Based on in-depth interviews with 24 working couples who hire domestic helpers in Hong Kong, this article examines the hiring of help as an instance of unequal social exchange in which mothers are expected to give up more than fathers. Men view hiring help as a contractual service and as a ‘gift’ to their wives that allows them to ‘buy out’ of housework and childcare. Women, however, are likely to supplement their helper’s contributions with their own labour since they view hired help as ‘less-than-optimal’ childcare. They also feel responsible for the supervision and emotional needs of their helpers by treating them as ‘part of the family’. By examining the gendered meanings attached to paid domestic help, we show how men and women reproduce the traditional division of labour in the home when hiring domestic helpers, rather than relieving the tensions that working mothers face between paid employment and childcare.
AronsonJ (1992) Women’s Sense of Responsibility for the Care of Old People: ‘But Who Else is Going to Do It?’Gender & Society6(1): 8–29.
2.
BearmanP (2005) Doormen (Fieldwork Encounters and Discoveries). Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
3.
BrinesJ (1994) Economic Dependency, Gender, and the Division of Labour. American Journal of Sociology100(3): 652–88.
4.
ChanA (2005) Live-in Foreign Domestic Workers and their Impact on Hong Kong’s Middle Class Families. Journal of Family and Economic Issues26(4): 509–528.
5.
ChangKGrovesJ (2000) Neither ‘Saints’ Nor ‘Prostitutes’: Sexual Discourse in the Filipina Domestic Worker Community in Hong Kong. Women’s Studies International Forum23(1): 73–87.
6.
ChoiSTingKF (2009) A Gender Perspective on Families in Hong Kong. In: CheungFHolroydE (eds) Mainstreaming Gender in Hong Kong Society. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
7.
ConstableN (2007) Maid to Order in Hong Kong: Stories of Migrant Workers. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
8.
CortesPPanJ (2009) Outsourcing Household Production: The Demand for Foreign Domestic Helpers and Native Labor Supply in Hong Kong. Working paper. Chicago: University of Chicago, Booth School of Business.
9.
EhrenreichBHochschildA (2002) Global Woman: Nannies, Maids and Sex Workers in the New Economy. New York: Holt.
10.
EviotaE (1992) The Political Economy of Gender: Women and the Sexual Division of Labour in the Philippines. London: Zed Books.
11.
GregsonNLoweM (1994) Waged Domestic Labour and the Renegotiation of the Domestic Division of Labour within Dual Career Households. Sociology48(1): 55–78.
12.
HochschildAR (1983) The Managed Heart: the Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
13.
HochschildAR (2003) with Machung AThe Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home. New York: Viking Penguin.
14.
Hongdagneu-SoteloP (1994) Gendered Transactions: Mexican Experience of Immigration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
15.
Hong Kong Census and Statistics Department (2001) Men and Women in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: The Government of the Hong Kong SAR.
RollinsJ (1985) Between Women: Domestics and their Employers. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
28.
RomeroM (1992) Maid in the U.S.A.London: Routledge.
29.
RosbochA (2010) Hiring and Managing Domestic Help. Hong Kong: Haven Books.
30.
SevenhuijsenS (1998) Citizenship and the Ethics of Care: Feminist Consideration on Justice, Morality and Politics. London: Routledge.
31.
SchwalbeMLGodwinSHoldenDSchrockDThompsonSWolkomirM (2000) Generic Processes in the Reproduction of Inequality: A Interactionist Analysis. Social Forces79(2): 419–452.
32.
TamV (1999) Foreign Domestic Helpers in Hong Kong and Their Role in Childcare Provision. In: Henshall MomsenJ (ed.) Gender Migration and Domestic Service. London and New York: Routledge, 263–276.
33.
ZadoroznyjM (2009) Professionals, Carers or Strangers? Liminality and the Typification of Postnatal Home Care Workers. Sociology43(2): 268–285.
34.
ZuoJBianY (2001) Gendered Resources, Division of Housework, and Perceived Fairness – A Case in Urban China. Journal of Marriage and the Family: 1122–1133.
