The concept of ambivalence has received limited attention from contemporary sociologists, notably because of its association with psychoanalysis and psychology and their emphasis on individual experience in isolation from the broader social and cultural contexts to which people belong. This article revisits the concept by placing it within a framework of relational sociology with the purpose of strengthening its conceptual foundations as a sociological construct. We illustrate the foundations of this framework through analysis of narratives collected as part of the project ‘Old age and autonomy: The role of service systems and intergenerational family solidarity’, involving interviews with adult children and their ageing parents engaged in informal caring relationships. Viewed through a relational lens, ambivalence can be reconceptualized as having both temporal and transformative properties and as the product of complex relational experiences existing within a wider web of interdependent social relationships.
Bauman Z. ( 1991) Modernity and Ambivalence. Cambridge : Polity.
2.
Beck U. ( 1994) The reinvention of politics: Towards a theory of reflexive modernity. In: Beck U, Giddens A and Lash S (eds) Reflexive Modernization. Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity.
3.
Connidis IA ( 2002) Qualitative approaches to studying ambivalence and intergenerational relations. Presentation to the OASIS workshop (unpublished), Keele University.
4.
Connidis IA and McMullin JA ( 2002a) Sociological ambivalence and family ties: A critical perspective. Journal of Marriage and the Family64(3): 558-68.
5.
Connidis IA and McMullin JA ( 2002b) Ambivalence, family ties, and doing sociology . Journal of Marriage and Family64(3): 594-601.
6.
Coser RL ( 1966) Role distance, sociological ambivalence and transitional status systems. American Journal of Sociology72: 173-87.
7.
Dépelteau F. ( 2008) Relational thinking: A critique of co-deterministic theories of structure and agency. Sociological Theory26(1): 51-73.
8.
Donati P. ( 1998) Sociological ambivalence in the thought of R.K. Merton . In: Mongardini C and Tabboni S (eds) Robert K. Merton and Contemporary Sociology. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction , 101-20.
9.
Elias N. ( 1978) What is Sociology?London: Hutchinson.
10.
Emirbayer M. ( 1997) Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology103(2): 281-317.
11.
Ferring D., Michels T., Boll T. and Filipp S-H. ( 2009) Emotional relationship quality of adult children with ageing parents: On solidarity, conflict and ambivalence. European Journal of Ageing6: 253-65.
12.
Finch J. ( 1989) Family Obligations and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.
13.
Finch J. and Mason J. ( 1993) Negotiating Family Responsibilities. London: Tavistock/Routledge.
14.
Finch J and Mason J (eds) (2000) Passing on: Kinship and Inheritance in England. London: Routledge.
15.
Fingerman KL and Hay E. ( 2004) Intergenerational ambivalence in the context of the larger social network. In: Pillemer K and Lüscher K (eds) Intergenerational Ambivalences: New Perspectives on Parent-Child Relations in Later Life: Vol. 4Contemporary Perspectives in Family Research . New York: Elsevier Jai, 133-51.
16.
Fingerman KL, Hay EL and Birditt KS ( 2004) The best of ties, the worst of ties: Close, problematic, and ambivalent social relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family66(3): 792-809.
17.
Giddens A. ( 1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge : Polity.
18.
Giddens A. ( 1991) Modernity and Self-identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity.
19.
Hillcoat-Nallétamby S.(2010) Exploring intergenerational relations in a multicultural context: The example of filial responsibility in Mauritius. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology25(1): 71-86.
20.
Hopkins D, Kleres J, Flam H and Kuzmics H (eds) (2009) Theorizing Emotions. Sociological Explorations and Applications. Frankfurt : Campus Verlag.
21.
Katz R.(2009) Intergenerational family relations and subjective well-being in old age: A cross-national study. European Journal of Ageing6: 79-90.
22.
Le Bihan B. and Martin C. ( 2008) Caring for dependent elderly parents and family configurations . In: Oris M (ed.) Beyond the Nuclear Family: Families in a Configurational Perspective . Bern: Peter Lang, 59-78.
23.
Lorenz-Meyer D. ( 2001) The Politics of Ambivalence: Towards a Conceptualisation of Structural Ambivalence in Intergenerational Relations. Gender Institute New Working Paper Series, Issue 2. London: London School of Economics . Available at: http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/genderInstitute/pdf/thePoliticsOfAmbivalence.pdf
24.
Lorenz-Meyer D. ( 2004) The ambivalences of parental care among young adults in Germany. In: Lüscher K and Pillemer K (eds) Intergenerational Ambivalences: A New Perspective on Parent-Child Relations in Later Life: Vol. 4Contemporary Perspectives in Family Research . Oxford: Elsevier Science, 225-52.
25.
Lowenstein A. ( 2007) Solidarity-conflict and ambivalence: Testing two conceptual frameworks and their impact on quality of life for older family members. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences62B(2): S100-S108.
26.
Lowenstein A and Ogg J (eds) (2003) Old Age and Autonomy: The Role of Service Systems and Intergenerational Family Solidarity. Final Report. Haifa: Centre for Research and Study of Aging, University of Haifa, Israel.
27.
Lüscher K. ( 2002) Intergenerational ambivalence: Further steps in theory and research. Journal of Marriage and Family64(3): 585-94.
28.
Lüscher K. and Pillemer K. ( 1998) Intergenerational ambivalence: A new approach to the study of parent-child relations in later life. Journal of Marriage and the Family60: 413-25.
29.
Merton RK ( 1976) Sociological Ambivalence and Other Essays. New York: Free Press.
30.
Merton RK and Barber E. ( 1963) Sociological ambivalence. In: Tiryakian EA (ed.) Sociological Theory, Values and Sociocultural Change: Essays in Honor of Pitirim A. Sorokin. London: Free Press of Glencoe, 91-120.
31.
Nedelmann B. ( 1998) Robert K. Merton’s concept of sociological ambivalence: The Florentine case of the ‘man-ape’. In: Mongardini C and Tabboni S (eds) Robert K. Merton and Contemporary Sociology . New Brunswick : Transaction, 121-38.
32.
Peters CL, Hooker K. and Zvonkovic A. ( 2006) Older parents’ perceptions of ambivalence in relationships with their children. Family Relations - Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies55(5): 539-52.
33.
Phillips J., Ajrouch K. and Hillcoat-Nallétamby S. ( 2010) Key Concepts in Social Gerontology. London: Sage.
34.
Pillemer K and Lüscher K (eds) (2004) Intergenerational Ambivalences: New Perspectives on Parent-Child Relations in Later Life. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
35.
Pillemer K. and Suitor JJ ( 2002) Explaining mothers’ ambivalence toward their adult children. Journal of Marriage and Family64(3): 602-13.
36.
Pillemer K., Suitor JJ, Mock SE, Sabir M., Pardo TB and Sechrist J. ( 2007) Capturing the complexity of intergenerational relations: Exploring ambivalence within later-life families. Journal of Social Issues63(4): 775-91.
37.
Radina ME and Downs KJM ( 2005) Asking new questions of existing qualitative data . In: Bengtson VL, Acock AC, Allen KR, Dilworth-Anderson P and Klein DM (eds) Sourcebook of Family Theory and Research. London: Sage, 63-4.
38.
Rappoport A. and Lowenstein A. ( 2007) A possible innovative association between the concept of inter-generational ambivalence and the emotion of guilt and shame in care-giving . European Journal of Ageing4(1): 13-21.
39.
Schinkel W. ( 2007) Sociological discourse of the relational: The cases of Bourdieu and Latour. The Sociological Review55(4): 707-29.
40.
Schinkel W. and Tacq J. ( 2004) The Saussurean influence in Pierre Bourdieu’s relational sociology. International Sociology19(51): 51-70.
41.
Smart B. ( 1999) Facing Modernity: Ambivalence, Reflexivity and Morality . London: Sage.
42.
Smart C. ( 2009) Relationality and socio-cultural theories of family life . Paper presented at the Rethinking Concepts: Families, Intimacies and Personal Relationships Colloquium, London , 6 November.
43.
Smelser NJ ( 1998) The rational and the ambivalent in the social sciences . American Sociological Review63: 1-16.
44.
Turner JH and Stets JE (eds) (2009) The Sociology of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
45.
Van Gaalen RI, Dykstra PA and Komter AE (2009) Where is the exit? Intergenerational ambivalence and relationship quality in high contact ties. Journal of Aging Studies24(2): 105-14.
46.
Ward RA ( 2008) Multiple parent-adult child relations and well-being in middle and later life. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences63: S239-S247.
47.
Weigert AJ ( 1991) Mixed Emotions: Certain Steps toward Understanding Ambivalence . Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
48.
Wethington E., Kamp Dush CM and Hertzog SM ( 2008) Parental ambivalence across the life course: A 10-year longitudinal study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Sheraton Boston and the Boston Marriott Copley Place, Boston, MA , 31 July.
49.
Widmer E and Jallinoja R (eds) (2008) Beyond the Nuclear Family: Families in a Configurational Perspective. Bern: Peter Lang.
50.
Wilson A., Shuey K. and Elder GH ( 2003) Ambivalence in the relationship of adult children to ageing parents and in-laws. Journal of Marriage and Family65: 1055-72.
51.
Willson AE, Shuey KM, Elder GH and Wickrama KAS ( 2006) Ambivalence in mother-adult child relations: A dyadic analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly69(3): 235-52.
