This paper seeks to recount the challenges and predicaments of doing fieldwork in the discipline of sociology with the central focus on ethnographic techniques of data collection. The paper is based on the specific challenges encountered by the researcher while doing the study of Social Compliance Audit (SCA). This paper draws from two bouts of fieldwork; each very different from the other. My first encounter is with the practice of SCA as a graduate of sociology, working in the corporate sector as a social compliance auditor. My second as a scholar enrolled for PhD program researching on social compliance audit. The two locations offered very different vantage points of enquiry. As an auditor, my brief was laid out; a given whose protocols I had to follow. SCA was a known and necessary entity for the managerial staff in the garment industry. As a PhD scholar I realized it was virtually unknown in the academic community of sociology, even within studies on labor. There are two clear challenges that I faced while conducting fieldwork for my PhD. One, that SCA was relatively unfamiliar as an object for sociological enquiry. And two, the predicaments of doing qualitative research on sites and people who had their own ideas of how SCA ought to be studies. Here, the field encountered is analysed as a method of knowledge production and the ethnographer is placed at the centre of drama.
AliM. A. (2005). Globalization and industrial relations of China, India, and South Korea: An argument for divergence (Seminar Research Paper Series, Paper No. 17). http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/lrc_paper_series/17
2.
BarrientosS., & SmithS. (2007). Do workers benefit from ethical trade? Assessing codes of labour practice in global production systems. Third World Quarterly, 28(4), 713–729.
3.
BasuK. (2001). International labour standards. Blackwell, EGD.
4.
BeemanB. (2019). Business anthropology fieldwork problems in the 21st century. Journal of Business Anthropology, 8(1), 25–28. https://rauli.cbs.dk/index.php/jba/article/view/5712/6360
5.
BhowmickS. (2012). Industry, labour and society. Orient Blackswan.
6.
BlackettA., & TrebilcockA. (Eds.). (2015). Research handbook of transnational labour law UK. Edwar Elgar.
7.
BøåsM., JenningsK. M. & ShawT. M. (2006). Dealing with conflicts and emergency situations. In DesaiV. and PotterR. B. (Eds.), Doing development research (pp. 70–78). SAGE.
8.
BremanJ. (2004). The making and unmaking of an industrial working class; Sliding down the labour hierarchy in Ahmedabad, India. Oxford University Press.
9.
CarrollA. B., & BeilerG. W. (1975). Landmarks in the evolution of the social audit. Academy of Management Journal, 18(3), 589–599.
10.
ChakravartyD. (1989). Rethinking working class history: Bengal 1890–1940. Princeton.
11.
ChandavarkarR. (1994). The origins of industrial capitalism in India: Business strategies and the working classes in Bombay, 1900–40. Cambridge University Press.
ChaudhuriM. (2017). Refashioning India: Gender, media and a transformed public discourse. Orient Blackswan.
14.
CompaL. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and workers’ rights. Comparative Labor Law and Polity Journal, 30(1), 1–10.
15.
CooperC., NeuD., & LehmanG. (2003). Globalisation and its discontents: A concern about growth and globalization. Accounting Forum, 27(4), 359–364.
16.
De NeveG. (2009). Power, inequality and corporate social responsibility: The politics of ethical compliance in the South Indian garment industry. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(22), 63–71.
17.
De NeveG. (2005). The everyday politics of labour: Working lives in India’s informal economy. Berghahn Books.
18.
FergusonJ. (1994). The anti-politics machine: Development, depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. University of Minnesota.
19.
GereffiG., & KorzeniewiczM. (Eds.). (1994). Commodity chains and global capitalism. Praeger.
20.
GouldnerA. W. (1959). Organizational analysis. In MertonR. K., BroomL., & CottrellL. S.Jr. (Eds.), Sociology today: Problems and prospects (Vol. 2, pp. 400–428). Harper Torchbook.
21.
HunterP., & UrminskyM. (2003). Social auditing, freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining. Labour Education, 130(1), 47–53.
22.
International Labour Organization (ILO). (1998a, September28). Export processing zones growing steadily, providing a major source of job creation. Press Release. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/inf/magazine/27/news.htm
23.
International Labour Organization (ILO). (1998b). Private initiatives and labour standards: A global look. ILO, Geneva. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/dialogue/sector/papers/labourstandards.pdf
24.
JonathanP. (1999). Preface. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 33(1–2), 7–14.
25.
JoshiC. (2003). The lost world: Indian labour and its forgotten history. Permanent Black.
26.
KellyJ. D., JaureguiB., MitchellS. T., & WaltonJ. (Eds.). (2010). Anthropology and global counterinsurgency. University of Chicago Press.
27.
KungL., ArrigoL. G., & SalaffJ. (1984). Doing fieldwork. In SheridanM., & SalaffJ. W. (Eds.), Lives: Chinese working women (pp. 95–108). Indiana University Press.
28.
LambertR. D. (2017). Workers, factories and social changes in India. Princeton University Press.
29.
LindgreenA., SwaenV., MaonF., AndersenM., & Skjoett-LarsenT. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14, 75–86.
30.
MarcusG. E. (1999). What is at stake—And is not—In the idea and practice of multi-sited ethnography. Canberra Anthropology, 22(2), 6–14.
31.
MarksM., & AbdelhalimJ. (2018). Introduction: Identity, jeopardy and moral dilemmas in conducting research in risky environments. Contemporary Social Science, 13(3–4), 305–322.
32.
MezzadriA. (2010). Globalisation, informalisation and the state in the Indian garment industry. International Review of Sociology, 20(3), 491–511.
33.
MillsC. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press.
34.
MoraisR. J., & de Waal MalefytT. (2014). Ethics in business anthropology: Crossing boundaries. Journal of Business Anthropology, 1(1), 1–10.
35.
PedersenE. R., & AndersenM. (2006). Safeguarding corporate social responsibility (CSR) in global supply chains: how codes of conduct are managed in buyer- supplier relationships. Journal of Public Affairs: An International Journal, 6(3–4), 228–240.
36.
PrasadA. (2018). Private labour regulation and workers’ rights in India. Palm Leaf Publications and Winshield.
37.
RamaswamyE. A. (1988). Worker consciousness and trade union response. Oxford University Press.
38.
StrathernM. (1987). The limits of auto-anthropology. In JacksonA. (Ed.), Anthropology at home (pp. 59–67). Tavistock. https://monoskop.org/images/b/b3/Strathern_Marilyn_1987_The_Limits_of_Auto-Anthropology.pdf
39.
SurendraA. (2018). Towards a reconsideration of industrial sociology in India. In ChaudhuriM., & ThakurM. (Eds.), Doing theory: Locations, hierarchies and disjunctions (pp. 127–148). Orient Blackswan.
40.
SrinivasM. N. (1996). Indian society through personal writings. Oxford University Press.
41.
UNIDO. (1980). Export processing zones in developing countries. UNIDO.
42.
UrminskyM. (2003). Corporate/public reporting on labour and employment issues. Labour Education, 1(130), 55–61.
43.
Van GennepA.1960. The rites of passage (English trans. 1960 M.B. Vizedom and G.L. Caffee). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
