The article draws on data from a national survey in Australia in 2014 to examine how social networks affect life satisfaction and happiness. Findings show that social network composition, social attachment, perceived social support and the volume of social resources are significantly positively associated with life satisfaction and happiness. Stress about social commitments, feeling restricted by social demands and being excluded by a social group are negatively associated with life satisfaction and happiness. These results indicate that social networks have both ‘bright side’ and ‘dark side’ effects on subjective wellbeing.
BaffourBHaynesMWesternMet al. (2016) Weighting strategies for combining data from dual-frame telephone surveys: Emerging evidence from Australia. Journal of Official Statistics32(3): 549–578.
2.
BeckerGS (1991) A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
BianY (1997) Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China. American Sociological Review62: 266–285.
4.
BianYHuangX (2009) Network resources and job mobility in China’s transitional economy. In: KeisterL (ed.) Research in the Sociology of Work, Volume 19. Bingley: Emerald Books, 255–282.
5.
BianYLiY (2000) Social network capital of the Chinese family. Tsinghua Sociological Review2: 1–18.
6.
BianYHaoMLiY (2017) Social networks and subjective well-being: A comparison of Australia, Britain, and China. Journal of Happiness Studies. Epub ahead of print 1November2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902–017–9926–2.
7.
BianYHuangXZhangL (2015) Information and favoritism: The network effect on wage income in China. Social Networks40: 129–138.
8.
BourdieuP (1986) The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJ (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood, 241–258.
9.
BrickmanPCampbellD (1971) Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In: ApleyMH (ed.) Adaptation Level Theory. New York: Academic Press, 287–302.
10.
BurtR (1984) Network items and the General Social Survey. Social Networks6: 293–339.
11.
BurtR (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
ChristakisNFowlerJ (2009) Connected: The Surprising Power of Our Social Networks and How They Shape Our Lives. New York: Little, Brown and Company.
13.
ClarkAEGeorgellisYLucasREet al. (2004) Unemployment alters the set point for life satisfaction. Psychological Science15: 8–13.
14.
ColemanJS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology94: 95–120.
15.
DavernMCumminsRStokesM (2007) Subjective wellbeing as an affective-cognitive construct. Journal of Happiness Studies8: 429–449.
16.
DienerE (2006) Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. Journal of Happiness Studies7: 397–404.
17.
DienerEEmmonsRALarsenRJet al. (1985) The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment49: 71–75.
18.
DolanPPeasgoodTWhiteM (2008) Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology29: 94–122.
19.
DurlaufSFafchampsM (2005) Social capital. In: AghionPDurlaufS (eds) Handbook of Economic Growth, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1639–1699.
20.
EllisonNSteinfieldCLampeC (2007) The benefits of Facebook ‘friends’: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12: 1143–1168.
21.
FordyceM (1977) Development of a program to increase personal happiness. Journal of Counselling Psychology24: 511–520.
22.
FoxJMorelandJ (2015) The dark side of social networking sites: An exploration of the relational and psychological stressors associated with Facebook use and affordances. Computers in Human Behavior45: 168–176.
23.
FurstenbergFHughesM (1995) Social capital and successful development among at-risk youth. Journal of Marriage and the Family57: 580–592.
24.
GoldTGuthrieDWankD (2002) Social Connections in China: Institutions, Culture, and the Changing Nature of Guanxi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
GottmanJM (1996) What Predicts Divorce? The Relationship between Marital Processes and Marital Outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
GranovetterM (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78: 1360–1380.
27.
GranovetterM (1995) Afterword 1994: Reconsiderations and a new agenda. In: Getting a Job. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 139–182.
28.
HaganJMcCarthyB (1995) Getting into street crime: The structure and process of criminal embeddedness. Social Science Research24: 63–95.
29.
HaganJMacMillanRWheatonB (1996) New kid in town: Social capital and the life course effects of family migration on children. American Sociological Review61: 368–385.
30.
HaubererJ (2011) Social Capital Theory: Towards a Methodological Foundation. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH.
31.
HeadeyB (2007) The set-point theory of wellbeing needs replacing – on the brink of a scientific revolution? Discussion Paper 753, German Institute for Economic Research, Berlin.
32.
HelliwellJF (2006) Wellbeing, social capital and public policy: What’s new?Economic Journal116(510): C34–C45.
33.
HelliwellJFPutnamR (2004) The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society359(1449): 1435–1446.
34.
HonnethA (1996) The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35.
HuangXWesternM (2011) Social networks and occupational attainment in Australia. Sociology45(2): 269–286.
36.
HuangXWesternM (2015) Social capital and life satisfaction in Australia. In: LiY (ed.) The Handbook of Research Methods and Applications on Social Capital. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 225–241.
37.
HuxholdOFioriKWindsorT (2013) The dynamic interplay of social network characteristics, subjective well-being, and health: The costs and benefits of socio-emotional selectivity. Psychology and Aging28(1): 3–16.
38.
KadushinC (2012) Understanding Social Networks: Theories, Concepts, and Findings. New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
KimJLeeJ (2011) The Facebook paths to happiness: Effects of the number of Facebook friends and self-presentation on subjective well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking14(6): 359–364.
40.
KrossEVerduynPDemiralpEet al. (2013) Facebook use predicts declines in subjective well-being in young adults. PLoS ONE8(8): e69841.
41.
LabiancaGBrassD (2006) Exploring the social ledger: Negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Academy of Management Review31(3): 596–614.
42.
LiY (2016) Social mobility, social network and subjective wellbeing in the UK. Contemporary Social Research11(2–3): 222–237.
43.
LiYPicklesASavageM (2005) Social capital and social trust in Britain. European Sociological Review21(2): 109–123.
44.
LiYSavageMWardeA (2008) Social mobility and social capital in contemporary Britain. British Journal of Sociology59(3): 391–411.
45.
LinN (2001) Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
LyonsR (2011) The spread of evidence-poor medicine via flawed social-network analysis. Statistics, Politics, and Policy2(1): Article 2.
47.
McMillanJBeavisAJonesF (2009) The AUSEI06: A new socioeconomic index for Australia. Journal of Sociology45: 123–149.
48.
McPhersonMSmith-LovinLBrashearsME (2006) Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review71: 353–375.
49.
ManfredaKLBosnjakMBerzelakJet al. (2008) Web surveys versus other survey modes: A meta-analysis comparing response rates. International Journal of Market Research50: 79–104.
50.
MarsdenP (1987) Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review52: 122–131.
51.
MillarMDillmanDA (2011) Improving response to web and mixed-mode surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly75: 249–269.
52.
PortelaMNeiraISalinas-JimenezM (2013) Social capital and subjective wellbeing in Europe: A new approach on social capital. Social Indicators Research114: 493–511.
53.
PortesA (1998) Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology24: 1–24.
54.
PutnamR (2000) Bowling Alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.
55.
RobinsG (2015) Doing Social Network Research: Network-Based Research Design for Social Scientists. London: SAGE.
56.
ScottJ (2017) Social Network Analysis. London: SAGE.
57.
ValenzuelaSParkNKeeK (2009) Is there social capital in a social network site? Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication14: 875–901.
58.
Van Der GaagMSnijdersT (2005) The resource generator: Social capital quantification with concrete items. Social Networks27: 1–29.
59.
WesternM (1991) Class structure and demographic class formation. In: BaxterJEmmisonJWesternJet al. (eds) Class Analysis and Contemporary Australia. Melbourne: Macmillan, 166–201.
60.
WesternMTomaszewskiW (2016) Subjective wellbeing, objective wellbeing and inequality in Australia. PLoS ONE11(10): e0163345.
61.
WesternMHuangXBianYet al. (2016a) National Survey on Social Networks and Subjective Wellbeing in Australia (AuSNet Survey), 2014. Computer file, Institute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland.
62.
WesternMHuangXHuangYet al. (2016b) Technical report for the National Survey on Social Networks and Subjective Wellbeing in Australia (AuSNet Survey 2014), 2013–2016. Institute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland.
63.
WilkinsonR (2002) Liberty, fraternity, equality. International Journal of Epidemiology31: 538–543.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
