Urban livability is an important factor in decisions regarding modern urban construction. Based on multi-agent modeling theory, a model of the changes in urban safety livability is proposed to analyze the present situation and the trends in urban safety livability in complex urban systems. Considering safety as an example, five environmental indicators, namely public security, fire protection, traffic, emergency response, and residence, are selected. The interactive dynamic feedback mechanisms among resident decision-making behaviors and urban safety livability in the context of these five indicators and relevant policies are provided. A simulation of the changes in urban safety livability is implemented based on resident behaviors. The results show that the multi-agent modeling method is effective for analyzing urban safety livability and can provide decision support for urban development planning.
ZanellaACamanhoASDiasTG.The assessment of cities’ livability integrating human wellbeing and environmental impact. Ann Oper Res2015; 226: 695–726.
2.
DengMHua-RongTU.Construction and management of livable regional central city. Transp Standard2011; 31: 1769–1778.
3.
ZhangW.Index system and method of residential environmental evaluation in inner cities. Scientia Geographica Sinica2007; 27: 17–23.
4.
LongYLiMLiJ.Monitoring built environment of China with new data: indicator system and case studies. Urban Develop Stud2018; 25: 92–102.
5.
KhorasaniMZarghamfardM.Analyzing the impacts of spatial factors on livability of peri-urban villages. Soc Indicat Res2018; 136: 693–717.
6.
SofeskaE.Understanding the livability in a city through smart solutions and urban planning toward developing sustainable livable future of the city of Skopje. Procedia Environ Sci2017; 37: 442–453.
7.
Okulicz-KozarynAValenteRR.Livability and subjective well-being across European cities. Appl Res Qual Life2018; 3: 1–24.
8.
LiPHuY. Comprehensive evaluation of Chinese urban living environments. In: 2014 international conference on construction and real estate management (eds LiPHuY), 27–28 September 2015, Paper No. 9780784413777.184, pp.211–216. Kunming, Yunnan, China: Iccrem.
9.
YuDFangCDanX, et al. Assessing urban public safety via indicator-based evaluating method: a systemic view of Shanghai. Soc Indicat Res2014; 117: 89–104.
10.
MaiTSmithC.Scenario-based planning for tourism development using system dynamic modelling: a case study of Cat Ba Island, Vietnam. Tourism Manag2018; 68: 336–354.
LouieCarleyKM. Balancing the criticisms: validating multi-agent models of social systems. Simulat Model Pract Theor2008; 16: 242–256.
13.
HanYFangBJiaY.Predicting the topic influence trends in social media with multiple models. Neurocomputing2014; 144: 463–470.
14.
LiuXZhangKXieWC.Consensus seeking in multi-agent systems via hybrid protocols with impulse delays. Nonlin Anal Hybrid Syst2017; 25: 90–98.
15.
SinghDLinPLoganB.Integrating BDI agents with agent-based simulation platforms. Auton Agent Multi Agent Syst2016; 30: 1050–1071.
16.
ZhuYMeiSZhengT, et al. Agent modeling based heavy infectious diseases simulation system analysis. J Syst Simulat2011; 23: 2505–2511.
17.
AlmeidaSJDFerreiraRPMEirasÁE, et al. Multi-agent modeling and simulation of an Aedes aegypti mosquito population. Environ Model Softw2010; 25: 1490–1507.
18.
Fernandez-AnezVFernández-GüellJMGiffingerR.Smart City implementation and discourses: an integrated conceptual model. The case of Vienna. Cities2018; 78: 4–16.
19.
MezicIMezicJBrantinghamJP, et al. Nonlinear dynamics of crime and violence in urban settings. J Artif Soc Simulat2012; 15: 2–3.
20.
SepasgozarSMEHawkenSSargolzaeiS, et al. Implementing citizen centric technology in developing smart cities: a model for predicting the acceptance of urban technologies. Technol Forecast Soc Change2018; 142: 105–116.
21.
AdeltaFWeyeraJHoffmannaS, et al. Simulation of the governance of complex systems (SimCo): basic concepts and experiments on urban transportation. J Artif Soc Soc Simulat2018; 21: 2–6.
22.
OlafssonASSkov-PetersenH.The use of GIS-based support of recreational trail planning by local governments. Appl Spat Anal Pol2014; 7: 149–68.
23.
FengXWeiYHuanC, et al. Population expansion and polycentric development of Nanjing city in a period of hyper-growth. Geogr Res2013; 32: 711–719.
24.
LuoJTangM.A preliminary study on urban planning model based on ABM. Technol Informat2015; 14: 10–11.
25.
KlabundeAWillekensF.Decision-making in agent-based models of migration: state of the art and challenges. Eur J Populat2016; 32: 73–97.
26.
FuZHaoL.Agent-based modeling of China’s rural-urban migration and social network structure. Physica A Stat Mech Appl2018; 490: 1061–1075.
27.
RastyapinaOAKorostelevaNV.Urban safety development methods. Procedia Eng2016; 150: 2042–2048.
28.
HuangDFanY.A study on the quality of scenic spot’s development and management based on the evaluation of residents’ satisfaction. Tourism Tribune2018; 33: 98–104.
29.
MoyaIChicaMSáez-LozanoJ, et al. An agent-based model for understanding the influence of the 11-M terrorist attacks on the 2004 Spanish elections. Knowl Based Syst2017; 123: 200–216.
30.
ManeeratSDaudéE.A spatial agent-based simulation model of the dengue vector Aedes aegypti to explore its population dynamics in urban areas. Ecol Model2016; 3339: 66–78.
31.
ChenYMWangBY.A study on modeling of human spatial behavior using multi-agent technique. Expert Syst Appl2012; 39: 3048–3060.
32.
JingWU.Structural equation modeling of urban and rural residents’ happiness. J Bus Econ2009; 210: 66–72.
33.
BalsasCJL. Measuring the livability of an urban centre: an exploratory study of key performance indicators. Plann Pract Res2004; 19: 101–110.
34.
HatvaniLKrisztinT.A study of satisfaction for dwelling life and consciousness on living environment of residents of Yunnan District in China. J Hum Liv Environ2013; 20: 371–384.
35.
LiuXZhangL.Determinants of human settlement satisfaction and settlement intention of residents with public housing in China: an empirical study in Xi’an. Mod Urban Res2018; 23: 114–123.
36.
AnabestaniAAnabestaniZHeydariA.Analysis the satisfaction of the residents of Golbahar New Town with the living conditions and its effects on Mashhad Metropolis. 2016; 126: 105–110.
37.
SaitluangaBL.Spatial pattern of urban livability in Himalayan region: a case of Aizawl City, India. Soc Indicat Res2014; 117: 541–559.
38.
HorstiKPellanderS.Conditions of cultural citizenship: intersections of gender, race and age in public debates on family migration. Citiz Stud2015; 19: 751–767.
39.
HeDChenXShaoN.Influencing factors of family migration and residence of floating population. Urban Iss2016; 24: 94–103.
40.
LiuWZhuJ.Research progress of resources and environmental carrying capacity: from the perspective of the comprehensive study of geography. Chin Populat Resour Environ2017; 27: 75–86.
41.
XiaZXuLWanP.Pedestrian distribution, space and function in high-rise commercial complex, a case study of three rail transit commercial complexes in Shanghai and Hong Kong. J Archit2015; 5: 103–108.
42.
KonukFA.The effects of price consciousness and sale proneness on purchase intention towards expiration date-based priced perishable foods. Br Food J2015; 117: 793–804.
BatemanIJJonesAPLovettAA, et al. Applying geographical information systems (GIS) to environmental and resource economics. Environ Resour Econ2002; 22: 219–269.
45.
ZhangXFangCWangZ, et al. Urban construction land suitability evaluation based on improved multi-criteria evaluation based on GIS (MCE-GIS): case of New Hefei City, China. Chin Geogr Sci2013; 23: 740–753.
46.
LefèvreB.Long-term energy consumptions of urban transportation: A prospective simulation of “transport–land uses” policies in Bangalore. Energ Pol2009; 37: 940–953.
