Austerity localism powerfully explains dynamics of (dis)empowerment at the local level, especially regarding the autonomy and accountability of local authorities and third sector organisations (TSOs) in the UK. Yet these dynamics at institutional level have also a clear impact on individuals, especially the socio-economically vulnerable. This is especially true in a time of cost-containment and welfare retrenchment. This article addresses a gap in the literature by focusing not only on TSOs but also on the experiences of vulnerable individuals under austerity localism. The discussion is centred on two types of TSOs: foodbanks and advice/advocacy organisations. Drawing upon primary qualitative data from three locations in England and Wales, the article argues that the emphatic rhetoric of empowerment within austerity localism, which others have shown to be problematic at the institutional level, does not translate into real-world empowerment for service users and other vulnerable individuals. In making the argument the article contributes to work on expanding the analytical scope of austerity localism, as well as further exploring the roles and prospects of TSOs in the current long period of austerity in the UK.
AikenM.HarrisM. (2017). The ‘hollowing out’ of smaller third sector organisations?Voluntary Sector Review, 8, 333–342.
2.
AndreC.GarciaC.GiupponiG.PareliussenJ. K. (2013). Labour market, welfare reform and inequality in the United Kingdom (OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1034). Paris, France: OECD.
3.
BaileyN. (2016). Exclusionary employment in Britain’s broken labour market. Critical Social Policy, 36, 82–103.
4.
BaileyN.PillM. (2015). Can the state empower communities through localism?Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33, 289–304.
5.
BarbourR. S.SchostakJ. (2005). Interviewing and focus groups. In SomekhB.LewinC. (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences (pp. 41–48). London, UK: Sage.
6.
CairnsB.HarrisM.YoungP. (2005). Building the capacity of the voluntary non-profit sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 28, 869–885.
7.
CameronD. (2011, February2). How we will release the grip of state control. The Telegraph.
8.
CarrH.Sefton-GreenD.TissierD. (2001). Two steps forward for tenants? In CowanD.MarshA. (Eds.), Two steps forward: Housing policy into the new millennium (pp. 157–178). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
9.
ClaytonJ.DonovanC.MerchantJ. (2015). Distancing and limited resourcefulness: Third sector service provision under austerity localism in the north east of England. Urban Studies, 53, 723–740.
10.
ClokeP.MayJ.WilliamsA. (2017). The geographies of foodbanks in the meantime. Progress in Human Geography, 41, 703–726.
11.
Conservative Party. (2009). Big Society not big government: Building a big society. London, UK.
12.
CooteA. (2010). Ten big questions about the Big Society. London, UK: New Economics Foundation.
13.
DaviesJ.PillM. (2012). Hollowing out neighbourhood governance? Rescaling revitalisation in Baltimore and Bristol. Urban Studies, 49, 2199–2217.
14.
Department for Work and Pensions. (2016). Job seekers’ allowance and employment support allowance sanctions statistics. London, UK.
15.
EagleR.JonesA.GreigA. (2017). Localism and the environment: A critical review of UK Government localism strategy 2010–2015. Local Economy, 31, 55–72.
16.
FeatherstoneD.InceA.MackinnonD.StraussK.CumbersA. (2012). Progressive localism and the construction of political alternatives. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37, 177–182.
17.
Findlay-KingL.NicholsG.ForbesD.MacfadyenG. (2016). Localism and the Big Society: Asset transfer of leisure centres and libraries. Leisure Studies, 37, 158–170.
18.
FinnD. (2003). The ‘employment-first’ welfare state: Lessons from the new deal for young people. Social Policy and Administration, 37, 709–724.
19.
GallieD.FelsteadA.GreenF.InancH. (2017). The hidden face of job insecurity. Work, Employment and Society, 31, 36–53.
HastingsA.BaileyN.BramleyG.GannonM.WatkinsD. (2015). The cost of the cuts: The impact on local governments and poorer communities. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
22.
HastingsA.BaileyN.GannonM.BesemerK.BramleyG. (2015). Coping with the cuts?Local Government Studies, 41, 601–621.
23.
HaughH.KitsonM. (2007). The Third Way and the third sector. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40, 973–944.
24.
HicksonP. (2013). The localist turn in British politics and its critics. Policy Studies, 4, 408–421.
25.
HildrethP. (2011). What is localism and what implications do different models have for managing the local economy?Local Economy, 26, 702–714.
26.
JacobsK.ManziT. (2013). New localism, old retrenchment: The ‘Big Society’, housing policy and the politics of welfare reform. Housing, Theory and Society, 30, 29–45.
27.
KendallJ. (2000). The mainstreaming of the third sector into public policy in England. Policy and Politics, 28, 541–562.
28.
KendallJ.AlmondS. (1999). United Kingdom. In SalamanL. M.et al. (Eds.), Global civil society: Dimensions of the non-profit sector (pp. 179–200). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.
29.
KersbergenK.VisB.HemerijckA. (2014). The Great Recession and welfare state reform: Is retrenchment really the only game left in town?Social Policy and Administration, 48, 883–904.
Lambie-MumfordH. (2015). Britain’s hunger crisis: Where’s the social policy? In IrvingZ.FengerM.HudsonJ. (Eds.), Social policy review 27: Analysis and debate in social policy 2015 (pp. 13–32). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
32.
Le GrandJ. (2007). The other invisible hand: Delivering public services through choice and competition. Woodstock, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
LevitasR.PantazisC.FahmyE.GordonD.LloydE.PatsiosD. (2007). The multi-dimensional analysis of social exclusion (Project Report). Bristol, UK: University of Bristol.
34.
LoopstraR.ReevesA.Taylor-RobinsonD.BarrB.McKeeM.StucklerD. (2015). Austerity, sanctions, and the rise of foodbanks in the UK. British Medical Journal, 350, H1775.
35.
LowndesV.PratchettL. (2012). Local governance under the Coalition government: Austerity, localism and the ‘Big Society’. Local Government Studies, 38, 21–40.
36.
LudwigC.LudwigG. (2014). Empty gestures? A review of the discourses of localism from the practitioner’s perspective. Local Economy, 29, 245–256.
37.
MacLeavyJ. (2011). A ‘new politics’ of austerity, workfare and gender?Regions, Economy and Society, 4, 355–367.
38.
McBrideJ.SmithA.MbalaM. (2017). ‘You end up with nothing’: The experience of being a statistic of ‘in-work poverty’ in the UK. Work, Employment and Society, 32, 210–218.
39.
MittonL. (2016). The financial crisis as game changer for the UK welfare state. In SchubertK.de VillotaP.KuhlmannJ (Eds.), Challenges to European welfare systems (pp. 743–768). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
40.
MyersJ. (2017). To austerity and beyond! Third sector innovation or creeping privatisation of public sector services?Public Money and Management, 37, 97–104.
41.
National Council for Voluntary Organisations. (2012). UK civil society almanac. London, UK.
42.
NewmanJ. (2013). Landscapes of antagonism: Local governance, neoliberalism and austerity. Urban Studies, 51, 3290–3305.
43.
OakleyM. (2014). Independent review of the operation of Jobseeker’s Allowance sanctions validated by the Jobseekers Act 2013. London, UK: Department for Work and Pensions.
44.
Office for Budget Responsibility. (2016). Welfare trends report charts and tables – October 2016. Retrieved from http://obr.uk/data/ (last accessed 3 October 2018).
OsbourneS.McLaughlinK. (2004). Structuring government: Voluntary sector relationships in the implementation of local ‘Voluntary Sector Compacts’ in England. Public Money and Management, 22, 51–63.
49.
PatrickR. (2017). For whose benefit? The everyday realities of welfare reform. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
50.
PiersonP. (1994). Dismantling the welfare state? Reagan, Thatcher and the politics of retrenchment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51.
PiersonP. (1996). The new politics of the welfare state. World Politics, 48, 143–179.
52.
PowellM. (2000). New Labour and the third way in the British welfare state: A new and distinctive approach?Critical Social Policy, 20, 39–60.
53.
PowellM.HewittM. (1998). The end of the welfare state?Social Policy and Administration, 32, 1–13.
54.
RacoM. (2013). State-led privatisation and the demise of the democratic state: Welfare reform and localism in an era of regulatory capitalism. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
55.
RichieJ.LewisJ.ElamG. (2003). Designing and selecting samples. In RichieJ.LewisJ. (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and practitioners (pp. 77–108). London, UK: Sage.
56.
ShildrickT.MacDonaldR.WebsterC.GarthwaiteK. (2012). Poverty and insecurity: Life in low-pay, no-pay Britain. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
57.
SmithD. M.WistrichE. (2014). Devolution and localism in England. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
58.
TaitM.InchA. (2016). Putting localism in place. Planning Practice and Research, 3, 174–194.
59.
Taylor-GoobyP. (2012). Beveridge overboard? How the UK government is using the crisis to permanently restructure the welfare state. Intereconomics, 4, 224–229.
60.
Trussell Trust. (2016). Primary referral causes in 2015–2016 to Trussell Trust Foodbanks. Retrieved from https://www.trusselltrust.org/what-we-do/ (last accessed 3 October 2018).
61.
VisB.van KersbergenK.HylandsT. (2011). To what extent did the financial crisis intensify the pressure to reform the welfare state?Social Policy and Administration, 45, 338–353.
62.
WattsB.FitzpatrickS.BramleyG.WatkinsD. (2014). Welfare sanctions and conditionality in the UK. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
63.
WigganJ. (2012). Telling stories of 21st century welfare: The UK Coalition government and the neo-liberal discourse of worklessness and dependency. Critical Social Policy, 32, 383–405.
64.
WilliamsA.GoodwinM.ClokeP. (2014). Neoliberalism, Big Society and progressive localism. Environment and Planning A, 46, 2798–2815.
