Narcofeminism began in 2019 as a rallying principle for women who use drugs to establish links between feminist organising and drug user activism. This article elaborates narcofeminism as a site of feminist resistance to patriarchal orders and modes of rationality. It presents an auto-ethnographic account and examples of drug user activism to explore drug use as a form of resistance to dominant social orders. Woven through this auto-ethnographic account is a discussion of the political imperatives of my experiences as an ‘Othered’ subject. Building on my 2020 piece featured in a flagship book on women, gender and drug policy, it pushes for a recognition of the diverse perspectives of women who use drugs and seeks to bestow more authority to voices with lived experience. It concludes with a discussion of how we might forge empathetic connections between the Feminist Self and Feminist ‘Others’ in our common embodied experiences of marginality, even if separated by context, time and space.
BenhabibS. (1990). Hannah Arendt and the redemptive power of narrative. Social Research, 57(1), 167–196.
5.
BordoS. (1993). Unbearable weight: Feminism, Western culture, and the body. University of California Press.
6.
BourgoisP. (2000). Disciplining addictions: The bio-politics of methadone and heroin in the United States. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 24(2), 165–195. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005574918294
7.
BreezeM.TaylorY. (2018). Feminist collaborations in higher education: Stretched across career stages. Gender and Education, 32(3), 412–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2018.1471197
8.
BuxtonJ.MargoG.BurgerL. (Eds.). (2020). The impact of global drug policy on women: Shifting the Needle (1st ed.). Emerald Publishing.
9.
CampbellN. (2000). Using women: Gender, drug policy, and social justice. Routledge.
ChangJ. (2020). Women who use drugs: Resistance and rebellion. In BuxtonJ.MargoG.BurgerL. (Eds.), The impact of global drug policy on women: Shifting the needle (pp. 271–286). Emerald Publishing.
CohenS. (1985). Visions of social control: Crime, punishment and classification. Cambridge University Press.
14.
De RuddereL.GoubertL.StevensM.WilliamsA.CrombezG. (2012). Discounting pain in the absence of medical evidence is explained by negative evaluation of the patient. Pain, 154(5), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2012.12.018
Du RoseN. (2015). The governance of female drug users: Women’s experiences of drug policy (1st ed.). Bristol University Press.
19.
DuffC. (2004). Drug use as a ‘practice of the self’: Is there any place for an ‘ethics of moderation’ in contemporary drug policy?International Journal of Drug Policy, 15(5), 385–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2004.06.010
DuffC. (2009). Towards a theory of drug use contexts: Space, embodiment and practice. Addiction Research and Theory, 15, 503–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066350601165448
22.
DuncanT.DuffC.SebarB.LeeJ. (2017). ‘Enjoying the kick’: Locating pleasure within the drug consumption room. International Journal of Drug Policy, 49, 92–101.
23.
EllisC. (2013). Carrying the torch for autoethnography. In JonesS. H.AdamsT. E.EllisC. (Eds.), Handbook of autoethnography (pp. 9–12). Left Coast Press.
24.
EllisC.BochnerA. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 733–768). Sage.
25.
EttorreE. (2007). Revisioning women and drug use. Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
EttorreE. (2010). Nuns, dykes, drugs and gendered bodies: An autoethnography of a lesbian feminist’s journey through ‘good time’ sociology. Sexualities, 13(3), 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460709363137
27.
EttorreE. (2015). Embodied deviance, gender, and epistemologies of ignorance: Re-visioning drugs use in a neurochemical, unjust world. Substance Use & Misuse, 50(6), 794–805. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2015.978649
28.
EttorreE. (2016). Autoethnography as feminist method: Sensitising the feminist ‘I’. Routledge.
29.
EttorreE. (2017). Feminist autoethnography, gender, and drug use: ‘Feeling about’ empathy while ‘storying the I.’Contemporary Drug Problems, 44(4), 356–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091450917736160
30.
FomiattiR.MooreD.FraserS. (2018). The improvable self: Enacting model citizenship and sociality in research on ‘new recovery’. Addiction Research & Theory, 27, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2018.1544624
31.
FoucaultM. (1963). The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. Routledge.
32.
FoucaultM. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.
FraserS. (2016). Articulating addiction in alcohol and other drug policy: A multiverse of habits. International Journal of Drug Policy, 31, 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.10.014
35.
FraserS.MooreD. (Eds.). (2011). The drug effect: Health, crime, and society. Cambridge University Press.
FraserS.valentinek. (2008). Substance and substitution: Methadone subjects in liberal societies. Palgrave Macmillan.
38.
GagnonJ. D. (2018). ‘Bastard’ daughters in the ivory tower: Illegitimacy and the higher education experiences of the daughters of single mothers in the UK. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(5), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1449743
39.
GilbertsonF. (2020). Fiona’s story. In BuxtonJ.MargoG.BurgerL. (Eds.), The impact of global drug policy on women: Shifting the needle (pp. 41–46). Emerald Publishing.
HackingI. (1995). The looping effects of human kinds. In SperberD.PremackD.PremackA. (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 351–394). Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.
42.
HarrisJ.McElrathK. (2012). Methadone as social control: Institutionalized stigma and the prospect of recovery. Qualitative Health Research, 22(6), 810–824. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732311432718
43.
HolmesS. (2016). Between feminism and anorexia: An autoethnography. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 19(2), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877914561831
KaraH. (2015). Creative research methods in the social sciences: A practical guide (1st ed.). Bristol University Press.
46.
KeaneH. (2002). What’s wrong with addiction?Melbourne University Publishing.
47.
KeaneH. (2005). Addiction and the bioethics of difference. In ShildrickM.MykitiukR. (Eds.), Ethics of the body: Postconventional challenges (pp. 91–112). MIT Press.
48.
KhouryL.TangY. L.BradleyB.CubellsJ. F.ResslerK. J. (2010). Substance use, childhood traumatic experience, and Post traumatic Stress Disorder in an urban civilian population. Depression and Anxiety, 27(12), 1077–1086. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20751
49.
LeTendreM. L.ReedM. B. (2017). The effect of adverse childhood experience on clinical diagnosis of a substance use disorder: Results of a nationally representative study. Substance Use & Misuse, 52(6), 689–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2016.1253746
50.
LevineH. G. (1978). The discovery of addiction. Changing conceptions of habitual drunkenness in America. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 39(1), 143–174. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.1978.39.143
51.
MaddenA. (2022). ‘There but not there’: Drug user representation in high level drug policy settings [Doctoral Dissertation, University of New South Wales (UNSW)]. https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/24032
52.
MaherL. (1992). Reconstructing the female criminal: Women and crack cocaine. University of Southern California Review of Law and Women’s Studies, 2(1), 131–154.
53.
ManneK. (2018). Down girl: The logic of misogyny. Oxford University Press
54.
MeashamF. (2002). ‘Doing gender’–‘doing drugs’: Conceptualizing the gendering of drugs cultures. Contemporary Drug Problems, 29, 335–373.
55.
MeyersS. A.EarnshawV. A.D’AmbrosioB.CourchesneN.WerbD.SmithL. R. (2021). The intersection of gender and drug use-related stigma: A mixed methods systematic review and synthesis of the literature. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 223, 108706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108706
56.
MugfordS. (1993). Social change and the control of psychotropic drugs: Risk management, harm reduction and ‘postmodernity’. Drug and Alcohol Review, 12(4), 369–375.
57.
NettletonS.NealeJ.PickeringL. (2013). ‘I just want to be normal’: An analysis of discourses of normality among recovering heroin users. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 17(2), 174–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459312451182
58.
O’MalleyP.ValverdeM. (2004). Pleasure, freedom and drugs: The uses of ‘pleasure’ in liberal governance of drug and alcohol consumption. Sociology, 38(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038504039359
59.
PerroneD. (2010). Gender and sexuality in the field: A female ethnographer’s experience researching drug use in dance clubs. Substance Use & Misuse, 45, 717–735. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826081003595127
PitardJ. (2016). Using vignettes within autoethnography to explore layers of cross-cultural awareness as a teacher. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.1.2393
62.
RaceK. (2008). The use of pleasure in harm reduction: Perspectives from the history of sexuality. International Journal on Drug Policy, 19(5), 417–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.08.008
63.
RappR. (2001). Gender, body, biomedicine: How some feminist concerns dragged reproduction to the center of social theory. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 15(4), 466–477.
64.
Reed-DanahayD. (2002). Turning points and textual strategies in ethnographic writing. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 15(4), 421–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390210145480
65.
Santos da SilveiraP.Andrade de TostesJ. G.WanH. T.RonzaniT. M.CorriganP. W. (2018). The stigmatization of drug use as mechanism of legitimation of exclusion. In RonzaniT. M. (Ed.), Drugs and social context (pp. 15–25). Springer International Publishing.
66.
SaukkoP. (2008). The anorexic self: A personal, political analysis of a diagnostic discourse. SUNY Press.
ShildrickM. (1997). Leaky bodies and boundaries: Feminism, postmodernism and (bio)ethics (1st ed.). Routledge.
69.
Shirley-BeavanS.RoigA.Burke-ShyneN.DanielsC.CsakR. (2020). Women and barriers to harm reduction services: A literature review and initial findings from a qualitative study in Barcelona, Spain. Harm Reduction Journal, 17(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-020-00429-5
SimonC.VincentL.CoulterA.SalazarZ.VoylesN.RobertsL.FrankD.BrothersS. (2022). The methadone manifesto: Treatment experiences and policy recommendations from methadone patient activists. American Journal of Public Health, 112(S2), S117–S122. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306665
72.
SofuogluM.DeVitoE. E.CarrollK. M. (2018). Pharmacological and behavioral treatment of opioid use disorder. Psychiatric Research and Clinical Practice, 1(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.prcp.20180006
73.
SparkesA. (2003). Bodies, identities, selves: Autoethnographic fragments and reflections. In DenisonJ.MarkulaP. (Eds.), ‘Moving writing’: Crafting movement and sport research (pp. 51–76). Peter Lang.
TurbineV. (2019). First generation feminist? Auto-ethnographic reflections on politicisation and finding a home within feminism. Genealogy, 3(2), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy3020033
ValenciaJ.Alvaro-MecaA.TroyaJ.GutiérrezJ.RamónC.RodríguezA.Vázquez-MorónS.ResinoS.MorenoS.RyanP. (2020). Gender-based vulnerability in women who inject drugs in a harm reduction setting. PLOS ONE, 15, e0230886. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230886
79.
WalkerI. (2020). Women and the politics of pleasure in critical drug studies. In BuxtonJ.MargoG.BurgerL. (Eds.), The impact of global drug policy on women: Shifting the needle (pp. 33–40). Emerald Publishing.
