of youth attitude 2013. Tokyo: Cabinet Office, Government of Japan.
10.
CechEABlair-LoyM (2010) Perceiving glass ceilings? Meritocratic versus structural explanations of gender inequality among women in science and technology. Social Problems57(3): 371–397.
11.
EvansMDRKelleyJ (2004) Subjective social location: Data from 21 nations. International Journal of Public Opinion Research16(1): 3–38.
12.
FriedmanSO’BrienDMcDonaldI (2021) Deflecting privilege: Class identity and the intergenerational self. Sociology55(4): 716–733.
13.
GamsonWA (1995) Constructing social protest. In: JohnstonH (ed.) Social Movements and Culture. Minnneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp.95–116.
14.
GarridoM (2018) How interspersion affects class relations. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research42(3): 442–460.
15.
GarridoM (2020) Democracy as disorder: Institutionalized sources of democratic ambivalence among the upper and middle class in manila. Social Forces99(3): 1036–1059.
16.
GijsbertsM (2002) The legitimation of income inequality in state-socialist and market societies. Acta Sociologica45(4): 269–285.
17.
HannumEIshidaHParkH, et al. (2019) Education in East Asian societies: Postwar expansion and the evolution of inequality. Annual Review of Sociology45: 625–647.
18.
HauserOPNortonMI (2017) (Mis)perceptions of inequality. Current Opinion in Psychology18: 21–25.
19.
HochschildJL (1981) What’s Fair? American Beliefs about Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
IrwinS (2015) Class and comparison: Subjective social location and lay experiences of constraint and mobility. The British Journal of Sociology66(2): 259–281.
21.
IrwinS (2018) Lay perceptions of inequality and social structure. Sociology52(2): 211–227.
22.
ISSP Research Group (2009) International social survey programme: social inequality IV. Cologne: GESIS Data Archive.
23.
JanmaatJG (2013) Subjective inequality: A review of international comparative studies on people’s views about inequality. European Journal of Sociology54(3): 357–389.
24.
KelleyJEvansMDR (1993) The legitimation of inequality: Occupational earnings in nine nations. American Journal of Sociology99(1): 75–125.
25.
KelleyJZagorskiK (2004) Economic change and the legitimation of inequality: The transition from socialism to the free market in central-east europe. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility22: 319–364.
26.
KluegelJRSmithER (1986) Beliefs about Inequality: Americans’ Views of What Is and What Ought to Be. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.
27.
KooH (2007) The Korean stratification system: Continuity and change. In: KimHSongB (eds) Modern Korean Society: Its Development and Prospect. Berkeley: UC Berkeley, Institute of East Asian Studies, pp.36–62.
28.
KwakJ (2018) Korea’s wage gap between big and medium size firms is bigger than that of developed countries [in Korean]. The Hankyoreh, 27November. Available at: http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/economy/economy_general/871966.html (accessed 10 April 2019).
29.
LamM (2004) The perception of inequalities: A gender case study. Sociology38(1): 5–23.
30.
LamontM (2000) The Dignity of Working Men: Morality and the Boundaries of Race, Class, and Immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
LamontM (2019) From ‘having’ to ‘being’: Self-worth and the current crisis of American society. British Journal of Sociology70(3): 660–707.
32.
LarsenCA (2016) How three narratives of modernity justify economic inequality. Acta Sociologica59(2): 93–111.
33.
LettDP (1998) In Pursuit of Status: The Making of South Korea’s ‘New’ Urban Middle Class. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center.
34.
LittlerJ (2017) Against Meritocracy: Culture, Power and Myths of Mobility. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
35.
MarxKEngelsF (1970) The German Ideology Part One. New York, NY: International Publishers Co.
36.
McAdamD (1982) Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37.
MeghjiASainiR (2018) Rationalising racial inequality: Ideology, hegemony and post-racialism among the black and south asian middle-classes. Sociology52(4): 671–687.
38.
MertonRK (2000) Social Theory and Social Structure. New York, NY: Free Press.
39.
MijsJ (2018) Inequality is a problem of inference: How people solve the social puzzle of unequal outcomes. Societies8(3): 64.
40.
MijsJ (2021) The paradox of inequality: Income inequality and belief in meritocracy go hand in hand. Socio-Economic Review19(1): 7–35.
41.
MilkmanR (2017) A new political generation: Millennials and the post-2008 wave of protest. American Sociological Review82(1): 1–31.
42.
MrozowickiATrappmannV (2020) Precarity as a biographical problem? Young workers living with precarity in Germany and Poland. Work, Employment and Society35(2): 221–238.
43.
OsbergLSmeedingT (2006) ‘Fair’ inequality? Attitudes toward pay differentials: The United States in comparative perspective. American Sociological Review71(3): 450–473.
44.
ParkH (2013) Re-Evaluating Education in Japan and Korea: Demystifying Stereotypes. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
45.
RagnarsdóttirBHBernburgJGÓlafsdóttirS (2013) The global financial crisis and individual distress: The role of subjective comparisons after the collapse of the Icelandic economy. Sociology47(4): 755–775.
46.
RaymoJMParkHXieY, et al. (2015) Marriage and family in East Asia: Continuity and change. Annual Review of Sociology41(1): 471–492.
47.
RoexKLHuijtsTSiebenI (2019) Attitudes towards income inequality: ‘Winners’ versus ‘losers’ of the perceived meritocracy. Acta Sociologica62(1): 47–63.
48.
RuncimanWG (1966) Relative Deprivation and Social Justice; a Study of Attitudes to Social Inequality in Twentieth-Century England. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
49.
SachwehP (2012) The moral economy of inequality: Popular views on income differentiation, poverty and wealth. Socio-Economic Review10(3): 419–445.
50.
ScottJC (1976) The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
51.
SheddC (2015) Unequal City: Race, Schools, and Perceptions of Injustice. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
52.
SilvaJM (2013) Coming Up Short: Working-Class Adulthood in an Age of Uncertainty. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
53.
SongJ (2014) Inequality in the Workplace: Labor Market Reform in Japan and Korea. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
54.
SvallforsS (2006) The Moral Economy of Class: Class and Attitudes in Comparative Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
55.
ThompsonEP (1971) The moral economy of the English crowd in the eighteenth century. Past and Present50(1): 76–136.
56.
WhyteMK (2010) Myth of the Social Volcano: Perceptions of Inequality and Distributive Injustice in Contemporary China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
57.
YoungAA (2011) The Minds of Marginalized Black Men: Making Sense of Mobility, Opportunity, and Future Life Chances. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58.
YurchakA (2005) Everything Was Forever, Until It Was No More: The Last Soviet Generation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
