Embracing the manifesto for a ‘live’ sociology, I included portraiture into the research design of an ethnographic study into women’s lived experiences of French suburbia and organised an exhibition entitled Habitantes d’Hier and d’Aujourd’hui: exposition sociologique et photographique. This was a personal project in the neighbourhood of my youth and was motivated by the intention to shine some light on the invisible stories of women living in lower-middle and middle-income suburbs in France. In this article, I reflect on the use of portraiture for the possibility it offers in capturing the ethnographic encounter as well as in giving saliency and offering a visual representation of the sociological analysis. I also discuss the exhibition of these portraits as a moment of conviviality grounded in the endeavour of writing differently from hegemonic modes of academic communication and dissemination allowing for a sharing and sharpening of the sociological imagination. It represents an opportunity to think beyond some of the more neoliberal imperatives that govern academia today and shape our sociological craft. I argue for the value of creating a moment of conviviality, that is a space challenging modes of dissemination, engagement and even impact to some extent, as well as modes of knowledge production: broadly opening up more possibilities for a truly public sociology to continue to exist.
AtkinsonP.CoffeyA. (1995). Realism and its discontents: On the crisis of cultural representation in ethnographic texts. In AdenB.AllanS. (Eds.), Theorizing culture: An interdisciplinary critique after postmodernism (pp. 41–57). New York University Press.
3.
AubertD. (2009). The doorstep portrait: Intrusion and performance in mainstream American documentary photography. Visual Studies, 24(1), 1–18.
4.
BackL. (2007). The art of listening. Berg.
5.
BackL. (2012). Live sociology: Social research and its futures. In BackL.PuwarN. (Eds.), Live methods (pp. 18–39). Wiley-Blackwell/The Sociological Review.
BackL.PuwarN. (2012). A manifesto for live methods: Provocations and capacities. In BackL.PuwarN. (Eds.), Live methods (pp. 6–17). Wiley-Blackwell/The Sociological Review.
8.
BurawoyM. (2005). For public sociology. American Sociological Review, 70(4), 4–28.
9.
BurawoyM.Van HoldtK. (2012). Conversations with Bourdieu: The Johannesburg moment. WITS University Press.
10.
BurtonS. (2016). Becoming sociological: Disciplinarity and sense of home. Sociology, 50(5), 984–992
11.
BurtonS. (2018). Writing yourself in? The price of playing the (feminist) game in the neoliberal university. In TaylorY.LahadK. (Eds.), Feeling academic in the neoliberal university: Feminist flights, fights and failures (pp. 115–136). Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
CartierM.CoutantI.MascletO.SiblotY. (2008). La France des « petits-moyens ». Editions La Découverte.
13.
CliffordJ.MarcusG. F. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. University of California Press.
14.
DaviesB.GannonS. (2006). Doing collective biography: Investigating the production of subjectivity. Open University Press.
15.
DeeganM. J. (1989). Sociology and conviviality: A conversation with Ellenhorn on convivial sociology. Humanity and Society, 13(1), 85–88.
16.
DodierR. (2012). Habiter les espaces périurbains. Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
17.
DupuisA.ThornsD. C. (1998). Home, home ownership and the search of ontological security, The Sociological Review, 46(1), 24–47.
18.
EvansR. (2016). Achieving and evidencing research ‘impact’? Tensions and dilemmas from an ethic of care perspective. Area, 48(2), 213–221.
GillR.PrattA. (2008). In the social factory: Immaterial labour, precariousness and cultural work. Theory, Culture and Society, 25(7–8), 1–30.
21.
GilroyP. (2004). After empire: Melancholia or convivial culture?Routledge.
22.
GordonA. (2008). Ghostly Matters: haunting and the sociological imagination. University of Minnesota Press.
23.
GuilluyC. (2014). La France périphérique: comment on a sacrifié les classes populaires. Flammarion.
24.
HalfordS.KnowlesC. (2005). More than words: Some reflections on working visually. Sociological Research Online, 10(1).
25.
HiscockR.KearnsA.MacintyreS.EllawayA. (2001). Ontological security and psycho-social benefits from the home: Qualitative evidence on issues of tenure. Housing, Theory and Society, 18, 50–66.
26.
HymesD. (1981). In vain I tried to tell you: Essays in Native American ethnopoetics. University of Pennsylvania Press.
27.
IllichI. (1973). Tools for conviviality. Marion Boyars.
28.
JungnickelK. (Ed.). (2020). Transmissions: Critical tactics for making and communicating research. MIT Press.
29.
KarnerC.ParkerD. (2011). Conviviality and conflict: Pluralism, resilience and hope in inner-city Birmingham, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37(3), 355–372.
30.
KernL.HawkinsR.Falconer Al-HindiK.MossP. (2014). A collective biography of joy in academic practice. Social and Cultural Geography, 15(7), 834–851.
31.
KriebelS. (2007). Theories of photography: A short history. In ElkinsJ. (Ed.), Photography theory (pp. 3–73). Routledge.
32.
LambertA. (2015). « Tous propriétaires! »: l’envers du décor pavillonaire. Seuil.
33.
Larousse/VUEF. (2002). Le petit Larousse, grand format.
34.
LevineD. N. (1995). Visions of the sociological tradition. The University of Chicago Press.
35.
MarescaS. (1998). Les apparences de la vérité. Terrain, 30, 83–94.
MienczakowskiJ. (2001). Ethnodrama: performed research – limitations and potential. In AtkinsonP.CoffeyA.DelamontS.LoflandJ.LoflandL. (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 468–476). Sage.
O’NeillM.GiddensS.BreatnachP.BagleyC.BourneD.JudgeT. (2002). Renewed methodologies for social research: Ethno-mimesis as performative praxis. The Sociological Review, 50(1), 69–88.
40.
OsborneT.RoseN.SavageM. (2008). Editors’ introduction. Reinscribing British sociology: Some critical reflections. The Sociological Review, 56(4), 519–534.
41.
PereiraM. d. M. (2012). ‘Feminist theory is proper knowledge, but. . .’: The status of feminist scholarship in the academy. Feminist Theory, 13(3), 283–303.
SaundersP. (1990). A nation of homeowners. Allen and Unwin.
48.
SavageM.BurrowsR. (2007). The coming crisis of empirical sociology. Sociology, 41(5), 885–899.
49.
SavageM.BurrowsR. (2009). Some further reflections on the coming crisis of empirical sociology. Sociology, 43(4), 762–772.
50.
SinhaS.BackL. (2014). Making methods sociable: Dialogue, ethics and authorship in qualitative research. Journal of Qualitative Research, 14(4), 473–487.
51.
SmartC. (2010). Disciplined writing: On the problem of writing sociologically [NCRM Working Paper Series 02/10]. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods.
52.
SmartC. (2014). Fragments: Living with other people’s lives as analytic practice. In SmartC.HockeyJ.JamesA. (Eds.), The craft of knowledge: Experiences of living with data (pp. 1–20). Palgrave Macmillan.
53.
SparkesA. C. (2007). Embodiment, academics, and audit culture: A story seeking consideration. Qualitative Research, 7(4), 521–550.
TaylorY.LahadK. (2018). Feeling academic in the neoliberal university: Feminist flights, fights and failures. Palgrave Macmillan.
56.
TheodossopoulosD. (2016). Exoticisation undressed: Ethnographic nostalgia and authenticity in Emberá clothes [Online]. Manchester University Press.
57.
Tolia-KellyD. (2007). Participatory art: Capturing spatial vocabularies in a collective visual methodology with Melanie Cavalho and South Asian women in London. In KindonS.PainR.KesbyM. (Eds.), Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place (pp. 132-140). Routledge.
Vieillard-BaronH. (2011). Banlieues et périphérie: des singularités françaises aux réalités mondiales. Hachette Livre.
60.
WagnerP. (2009). The future of sociology: Understanding the transformations of the social [Quaderni del dipartimento di Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale; 43]. Università degli Studi di Trento.
61.
WillimR. (2017). Evoking imaginaries: Art probing, ethnography and more-than-academic practice. Sociological Research Online, 22(4), 208–231.
62.
WilsonS. (2018). Haunting and the knowing and showing of qualitative research. The Sociological Review, 66(6), 1209–1225.
63.
WiseA.VelayuthamS. (2014), Conviviality in everyday multiculturalism: Some brief comparisons between Singapore and Sydney. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 17(4), 406–430
64.
Women House. (2018). The house according to the them [exhibition catalogue]. Monnaie de Paris.
65.
WoodallJ. (1997). Introduction: Facing the subject. In WoodallJ. (Ed.), Portraiture: Facing the subject (pp. 1–25). Manchester University Press.
