Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The article examines the assimilation dynamics and functioning of ethnic organisations of a small immigrant Bengali community in the Kansas City, USA. Indian Bengalis in Overland Park (a suburban neighbourhood) formed a closely knit group and bonding social capital was sustained through activities of ethnic associations, consumption of ethnic amenities, and through weekend parties/get-togethers. Such ethnic bonding and meagre ethnic/racial diversity in the city (compared to the larger cities of the USA) are found to be contributing to slow and limited assimilation of Bengalis to the American society. These findings challenge the existing erudition that assimilation increases with improvement in socio-economic standing and suburbanisation of immigrants. Further, the article finds that assimilation there is segmental and ethnic associations not only provide a comfort zone to the immigrants in a culturally and racially different country but also play a prominent role in preserving the ethnic identity of its members.

Keywords

Assimilation heterolocalism ethnic amenities ethnic identity bonding social capital

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alba

R. D.

, & Nee

(1997). Rethinking assimilation theory for a new era of immigration. International Migration Review, 31, 826–874.

Alba

R. D.

, & Logan

J. R.

(1993). Minority proximity to Whites in suburbs: An individual-level analysis of segregation. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1388–1427.

Bacon

(1996). Life lines: Community family, and assimilation among Asian Indian immigrants. Oxford University Press.

Basch

, Schiller

N. G.

, & Blanc

C. S.

(1994). Nations unbound: Transnational projects, postcolonial predicaments, and deterritorialized nation-states. Gordon and Breach.

Bhat

, & Bhaskar

T. L. S.

(2007). Contextualizing diasporic identity: Implications of time and space on Telugu immigrants. In Oonk

(Ed.), Global Indian diasporas: Exploring trajectories of migration and theory (pp. 89–118). Amsterdam University Press.

Brettell

C. B.

(2012). The spatial, social, and political incorporation of Asian Indian immigrants in Dallas. Reprinted In Sahoo

A. Kumar

, Baas

, & Faist

(Eds.) Indian diaspora and transnationalism. Rawat Publications.

Dhingra

(2003). The second generation in ‘big D’: Korean American and Indian American organizations in Dallas, Texas. Sociological Spectrum, 23, 247–278.

Fernandez

(1998). Asian Indian Americans in the Bay Area and the glass ceiling. Sociological Perspectives, 41(1), 119–149.

Fisher

M. P.

(1980). The Indians of New York City: A study of immigrants from India (pp. 93–97). Heritage Publishers.

10.

Gibson

M. A.

(1988). Accommodation without assimilation: Sikh immigrants in an American high school. Cornell University Press.

11.

Gordon

M. M.

(1964). Assimilation in American life: The role of race, religion and national origins (pp. 80–81). Oxford University Press.

12.

Gosine

(1990). Caribbean East-Indians in America: Assimilation, adaptation and group experience (pp. 24–25). Winder Press.

13.

Judge

P. S.

(2011). Diversity within the Punjabi diaspora and the construction of nationhood. In Jayaram

(Ed.), Diversities in the Indian diaspora: Nature, implications, responses (pp. 43–44). Oxford University Press.

14.

Khandelwal

M. S.

(1995). Indian immigrants in Queens, New York City: Patterns of spatial concentration and distribution, 1965–1990. In van der Veer

(Ed.), Nation and migration: The politics of space in the South Asian diaspora (pp. 178–196). University of Pennsylvania Press.

15.

Klaff

V. Z.

(1980). Pluralism as an alternative model for the human ecologist. Ethnicity, 7, 102–118.

16.

Massey

D. S.

(1981). Hispanic residential segregation: A comparison of Mexicans, Cubans, and Puerto Ricans. Sociology and Social Research, 65(3), 311–322.

17.

Park

R. E.

(1930). Assimilation, social. In Seligman

E. R. A.

, & Johnson

(Eds.), Encyclopedia of the social sciences (p. 281). Macmillan.

18.

Park

R. E.

, & Burgess

E. W.

(1921). Introduction to the science of sociology (p. 735). University of Chicago Press.

19.

Piore

(1979). Birds of passage: Migrant labor in industrial societies (pp. 141–166). Cambridge University Press.

20.

Rangaswamy

(2000). Namaste America: Indian immigrants in an American metropolis (pp. 308–309). State University Press.

21.

Ratner

(1987). Horace M. Kallen and cultural pluralism, In Konvitz

M. R.

(Ed.). The legacy of Horace M. Kallen (pp. 48–63). Associated University Press.

22.

Ruiz

N. G.

(2015). Indian migration to the U.S. Pew Research Centre. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/indian-migration-to-the-us.pdf

23.

Smith

(2005). Mexican New York: Transnational lives of new immigrants. University of California Press.

24.

US Census Bureau (2010). United State Census Bureau 2010.

25.

US Census Bureau (2017). United State Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045217

26.

Zelinsky

, & Lee

B. A.

(1998). Heterolocalism: An alternative model of the socio-spatial behavior of immigrant ethnic communities. Population, Space and Place, 4(4), 281–364.

27.

Zong

, & Batalova

(2017, August). Indian immigrants in the United States. Migration Policy Institute. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/indian-immigrants-united-states

Assimilation,Heterolocalism and Ethnic Capital: The Case of an Immigrant Indian Community in America

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References