We tested the hypothesis that the relationship between social class measured according to employment relations and conditions and quality of life in older people was due to the influence of social class on the perception individuals had about their place in a social hierarchy. We used the data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) in which both an occupation-based measure, the National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification (NS-SEC) and a subjective measure of social status (SSS) were included. Quality of life was measured using a 19-item Likert-scaled questionnaire (CASP-19). We found that even in the employed, SSS explained quality of life better than NS-SEC. The path analysis revealed that the effects of most NS-SEC categories on quality of life were fully mediated by SSS. The effect of SSS on quality of life was independent of advantageous occupational conditions, favourable life circumstances or mental health.
AdlerNEpelESCastellazzoGIckovicsJR (2000) Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychology19: 586–92.
AkaikeH (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: PetrovBNCaskiF (eds) Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Information Theory. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado, 267–81.
4.
BlaneDNetuveliGBartleyM (2007) Does quality of life at older ages vary with socio-economic position?Sociology41(4): 717–26.
5.
CoxonAPMFisherK (2003) Criterion validation and occupational classification: The seven economic relations and the NS-SEC. In: RoseDPevalinD (eds) A Researchers’ Guide to the National Statistics Socio-economic Classification. London: Sage.
6.
DemakakosPNazrooJBreezeEMarmotM (2008) Socioeconomic status and health: The role of subjective social status. Social Science & Medicine67: 330–40.
7.
DodgeYYadegariI (2009) On direction of dependence. Metrika72: 139–50.
8.
EvansGMillsC (1998) Identifying class structure: A latent class analysis of the criterion-related and construct validity of the Goldthorpe class schema. European Sociological Review14: 87–106.
9.
FranziniLFernandez-EsquerME (2006) The association of subjective social status and health in low-income Mexican-origin individuals in Texas. Social Science & Medicine63: 788–804.
10.
GoodmanEAdlerNEKawachiIFrazierALHuangBColditzGA (2001) Adolescents’ perceptions of social status: Development and evaluation of a new indicator. Pediatrics108(2): E31.
11.
HuPFAdlerNEGoldmanNWeinsteinMSeemanTE (2005) Relationship between subjective social status and measures of health in older Taiwanese persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society53: 483–8.
12.
HydeMWigginsRHiggsPBlaneD (2003) A measure of quality of life in early old age: The theory, development and properties of a needs satisfaction model (CASP-19). Aging and Mental Health7: 186–94.
13.
JackmanMR (1979) The subjective meaning of social class identification in the United States. The Public Opinion Quarterly43: 443–462.
14.
KahnemanDTverskyA (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica47: 263–91.
15.
LundbergJKristensonM (2008) Is subjective status influenced by psychosocial factors?Social Indicators Research89: 375–90.
16.
MarmotMBanksJBlundellRLessofCNazrooJ (eds) (2003) Health, Wealth and Lifestyles of the Older Population in England: The 2002 English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. London: Institute of Fiscal Studies.
17.
MillsCEvansG (2003) Employment relations, employment conditions and the NS-SEC. In: RoseDPevalinD (eds) A Researchers’ Guide to the National Statistics Socio-economic Classification. London: Sage.
18.
OstroveJMAdlerNEKuppermannMWashingtonAE (2000) Objective and subjective assessments of socioeconomic status and their relationship to self-rated health in an ethnically diverse sample of pregnant women. Health Psychology19: 613–18.
19.
RoseD (1999) Commentary: Once more into the breach: In defence of class anaysis yet again. Work, Employment and Society12: 755–6.
20.
RoseDPevalinD (eds) (2003) A Researcher’s Guide to the National Statistics Socio-economic Classification. London: Sage.
21.
Singh-ManouxAAdlerAEMarmoMG (2003) Subjective social status: Its determinants and its association with measures of ill-health in the Whitehall II study. Social Science & Medicine56: 1321–33.
22.
Singh-ManouxAMarmotMGAdlerNE (2005) Does subjective social status predict health and change in health status better than objective status?Psychosomatic Medicine67: 855–61.
23.
SteffickDE (2000) Documentation of Affective Functioning Measures in the Health and Retirement Study. Ann Arbor, MI: HRS Health Working Group.
