The meaning of impairment is often Janus-faced. On the one hand, it is associated with defect, deformity, monstrosity and other tropes that carry the weight of ontological ruin, haunting narratives of physical, mental or sensory catastrophe that disturb the normate sense of being human. Impairment is invested with the debilitating social and moral consequences that symbolise disability. Disavowed and repudiated by the non-disabled community, disability represents the murky, shadow side of existence that separates normal embodiment from its benighted, abject ‘other’. Disgust – on the part of non-disabled, ‘clean and proper’ subjects – is the likely emotional response to the pollution and impropriety that disability represents. The emotional relation between the two parties may be mired in normate repulsion.
Association of Directors of Social Services. (2005). Safeguarding adults: A national framework of standards for good practice and outcomes in adult protection work. London, UK: Author.
2.
Berzins McCoyM. (2013). Wounded heroes: Vulnerability as a virtue in ancient Greece. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3.
BoltonS.LaaserK. (2013). Work, employment and society through the lens of moral economy. Work, Employment and Society, 27, 508–525.
4.
BoothW. (2013). On the idea of moral economy. American Political Science Review, 88, 653–667.
5.
BorsayA. (2005). Disability and social policy in Britain since 1750. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
BurghardtM. (2013). Common frailty constructed oppression: Tensions and debates on the subject of vulnerability, disability and society. Disability & Society, 28, 556–568.
8.
CorriganP. (1981). Moral regulation. The Sociological Review, 29, 313–337.
9.
DeanM. (1994). A social structure of many souls: Moral regulation, government and self-formation. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 19, 145–168.
10.
DouglasM. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
11.
DouglasM. (2000). Foreword to the Gift. In MaussM.The gift: Form and reason for exchange in archaic societies (pp. ix–xv). London, UK: Routledge.
12.
EdwardsM. (1997). Constructions of disability in the ancient Greek world. In MitchellD.SnyderS. (Eds.), The body and physical difference: Discourses of disability (pp. 35–50). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
13.
EliasN. (2000). The civilizing process. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
14.
EvansE. (1969). Physiognomics in the ancient world. Philadelphia, PA: American Philosophical Society.
15.
ForceP. (2003). Self-interest before Adam Smith: A genealogy of economic science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
FraserN. (1997). Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the post socialist condition. London, UK: Routledge.
17.
GarlandR. (2010). The eye of the beholder: Deformity and disability in the Graeco-Roman world. Bristol, UK: Bristol Classical Press.
18.
GibsonB. (2006). Disability, connectivity and transgressing the autonomous body. Journal of Medical Humanities, 27, 187–196.
19.
GoffmanE. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
20.
GoodinR. (1985). Protecting the vulnerable: A re-analysis of our social responsibilities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21.
HartsockC. (2008). Sight and blindness in Luke-Acts: The use of physical features in characterisation. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.
22.
HierS. (2002). Conceptualising moral panic through a moral economy of harm. Critical Sociology, 28, 311–334.
23.
HolmesB. (2007). The Illiad’s economy of pain. Transactions of the American Philological Society, 137, 1–24.
24.
HughesB. (2007). Being disabled: Towards a critical social ontology for disability studies. Disability & Society, 22, 673–684.
25.
HughesB. (2009). Wounded/monstrous/abject: A critique of the disabled body in the sociological imaginary. Disability & Society, 24, 399–410.
26.
HughesB. (2012a). Fear, pity and disgust: Emotions and the non-disabled imaginary. In WatsonN.RoulstoneA.ThomasC. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of disability studies (pp. 68–78). London, UK: Routledge.
27.
HughesB. (2012b). Elias: Disability, modernity and cultures of exclusion. In GoodleyD.HughesB.DavisL. (Eds.), Social theories of disability: New developments (pp. 33–60). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
28.
HughesB. (2015). Disabled people as counterfeit citizens: The politics of resentment past and present. Disability & Society, 30, 991–1004.
29.
HumeD. (2016). An enquiry concerning human understanding. London, UK: Abebooks.co.uk (Original work published 1788).
30.
HuntP. (1999). Governing morals: A social history of moral regulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
KristevaJ. (1982). Powers of horror: An essay on abjection (RoudiezL., Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
32.
LongmoreP. (1997). Conspicuous contribution and American cultural dilemmas: Telethon rituals of cleansing and renewal. In MitchellD.SnyderS. (Eds.), The body and physical difference (pp. 134–160). Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
33.
LongmoreP. (2016). Telethons, spectacle, disability and the business of charity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
34.
MillerW. (1997). The anatomy of disgust. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
NiehbuhrR. (2013). Moral man and immoral society: A study in ethics and politics. London, UK: Westminster John Knox Press (Original work published 1932).
36.
NussbaumM. (1986). The fragility of goodness: Luck and ethics in Greek tragedy and philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
OliverM. (1990). The politics of disablement. London, UK: Macmillan.
38.
PolyaniK. (2002). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston, MA: Beacon Press (Original work published 1944).
39.
QuarmbyK. (2011). Scapegoat: Why we are failing disabled people. London, UK: Portobello Books.
40.
RoulstoneA.ThomasP.BaldersonS. (2011). Between hate and vulnerability: Unpacking the British criminal justice system’s construction of disablist hate crime. Disability & Society, 26, 351–364.
41.
SartreJ.-P. (1966). Being and nothingness. London, UK: Methuen.
42.
SayerA. (2000). Moral economy and political economy. Studies in Political Economy, 61, 79–103.
43.
SayerA. (2005). The moral significance of class. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44.
SayerA. (2006). Approaching moral economy. In StehrN. (Ed.), The moralization of the markets (pp. 77–97). New York, NY: Transaction Books.
45.
SayerA. (2007). Moral economy and employment. In BoltonS. C.HoulihanM. (Eds.), Searching for the human in human resource management: Theory, practice and workplace contexts (pp. 21–40). London, UK: Palgrave.
46.
SayerA. (2011). Why things matter to people: Social science, values and ethical life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47.
SchweikS. (2009). The ugly laws. New York, NY: New York University Press.
48.
SennettR. (1996). The uses of disorder: Personal identity and city life. London, UK: Faber and Faber.
49.
SennettR. (2002). The fall of public man. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
50.
ShakespeareT. (1994). Cultural representation of disabled people: Dustbins of disavowal. Disability & Society, 12, 293–300.
51.
ShildrickM. (2002). Embodying the monster: Encounters with the vulnerable self. London, UK: Sage.
52.
ShildrickM. (2009). Dangerous discourses of disability, subjectivity and sexuality. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
53.
SmithA. (2002). The theory of moral sentiments (Ed. HaakoussenK.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press (Original work published 1759).
54.
SmithA. (2008). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. (Ed. SutherlandK.). Oxford, UK: Oxford Paperbacks (Original work published 1776).
55.
SnyderS.MitchellD. (2005). Cultural locations of disability. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
56.
SoldaticK.MeekoshaH. (2012). The place of disgust: Disability, class and gender in spaces of workfare. Societies, 2, 139–156.
57.
SoldaticK.PiniB. (2009). The three D’s of welfare: Disability, disgust and deservingness. Australian Journal of Human Rights, 15, 77–96.
58.
SznaiderN. (2001). The compassionate temperament: Care and cruelty in modern society. Boston, MA: Rowman and Littlefield.
59.
ThompsonE. P. (1966). The making of the English working class. London, UK: Vintage.
60.
ThompsonE. P. (1971). The moral economy of the English crowd in the eighteenth century. Past and Present, 50, 76–136.
61.
ThornycroftR.AsquithN. (2017). ‘Figurehead’ hate crime cases: Developing a framework for understanding and exposing the ‘problem’ with disability. Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 31, 482–494.
62.
TurnerB. (1993). Outline of a theory of human rights. Sociology, 27, 489–512.
63.
TurnerB. (2006). Vulnerability and human rights. Pittsburgh, PA: Penn State University.
64.
TylerI. (2013). Revolting subjects: Social abjection and resistance in neoliberal Britain. Cambridge, UK: Zed Books.
65.
WheatleyE. (2010). Stumbling blocks before the blind: Medieval constructions of disability. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
66.
WilsonR. (2002). The Hydra’s tale: Imagining disgust. Edmonton, Canada: The University of Alberta Press.
67.
WinzerM. (1997). Disability and society before the eighteenth century. In DavisL. (Ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 73–109). London, UK: Routledge.
68.
YoungI. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
