Social science has long fought shy of the natural sciences. Meanwhile, concerns with the environment, health and the new genetics are creating a need for systematic links to be made between these disciplines. This paper suggests a new way in which social theory can be linked to biology. Recent developments in biology point to the importance of considering organisms in relation to their environment. And work in epidemiology stresses the links between the infant-development, health in later life and the well-being of future generations. Complex combinations of genetically-determined predispositions and capitalist social relations are responsible for important features of contemporary social stratification and well-being. The paper is informed by critical realist epistemology and Marx's theory of the subsumption. Such a fusion leads to a key assertion. Capital tends to modify the powers of human biology in its own image.
Barker, D. 1998. Mothers, Babies and Health in Later Life. London: Churchill Livingstone.
2.
Bateson, P. and Martin, P. 1999. Design for Life. London: Cape.
3.
Benton, T.1991. `Biology and Social Science: Why the Return of the Repressed Should be Given a (Cautious) Welcome. Sociology25:1-30.
4.
Benton, T.1999. `Evolutionary Psychology and Social Science'. Advances in Human Ecology8:65-98.
5.
Bhaskar, R. 1979. The Possibility of Naturalism. Brighton: Harvester.
6.
Birke, L. 1999. `Bodies and Biology', in J. Price and M. Shildrick (eds.) 1999, op. cit.
7.
Bouchard, T., Lykken, D., McGue, M., Segal, N. and Tellegen, A.1990. `Sources of Psychological Differences: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart'. Science250:346-353.
8.
Braverman, H. 1974. Labor and Monopoly Capital. New York: Monthly Press.
9.
Buck-Morss, S. 1982. `Socio-Economic Bias In Piaget's Theory and Its Implications for Cross-Cultural Studies', in S. Modgil and C. Modgil (eds.), Jean Piaget: Consensus and Controversy. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
10.
Chorney, M., Chorney, K., Seese, N., Oliver, M., Daniels, J., McGuffin, P., Thompson, L., Detterman, D., Benbow, C., Lubinski, D., Eley, T. and Plomin, R.1998. `A Quantitative Trail Locus Associated with Cognition Ability in Children'. Psychological Science9:159-166.
Cox, M. 1980. Are Young Children Egocentric?London: Batsford.
13.
Curry, D., Cronin, H. and Ashworth, J. (eds.) 1996. `Matters of Life and Death'. Demos Quarterly 10.
14.
Daniels, M., Devlin, B. and Roeder, K. 1997. `Of Genes and IQ', in B. Devlin, S. Fienberg, D. Resnick and K. Roeder (eds.), Intelligence, Genes and Success. New York: Springer-Verlag.
15.
Das Gupta, S. 1990. `Extent and Pattern of Drug Abuse and Dependence', in H. Ghose and D. Maxwell (eds.), Substance Abuse and Dependence. London, Macmillan.
16.
Dawkins, R. 1989 (2nd edn). The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
Dejevsky, M. 1999. `Psst! You Want a Smart Kid?'Independent, 5 August.
18.
Devlin, B., Daniels, M. and Roeder, K.1997. `The Heritability of IQ'. Nature388:468-471.
19.
Dickens, P. 2000. Social Darwinism. Buckingham: Open University Press.
20.
Drouin, J-M. and Bensaude-Vincent, B. 1996. `Nature for the People', in N. Jardine, J. Secord, and E. Spary (eds.), Cultures of Natural History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Dusek, V.1999. `Sociobiology Sanitized: Evolutionary Psychology and Gene Selectionism'. Science as Culture8:129-169.
22.
Erwin, D., Valentine, J. and Jablonski, D. 1997. `The Origin of Animal Body Plans'. American Scientist, March-April. http://www.amsci/articles/9/articles/Erwin-1.html
23.
Gehring, W. 1998. Master Control Genes in Development and Evolution. New Haven: Yale.
24.
Goleman, D. 1996. Emotional Intelligence. London: Bloomsbury.
25.
Gould, S. and Lewontin, R.1979. `The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm.'Proceedings of the Royal Society B205:581-598.
26.
Hales, M. 1980. Living Thinkwork. London: CSE Books.
27.
Herrnstein, R. and Murray, C. 1994. The Bell Curve. New York: Free Press.
28.
Hubbard, R. 1990. The Politics of Women's Biology. London: Rutgers.
29.
Kandall, S. 1996. Substance and Shadow. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
30.
Keating, D. and Hertzman, C. 1999. Developmental Health and the Wealth of Nations. New York: Guilford.
31.
Keating, D. and Miller, F. 1999. `Individual Pathways in Competence and Coping', in D. Keating, and C. Hertzman, 1999, op. cit.
32.
Kohlberg, L. 1969. `Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive Developmental Approach to Socialisation, in D. Goslin (ed.), Handbook of Socialisation Theory and Research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
33.
Lampard, R. 1992. `An Empirical Study of Marriage and Social Stratification'. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford.
34.
Marmot, M. and Wadsworth, M. (eds.) 1997. `Fetal and Early Childhood Environment: Long-Term Health Implications'. British Medical Bulletin53:(1).
35.
Marteau, T. and Richards, M. 1996. The Troubled Helix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Marx, K. 1976. Capital. Vol.1. Harmondsworth: Pelican.
37.
Maynard Smith, J. 1998. Shaping Life: Genes, Embryos and Evolution. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
38.
Mies, M. and Shiva, V. 1993. Ecofeminism. London: Zed Books.
39.
Montgomery, S., Bartley, M., Cook, D. and Wadsworth, M.1996. `Health and Social Precursors of Unemployment in Young Men in Great Britain'. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health50:415-422.
40.
Montgomery, S., Bartley, M. and Wilkinson, R.1997. `Family Conflict and Slow Growth'. Archives of the Diseases of Childhood77:326-330.
41.
Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T., Boykin, A., Brody, N., Ceci, S., Halpern, D., Loehlin, J., Perloff, R., Sternberg, R. and Urbina, S.1996. `Intelligence Knowns and Unknowns'. American Psychologist51:77-101.
42.
Olds, D., Henderson, C. and Tatelbaum, R.1994. `Intellectual Impairment in Children of Women Who Smoke Cigarettes in Pregnancy'. Pediatrics93:221-227.
43.
Outram, D. 1996. `New Spaces in Natural History', in N. Jardine, J. Secord and E. Spary (eds.) op. cit.
44.
Oyama, S. 1985. The Ontogeny of Information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Pagliaro, A. and Pagliaro, L. 1996. Substance Use among Children and Adolescents. New York: Wiley.
46.
Pinker, S. 1997. How the Mind Works. Harmondsworth: Allen Lane/Penguin Press.
47.
Plomin, R., McClearn, G., Smith, D., Vignetti, S., Chorney, M., Chorney, K., Benditti, C., Kasarda, S., Thompson, L., Detterman, D., Daniels, J., Owen, M. and McGriffin, P.1994. `DNA Markers Associated with High Versus Low IQs: The Quantitative Tract Loci (QTL) Project. Behaviour Genetics24(2):107-118.
48.
Plomin, R. 1999. `Genetics and General Cognitive Ability'. Nature (forthcoming).
49.
Power, C. and Heertzman, C. 1999. `Health, Well-Being and Coping Skills', in D. Keating, and C. Hertzman, 1999, op. cit.
50.
Prandy, K. and Bottero, W.1998. `The Use of Marriage Data to Measure the Social Order in Nineteenth-Century Britain'. Sociological Research Online3,1.
51.
Price, J. and Shildrick, M. (eds.) 1999. Feminist Theory and the Body. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
52.
Reinisch, J., Saunders, S., Mortensen, E. and Robin, D.1995. `In Utero Exposure to Phenobarbitol and Intelligence Deficits in Adult Men.'Journal of the American Medical Association274:1518-1525.
53.
Robertis, E., Oliver, G. and Wright, C.1990. `Homeobox Genes and the Vertebrate Body Plan'. Scientific American, 263(1):26-32.
54.
Rowland, R. 1992. Living Laboratories. London: Lime Tree.
55.
Rush, D., Stein, Z., Sussex, M. and Brody, N. 1980. Chapter in D. Rush, M. Stein and M. Sussex (eds.), Diet in Pregnancy. New York: Liss.
56.
Sayer, A. 2000. Realism and the Social Sciences. London: Sage.
57.
Secord, A. 1996. `Artisan Botany', in N. Jardine, J. Secord and E. Spary (eds.), op. cit.
58.
Shilling, C.1997. `The Undersocialised Conception of the Fmbodied Agent in Modern Sociology.'Sociology31:737-754.
