The article presents an exploratory analysis of the significance of personal names in contemporary Western societies, the UK in particular. Names are seen as having the dual character of denoting the individuality of the person, and also marking social connections.The focus is particularly on kinship, and the ways in which names can be, and are, used to map family connections as well as to identify unique individuals.The author argues that both surnames and forenames can serve to ground the individual within family relationships, though the extent to which this is used actively can vary. In turn the way in which names and naming are used within the family context sheds light upon contemporary kinship, with its enduring and variable dimensions. Additional empirical exploration of names and naming could further illuminate its characteristics.
Alford, R. (1988) Naming and Identity: A Cross-Cultural Study of Personal Naming Practices. New Haven, CT: HRAF Press.
2.
Almack, K. (2005) `What's in a Name? The Significance of the Choice of Surnames Given to Children Born within Lesbian-Parent Families', Sexualities8(2): 239-54.
3.
Benson, S. (2006) `Injurious Naming: Naming, Disavowal and Recuperation in the Contexts of Slavery and Emancipation', in G. vom Bruck and B. Bodenhorn (eds) An Anthropology of Names and Naming, pp. 178-94. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
4.
Bernard, J. (1973) The Future of Marriage. London : Souvenir Press.
5.
Besnard, P. (1995) `A Study of Social Taste through First Names: Comment on Lieberson and Bell', American Journal of Sociology100(5): 1313-17.
6.
Bodenhorn, B. and G. Vom Bruck (2006) `"Entangled Histories": An Introduction to the Anthropology of Names and Naming', in G. vom Bruck and B. Bodenhorn (eds) An Anthropology of Names and Naming, pp. 1-30. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
7.
Bond, A. (1998) `Reconstructing Families: Changing Children's Surnames' , Child and Family Law Quarterly10(1): 17-27.
8.
Carsten, J. (2004) After Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Deed Poll Service (n.d.) URL (consulted 8 June 2008): http://www.ukdps.co.uk
10.
Edwards, J., S. Franklin, E. Hirsch, F. Price and M. Strathern (1993) Technologies of Procreation: Kinship in the Age of Assisted Conception. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
11.
Elias, N. (1991) The Society of Individuals. Oxford: Blackwell.
12.
Finch, J. (2004) `Family Policy and Civil Registration: An Analysis of the White Paper "Civil Registration: Vital Change"', Journal of Social Policy33(2): 249-66.
13.
Finch, J. (2007) `Displaying Families', Sociology41(1): 65-81.
14.
Finch, J. and J. Mason (1993) Negotiating Family Responsibilities. London: Routledge.
15.
Finch, J. and J. Mason (2000) Passing on: Kinship and Inheritance in England . London: Routledge.
16.
Franklin, S. and S. McKinnon (2001) `Introduction', in S. Franklin and S. McKinnon (eds) Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, pp. 1-25. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
17.
Friedan, B. (1963) The Feminine Mystique. London : Gollancz.
18.
Friedan, B. (1983) The Second Stage. London: Abacus.
19.
General Register Office (n.d.) URL (consulted 8 June 2008): http://www.gro.gov.uk
20.
Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge: Polity.
21.
Hanks, P. and F. Hodges (2003) Oxford Dictionary of First Names. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
Harvey, D. (1996) Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference . Oxford: Blackwell.
23.
Hey, D. (2000) Family Names and Family History. London: Hambledon and London.
24.
Jenkins, R. (1996) Social Identity. London: Routledge.
25.
Jessell, S. (2006) `France's Morning After', Catalyst , URL (consulted April 2008): http://www.cre.gov.uk/Default.aspx.LocID (accessed 7 April 2007).
26.
Johnson, D.R. and L.K. Scheuble (2002) `What Should We Call our Kids?', The Social Science Journal39(3): 419-29.
27.
Lieberson, S. (1995) `Reply to Phillipe Besnard', American Journal of Sociology100(5): 1317-25.
28.
Lieberson, S. and E.O. Bell (1992) `Children's First Names: An Empirical Study in Social Taste', American Journal of Sociology98(3): 511-54.
29.
Lord, E. (2002) `Given Names and Inheritance', in D. Postles (ed.) Naming, Society and Regional Identity: 169-92. Oxford: Leopard's Head Press.
30.
Main, G.L. (1996) `Naming Children in Early New England', Journal of Interdisciplinary History27(1): 1-27.
31.
Morgan, D.H.J. (1996) Family Connections. Cambridge : Polity Press.
32.
Office for National Statistics, 2000Social Trends, 30. London. The Stationery office.
33.
Postles, D. (ed.) (2002) Naming, Society and Regional Identity. Oxford: Leopard's Head Press.
34.
Ribbens-McCarthy, J., R. Edwards and V. Gillies (2003) Making Families: Moral Tales of Parenting and Step-Parenting . Durham: Sociology Press.
35.
Rossi, A.S. (1965) `Naming Children in Middle Class Families', American Sociological Review30: 499-513.
36.
Scharf, T. (2005) `Recruiting Older Participants: Lessons from Deprived Neighbourhoods', in C. Holland (ed.) Recruitment and Sampling: Qualitative Research with Older People , pp. 229-43. London: Centre for Policy on Ageing.
37.
Schurer, K. (2004) `Surnames and the Search for Regions', Local Population Studies72: 50-76.
38.
Scott, J.C., J. Tehranian and J. Matthias (2002) `The Production of Legal Identities Proper to States: The Case of the Permanent Family Surname', Comparative Studies in Society and History44(1): 4-44.
39.
Scott Smith, D. (1984) `Child Naming Practices as Cultural and Family Indicators', Local Population Studies32: 17-27.
40.
Scott Smith, D. (1985) `Child Naming Practices, Kinship Ties and Change in Family Attitudes in Hingham, Massachusetts, 1641-1800', Journal of Social History18(4): 541-66.
41.
Shackleton, J. (1990) `The Given Name', Local Government Review154: 310-11.
42.
Silva, E.B. (2005) `Gender, Home and Family in Cultural Capital Theory' , British Journal of Sociology56(1): 83-103.
43.
Smart, C. and B. Neale (1999) Family Fragments?Cambridge : Polity Press.
44.
Strathern, M. (1992) After Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Tebbenhoff, E. (1985) `Tacit Rules and Hidden Family Structures: Naming Practices and Godparentage in Schenactady, New York, 1680-1800', Journal of Social History18(4): 567-85.
46.
Times Law Report (1999a) Dawson v Wearmouth. House of Lords, 26 March.
47.
Times Law Report (1999b) Relevant Factors in Changing a Child's Name. Court of Appeal, 5 August.
48.
Weeks, J., B. Heaphy and C. Donovan (2001) Same Sex Intimacies. London : Routledge.
49.
Weston, K. (1991) Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays and Kinship . New York: Columbia University Press.
50.
Williams, F. (2004) Rethinking Families. London : Calouste Gulbenkin Foundation.
51.
Wolfram, S. (1987) In-laws and Out-laws: Kinship and Marriage in England . London: Croom Helm.
52.
Zittoun, T. (2004) `Symbolic Competencies for Developmental Transitions: The Case of the Choice of First Names', Culture and Psychology10(2): 131-61.
