This article describes rhetorical and sequential resources used by audiences as they participate in political discourse.The data are recordings of Area Assemblies held in North London between 2001 and 2003.The research contributes to studies of political discourse, by describing the fine interactional organization of the seemingly ‘unruly’ scenes that arise when councillors and officers confront large numbers of angry residents.
Atkinson, M.J. (1984) ‘Public Speaking and Audience Responses: Some Techniques for Inviting Applause’, in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action, pp. 370–410. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
2.
Benhabib, S. (1992) ‘Models of Public Space: Hannah Arendt, the Liberal Tradition, and Jurgen Habermas’, in C. Calhoun (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere, pp. 73–98. London: MIT Press .
3.
Blumer, H. (1939) ‘Collective Behaviour’, in R.E. Park (ed.) Principles of Sociology, pp. 218–288. New York: Barnes and Noble .
4.
Clayman, S,E. (1993) ‘Booing: The Anatomy of a Disaffiliative Response’ , American Sociological Review58(Feb.): 110–130 .
5.
Corrigan, P. and P. Joyce (1997) ‘Reconstructing Public Management: A New Responsibility for the Public and a Case Study of Local Government’ , International Journal of Public Sector Management10(6): 417–432 .
6.
DETR (1998) Modern Local Government: In Touch with the People. CM 4014. London: DETR TSO .
7.
Drew, P. and J. Heritage (1992) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
8.
Garcia, A. (1991) ‘Dispute Resolution without Disputing: How the Interactional Organisation of Mediation Hearings Minimises Argument’ , American Sociological Review56(Dec.): 818–835 .
9.
Habermas, J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press .
10.
Heritage, J. and D. Greatbatch (1986) ‘Generating Applause: A Study of Rhetoric and Response at Party Political Conferences’ , American Journal of Sociology92(1): 110–157 .
11.
Hutchby, I. (1992) ‘Confrontation Talk: Aspects of ‘Interruption’ in Argument Sequences on Talk Radio’ , Text12(3): 343–371 .
12.
Hutchby, I. (1999) ‘Rhetorical Strategies in Audience Participation Debates on Radio and TV’ , Research on Language and Social Interaction32(3): 243–267 .
13.
Lowndes, V. , L. Pratchett and G. Stoker (2001) ‘Trends in Public Participation: Part 1 – Local Government Perspectives’ , Public Administration79(1): 205–222 .
14.
McIlvenny, P. (1996) ‘Heckling in Hyde Park: Verbal Audience Participation in Popular Public Discourse’ , Language in Society25: 27–60 .
15.
Martin, S. (1997) ‘Leadership, Learning and Local Democracy’ , International Journal of Public Sector Management10(7): 534–546 .
16.
Maynard, D. (1985) ‘How Children Start Arguments’ , Language in Society14: 1–30 .
17.
Pugh, D. (1973) ‘The Measurement of Organisational Structures: Does Context Determine Form?’ , Organizational Dynamics(Spring): 19–34 .
18.
Sacks, H. (1992) Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell .
19.
Sacks, H. , E. Schegloff and G. Jefferson (1974) ‘A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation’ , Language50(4): 696–735 .
20.
Schiffrin, D. (1985) ‘Everyday Argument: The Organization of Diversity in Talk’, in T.A. van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis, vol. 3, pp. 35–46. London: Academic Press .
21.
Simmel, G. (1955[1908]) The Web of Group Affiliations. London: The Free Press of Glencoe .
22.
Smith, M. and M. Beazley (2000) ‘Progressive Regimes, Partnerships and the Involvement of Local Communities: A Framework for Evaluation’ , Public Administration78(4): 855–878 .
