Our dependence on energy from fossil fuels is causing potentially disastrous global warming and posing fundamental questions about the commensurability of consumer capitalism and a sustainable society. UK and Scottish governments have taken a lead in climate change legislation intended to avoid worst-case scenarios through low carbon transition. There are, however, considerable uncertainties about whether individualized, market-driven, materialistic societies can manage such radical transformations. Policies to cut household emissions focus on behaviour change through social marketing and incremental modifications to consumption. This technocratic model produces very little societal change, and seems likely to be self-defeating. The framing of the problem as one of behavioural adjustments to individual self-interest obscures alternative understandings of society as a collective accomplishment. Through simultaneous ‘knowing and not knowing’ about unsustainable consumerism, a behavioural model allows governing to proceed, while marginalizing awkward questions about the contradictions between economic growth and low carbon transitions.
BaumanZ (1999) Work, Consumerism and the New Poor. Buckingham: Open University Press.
4.
BeckU (2010) Climate for change, or how to create a green modernity?Theory, Culture and Society27: 254–66.
5.
CohenS (2001) States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering. Cambridge: Polity.
6.
DavidsonSMartinCTreanorS (2009) Scottish Environmental Attitudes and Behaviours Survey 2008. Edinburgh: Scottish Government Social Research/Ipsos MORI.
7.
DavisSJCaldeiraKMatthewsHD (2010) Future CO2 emissions and climate change from existing energy infrastructure. Science329: 1330–3.
8.
Defra (2005) Securing the Future: UK Government Sustainable Development Strategy. London: Defra.
9.
Defra (2006) An Environmental Behaviours Strategy for Defra – Scoping Report. London: Defra.
10.
Defra (2007) Citizens’ Summit on Climate Change. London: Defra.
11.
Defra (2008) A Framework for Pro-environmental Behaviours. London: Defra.
DiamondJ (2005) Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Survive. Harmondsworth: Allen Lane Penguin.
14.
DresnerSMcGeevorKTomeiJ (2007) Public Understanding Synthesis Report: A Report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. London: Policy Studies Institute/Defra.
FlynnRBellabyPRicciM (2010) The ‘value-action gap’ in public attitudes towards sustainable energy: The case of hydrogen energy. In: CarterBCharlesN (eds) Society, Nature and Sociology. Sociological Review Monographs. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
17.
GiddensA (2009) The Politics of Climate Change. Cambridge: Polity.
18.
HandMShoveESouthertonD (2005) Explaining showering: A discussion of the material, conventional, and temporal dimensions of practice. Sociological Research Online. Available at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/10/2/hand.html
19.
HarveyD (2005) A Brief History of Neo-liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
HulmeM (2009) Why We Disagree about Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
IPCC (International Panel on Climate Change) (2007)Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contributions of Working Group 1 to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
JacksonT (2009) Prosperity without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet. London: Earthscan.
25.
LatourBWoolgarS (1979) Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. London: Sage.
26.
LorenzoniINicholson-ColebSWhitmarshL (2007) Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public, and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change17: 445–59.
27.
LeiserowitzAMaibachERoser-RenoufCSmithN (2010) Global Warming’s Six Americas, June 2010. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change.
28.
MillerPRoseN (1990) Governing economic life. Economy and Society19: 1–31.
29.
MillerPRoseN (2008) Governing the Present. Cambridge: Polity.
30.
OwenLBramleyHTocockJ (2009) Public Understanding of Sustainable Water Use in the Home: A Report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. London: Synovate/Defra.
31.
PidgeonNLorenzoniIPoortingaW (2008) Climate change or nuclear power – no thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain. Global Environmental Change18: 69–85.
32.
PrinsGGalianaIGreenC. (2010) A New Direction for Climate Policy after the Crash of 2009. The Hartwell Paper. London: University of Oxford and LSE.
33.
RussellSLuxC (2009) Getting over yuck: moving from psychological to cultural and sociotechnical analyses of responses to water recycling. Water Policy1: 21–35.
34.
RutlandTAylettA (2008) The work of policy: actor networks, governmentality, and local action on climate change in Portland, Oregon. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space26: 627–46.
35.
SandelM (2009) Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do?Harmondsworth: Allen Lane Penguin.
ShoveEWatsonMIngramJ (2007) Products and practices: selected concepts from science and technology studies and from social theories of consumption and practice. Design Issues23: 3–16.
SmithJSchneiderSOppenheimerM. (2009) Assessing dangerous climate change through an update of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): ‘Reasons for concern’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences106: 4133–7.
43.
StiglitzJ (2010) Freefall: America, Free Markets and the Sinking of the World Economy. Harmondsworth: Allen Lane Penguin.
44.
Stoll-KleemannSO’RiordanTJaegerC (2001) The psychology of denial concerning climate mitigation measures: evidence from Swiss focus groups. Global Environmental Change11: 107–17.
45.
ThalerRSunsteinC (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
46.
ThøgersenJCromptonT (2009) Simple and painless? The limitations of spillover in environmental campaigning. Journal of Consumer Policy32: 141–63.
UNHDR (United Nations Human Development Report) (2007/8) Fighting Climate Change: Human Solidarity in a Divided World. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
50.
UphamPWhitmarshLPoortingaWPurdamKDevine-WrightP (2009) Public Attitudes to Environmental Change – A Selective Review of Theory and Practice. Report for ESRC/LWEC. Manchester: ESRC.
51.
UrryJ (2010) Consuming the planet to excess. Theory, Culture and Society27: 191–212.
52.
WebbJ (2010) Society matters: changing environmental attitudes and behaviour in Scotland. Scottish Affairs71: 30–62.
53.
WhileAJonasAGibbsD (2010) From sustainable development to carbon control: eco-state restructuring and the politics of urban and regional development. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers35: 76–93.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
