Taking advantage of historical census records that include full first and last names, we apply a new approach to measuring the effect of cultural assimilation on economic success for the children of the last great wave of immigrants to the United States. We created a quantitative index of ethnic distinctiveness of first names and show the consequences of ethnic-sounding names for the occupational achievement of the adult children of European immigrants. We find a consistent tendency for the children of Irish, Italian, German, and Polish immigrants with more “American”-sounding names to have higher occupational achievement. About one-third of this effect appears to be due to social class differences in name-giving, and the remaining two-thirds to signaling effects of the names themselves. An exception is found for Russian, predominantly Jewish, immigrants, where we find a positive effect of ethnic naming on occupational achievement. The divergent effects of our new measure of cultural assimilation, sometimes hurting and sometimes helping, lend historical empirical support to more recent theories of the advantages of different paths to assimilation. The effects of ethnic first names are also found for a restricted analysis of recognizably ethnic last names, suggesting that immigrants’ success depended on being perceived as making an effort to assimilate rather than hiding their origins.
AlbaRichard D.NeeVictor. 2005. Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
AraiMahmoodThoursiePeter Skogman. 2009. “Renouncing Personal Names: An Empirical Examination of Surname Change and Earnings.”Journal of Labor Economics27(1):127–47.
4.
BergerJonahLe MensGaël. 2009. “How Adoption Speed Affects the Abandonment of Cultural Tastes.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences106(20):8146–50.
5.
BerksonJoseph. 1950. “Are There Two Regressions?”Journal of the American Statistical Association45(250):164–80.
6.
BertrandMarianneMullainathanSendhil. 2004. “Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination.”American Economic Review94(4):991–1013.
7.
BesnardPhilippeDesplanquesGuy. 2001. “Temporal Stratification of Taste: The Social Diffusion of First Names.”Revue française de sociologie42(1):65–77.
8.
BialHenry. 2005. Acting Jewish: Negotiating Ethnicity on the American Stage & Screen. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
9.
BondRobert M.FarissChristopher J.JonesJason J.KramerAdam D. I.MarlowCameronSettleJaime E.FowlerJames H.2012. “A 61-Million-Person Experiment in Social Influence and Political Mobilization.”Nature489(7415):295–98.
10.
BrubakerRogers. 2001. “The Return of Assimilation? Changing Perspectives on Immigration and Its Sequels in France, Germany, and the United States.”Ethnic and Racial Studies24(4):531–48.
11.
BuhlePaul. 2004. From the Lower East Side to Hollywood: Jews in American Popular Culture. New York: Verso.
12.
CarlssonMagnus. 2010. “Experimental Evidence of Discrimination in the Hiring of First- and Second-Generation Immigrants.”Labour24(3):263–78.
13.
ClarkGregory. 2014. The Son Also Rises: Surnames and the History of Social Mobility. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
ClarkGregoryCumminsNeil. 2015. “Intergenerational Mobility in England, 1858–2012: Wealth, Surnames, and Social Mobility.”Economic Journal125(582):61–85.
15.
CookLisa D.LoganTrevon D.ParmanJohn M.2014. “Distinctively Black Names in the American Past.”Explorations in Economic History53:64–82.
16.
CoulmontBaptiste. 2011. Sociologie des Prénoms. Paris: La Découverte.
17.
DuncanOtis Dudley. 1961. “A Socioeconomic Index for All Occupations.” Pp. 109–138 in Occupations and Social Status, edited by ReissA. J.New York: Free Press.
18.
DurbinJames. 1954. “Errors in Variables.”Revue de l’Institut International de Statistique / Review of the International Statistical Institute22(1/3):23–32.
19.
ElchardusMarkSiongersJessy. 2011. “First Names as Collective Identifiers: An Empirical Analysis of the Social Meanings of First Names.”Cultural Sociology5(3):403–422.
20.
FryerRoland G.LevittSteven D.2004. “The Causes and Consequences of Distinctively Black Names.”Quarterly Journal of Economics119(3):767–805.
21.
GerhardsJürgenHackenbrochRolf. 2000. “Trends and Causes of Cultural Modernization: An Empirical Study of First Names.”International Sociology15(3):501–531.
22.
GerhardsJürgenHansSilke. 2009. “From Hasan to Herbert: Name-Giving Patterns of Immigrant Parents between Acculturation and Ethnic Maintenance.”American Journal of Sociology114(4): 1102–28.
23.
GolderScott A.MacyMichael W.2011. “Diurnal and Seasonal Mood Vary with Work, Sleep, and Daylength across Diverse Cultures.”Science333(6051):1878–81.
24.
GordonMilton M.1961. “Assimilation in America: Theory and Reality.”Daedalus90(2):263–85.
25.
GordonMilton M.1964. Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion and National Origins. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
HackerJ. David. 1999. “Child Naming, Religion, and the Decline of Marital Fertility in Nineteenth-Century America.”History of the Family4(3):339–65.
27.
HoutMichaelGoldsteinJoshua R.1994. “How 4.5 Million Irish Immigrants Became 40 Million Irish-Americans: Demographic and Subjective Aspects of the Ethnic Composition of White Americans.”American Sociological Review59(1):64–82.
28.
KahanArcadius. 1978. “Economic Opportunities and Some Pilgrims’ Progress: Jewish Immigrants from Eastern Europe in the U.S., 1890–1914.”Journal of Economic History38(1):235–51.
29.
KasinitzPhilip. 2008. “Becoming American, Becoming Minority, Getting Ahead: The Role of Racial and Ethnic Status in the Upward Mobility of the Children of Immigrants.”ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science620(1):253–69.
30.
LiWentian. 2012. “Analyses of Baby Name Popularity Distribution in U.S. for the Last 131 Years.”Complexity18(1):44–50.
31.
LiebersonStanley. 2010. A Matter of Taste: How Names, Fashions, and Culture Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32.
LiebersonStanleyMikelsonKelly S.1995. “Distinctive African American Names: An Experimental, Historical, and Linguistic Analysis of Innovation.”American Sociological Review60(6):928–46.
33.
MasseyDouglas S.1981. “Dimensions of the New Immigration to the United States and the Prospects for Assimilation.”Annual Review of Sociology7:57–85.
34.
MoserPetra. 2012. “Taste-Based Discrimination Evidence from a Shift in Ethnic Preferences after WWI.”Explorations in Economic History49(2):167–88.
ObukhovaElenaZuckermanEzra W.ZhangJiayin. 2014. “When Politics Froze Fashion: The Effect of the Cultural Revolution on Naming in Beijing.”American Journal of Sociology120(2):555–83.
37.
PerlmannJoelWaldingerRoger. 1997. “Second Generation Decline? Children of Immigrants, Past and Present – A Reconsideration.”International Migration Review31(4):893–922.
38.
PortesAlejandro. 1987. “The Social Origins of the Cuban Enclave Economy of Miami.”Sociological Perspectives30(4):340–72.
39.
AlejandroPortes, ed. 1996. The New Second Generation. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
40.
PortesAlejandroRumbautRubén G.2012. “Children of Immigrants Longitudinal Study (CILS), 1991–2006.” Retrieved November15, 2015 (http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20520.v2).
41.
PortesAlejandroZhouMin. 1993. “The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants.”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science530(1):74–96.
42.
ReberArthur S.1996. Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge: An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious. New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
RischinMoses. 1977. The Promised City: New York’s Jews, 1870–1914. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
RooseveltTheodore. 1915. “Roosevelt Bars the Hyphenated.”New York Times, October13.
45.
RossiAlice S.1965. “Naming Children in Middle-Class Families.”American Sociological Review30(4):499–513.
46.
RugglesSteven. 2014. “Big Microdata for Population Research.”Demography51(1):287–97.
47.
RugglesStevenAlexanderJ. TrentGenadekKatieGoekenRonaldSchroederMatthew B.SobekMatthew. 2010. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 5.0 [Machine-Readable Database]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
48.
RumbautRuben G.1997. “Paradoxes (and Orthodoxies) of Assimilation.”Sociological Perspectives40(3):483–511.
49.
SavageMikeBurrowsRoger. 2007. “The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology.”Sociology41(5):885–99.
StevensGillianFeathermanDavid L.1981. “A Revised Socioeconomic Index of Occupational Status.”Social Science Research10(4):364–95.
53.
SueChristina A.TellesEdward E.2007. “Assimilation and Gender in Naming.”American Journal of Sociology112(5):1383–1415.
54.
WarnerW. LloydSroleLeo. 1945. The Social Systems of American Ethnic Groups. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
55.
WatersMary C.1990. Ethnic Options: Choosing Identities in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
56.
WatersMary C.1994. “Ethnic and Racial Identities of Second-Generation Black Immigrants in New York City.”International Migration Review28(4):795–820.
57.
WatersMary C.JiménezTomás R.2005. “Assessing Immigrant Assimilation: New Empirical and Theoretical Challenges.”Annual Review of Sociology31(1):105–25.
58.
WatkinsSusan CottsLondonAndrew S.1994. “Personal Names and Cultural Change: A Study of the Naming Patterns of Italians and Jews in the United States in 1910.”Social Science History18(2):169–209.
59.
WilsonKenneth L.PortesAlejandro. 1980. “Immigrant Enclaves: An Analysis of the Labor Market Experiences of Cubans in Miami.”American Journal of Sociology86(2):295–319.
60.
ZhangJiayinZuckermanEzra W.ObukhovaElena. Forthcoming. “A Lack of Security or of Cultural Capital? Acculturative Conservatism in the Naming Choices of Early 20th-Century U.S. Jews.”Social Forces.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
