This article explores the paradox between Pope Francis’s success as a critic of global markets and the limitations of his religious capital in his home country of Argentina. While for some observers it might be obvious that the pope can influence people’s thinking about social and political matters, the findings of this article highlight the role of ‘non-specialist’, ordinary believers in setting limits to Francis’s religious power. Using Bourdieusian theory and a ‘lived religion’ methodological approach, I explore the agency of ordinary believers in the religious field. By studying the limits regular believers established to the efficacy of Pope Francis’s religious capital, we better understand how the agency of non-specialists operates in the religious field. This research is based on a non-random sample of semi-structured, in-depth interviews of 42 lower socioeconomic status interviewees, self-identified as Catholics, Evangelicals, Others and Non-Affiliated; conducted in Córdoba, Argentina from November 2015 to December 2016.
AmeigeirasA (2008) Religiosidad popular: Creencias religiosas populares en la sociedad argentina. Buenos Aires: Biblioteca Nacional – Universidad Nacional General Sarmiento.
3.
AmmermanN (2014) Sacred Stories, Spiritual Tribes: Finding Religion in Everyday Life. New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
BeltránW (2010) La teoría del mercado en el estudio de la pluralización religiosa. Revista Colombiana de Sociología33(2): 41–62.
5.
BourdieuP (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
BourdieuP (1990) The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7.
BourdieuP (1991) Genesis and structure of the religious field. Comparative Social Research13(1): 1–44.
8.
BourdieuP (1993) Sociology in Question. London: SAGE.
9.
BourdieuPDe Saint MartinM (1982) La sainte famille: L’episcopat francais dans le champ de pouvoir. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales44/45: 2–53.
10.
BourdieuPWacquantL (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
11.
BurawoyM (2015) Facing an unequal world. Current Sociology63(1): 5–34.
12.
CudaE (2016) Para leer a Francisco: Teología, ética y política. Buenos Aires: Manantial.
13.
De la TorreRMartínE (2016) Religious studies in Latin America. Annual Review of Sociology42: 473–492.
14.
DianteillE (2003) Pierre Bourdieu and the sociology of religion: A central and peripheral concern. Theory and Society32(5/6): 529–549.
15.
DillonM (2003) Pierre Bourdieu, religion, and cultural production. Cultural Studies/Critical Methodologies1: 411–429.
16.
DiStefanoRZanattaL (2009) Historia de la Iglesia Argentina. Buenos Aires: Ed. Sudamericana.
17.
EspinosaM (2010) Pierre Bourdieu y el hecho social religioso: Análisis de su obra y apropiaciones desde el trabajo histórico y etnográfico. Trabajo y Sociedad15(14): 131–142.
18.
FinkeRDoughertyK (2002) The effects of professional training: The social and religious capital acquired in seminaries. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion41(1): 103–120.
19.
Francis (2015) Encyclical Letter Laudato Si. Vatican: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.
GlasmanM (2015) Beloved of the people: The popularity and political mastery of Pope Francis. Juncture21(4): 319–323.
22.
IannacconeL (1990) Religious practice: A human capital approach. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion29(3): 297–314.
23.
IvereighA (1995) Catholicism and Politics in Argentina 1810–1960. London: St Martin’s Press.
24.
LahsenMDominguesJ (2015) Pope Francis’ environmental encyclical in Latin America: Mutual influences. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development57(6): 20–23.
25.
Latinobarómetro (2015) La confianza en América Latina 1995–2015: 20 años de opinión pública latinoamericana. Santiago de Chile: Banco de datos en linea. Available at: www.latinobarometro.org (accessed 5 September 2017).
26.
LevineD (2012) Politics, Religion and Society in Latin America. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
27.
LevineD (2014) The Francis effect. Americas QuarterlyFall: 1–4.
McGuireM (2008) Lived Religion: Faith and Practice in Everyday Life. New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
McKinnonA (2017) Religion and social class: Theory and method after Bourdieu. Sociological Research Online22(1): 13.
31.
McKinnonATrzebiatowskaMBrittainC (2011) Bourdieu, capital, and conflict in a religious field: The case of the ‘homosexuality’ conflict in the Anglican communion. Journal of Contemporary Religion26(3): 355–370.
32.
MallimaciFEsquivelJGiménez BeliveauV (2015) What do Argentine people believe in? Religion and Social structure in Argentina. Social Compass62(2): 255–277.
33.
MartínE (2009) From popular religion to practices of sacralization: Approaches for a conceptual discussion. Social Compass56(2): 273–285.
34.
MartínE (2017) God is Argentine and so is the pope! Catholicism, popular culture and the national imagination. In: MichelPPossamaiATurnerB (eds) Religions, Nations, and Transnationalism in Multiple Modernities. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 175–195.
35.
MartínezA (2011) En torno a la noción de campo religioso: Categorías para estudiar religión y política en América Latina. XVI Jornadas sobre Alternativas Religiosas en América Latina. Punta del Este: ASCRMS: 1–9.
36.
MorelloG (2015) The Catholic Church and Argentina’s Dirty War. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
MorelloGRomeroCRabbiaH, et al. (2017) An enchanted modernity: Making sense of Latin America’s religious landscape. Critical Research on Religion5(3): 308–326.
38.
OrsiR (1997) Everyday miracles: The study of lived religion. In HallD (ed.) Lived Religion in America: Toward a History of Practice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 3–21.
39.
Pew Research Center (2014a) Religion in Latin America: Widespread change in a historically Catholic region. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
40.
Pew Research Center (2014b) Pope Francis’ image positive in much of the world. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
41.
ReyT (1998) The Virgin Mary and revolution in Saint-Domingue: The charisma of Romaine-la-Prophétesse. Journal of Historical Sociology11(3): 341–369.
42.
ReyT (2014) Bourdieu on Religion: Imposing Faith and Legitimacy. New York: Routledge.
SemánP (1997) Religión y cultura popular en la ambigua modernidad Latinoamericana. Nueva Sociedad149: 130–145.
45.
StarkRFinkeR (2000) Acts of Faith. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
46.
SuárezA (2015) Creer en las villas. Buenos Aires: Editorial Biblos.
47.
SwartzD (1996) Bridging the study of culture and religion: Pierre Bourdieu’s political economy of symbolic power. Sociology of Religion57(1): 71–85.
48.
ToddA (2015) Religion, security, rights, the individual and rates of exchange: Religion in negotiation with British public policy in prisons and the military. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society28: 37–50.
49.
UrbanH (2003) Sacred capital: Pierre Bourdieu and the study of religion. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion15(4): 354–389.
50.
VásquezM (2011) More than Belief: A Materialist Theory of Religion. New York: Oxford University Press.
51.
VerterB (2003) Spiritual capital: Theorizing religion with Bourdieu against Bourdieu. Sociological Theory21(2): 150–174.
52.
WildeM (2004) How culture mattered at Vatican II: Collegiality trumps authority in the Council’s social. American Sociological Review69(4): 576–602.
53.
WuthnowR (2002) Religious involvement and status: Bridging social capital. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion41(4): 669–684.
54.
WuthnowR (2003) Overcoming status distinctions? Religious involvement, social class, race, and ethnicity in friendship patterns. Sociology of Religion64(4): 423–442.
