Previous research has shown that empathic concern has positive implications for psychological well-being. The purpose of this research is to examine how masculine God imagery moderates this association. Using data from a nationwide sample of adults in South Korea (n = 1,498), the analyses reveal that empathic concern is positively associated with both life satisfaction and happiness net of religious and demographic controls. Importantly, masculine God imagery modifies the association between empathic concern and life satisfaction. Specifically, empathic concern is positively associated with life satisfaction among individuals who do not endorse beliefs in a masculine God. By contrast, empathic concern is not associated with life satisfaction among those who believe that God is masculine. Yet, this moderating effect of masculine God imagery does not emerge with regard to happiness. Collectively, these observations suggest that masculine God imagery is a critical contingency in the relationship between empathic concern and life satisfaction.
Aldredge-ClantonJann. 2001. In Whose Image? God and Gender. Revised ed. New York, NY: Crossroads Publishing.
2.
AndrewsKatherineLaricciaLilianaTalwarVictoriaBosackiSandra. 2021. “Empathetic Concern in Emerging Adolescents: The Role of Theory of Mind and Gender Roles.”The Journal of Early Adolescence41(9):1394–424. doi:10.1177/02724316211002258.
3.
ArensElisabeth A.ChristoffelMurielStangierUlrich. 2022. “Value Priorities and Value Conflicts in Patients with Mental Disorders Compared to a General Population Sample.”Scientific Reports12:3974. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-07758-4.
4.
BakerJoseph O.WhiteheadAndrew L.2020. “God’s Penology: Belief in a Masculine God Predicts Support for Harsh Criminal Punishment and Militarism.”Punishment & Society22(2):135–60. doi:10.1177/1462474519850570.
5.
CarrardValerieBourquinCelineBerneySylvieSchlegelKatjaGaumeJacquesBartPieree-AlexandrePresigMartinMastMarianne SchmidBerneyAlexandre. 2022. “The Relationship between Medical Students’ Empathy, Mental Health, and Burnout: A Cross-Sectional Study.”Medical Teacher44(12):1392–99. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2022.2098708.
6.
CasseseErin C.HolmanMirya R.2017. “Religion, Gendered Authority, and Identity in American Politics.”Politics and Religion10(1):31–56. doi:10.1017/S1755048316000407.
7.
ChoiHeejeongNamBoramKimSeongeunParkChulwoong. 2019. “Contact with Parents and Parents-in-Law, Gender, and Marital Satisfaction in Korea.”Journal of Marriage and Family81(5):1192–205. doi:10.1111/jomf.12594.
8.
ChopikWilliam J.O’BrienEdKonrathSara H.2017. “Differences in Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking Across 63 Countries.”Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology48(1):23–38. doi:10.1177/0022022116673910.
9.
ChristCarol. 1987. “Toward a Paradigm Shift in the Academy and in Religious Studies.” Pp. 53–76 in The Impact of Feminist Research in the Academy, edited by FarnhamC.Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
10.
CopelandMollyKamisChristina. 2025. “Gendered Social Chains of Risk: Pathways of Childhood Maltreatment, Adolescent Peer Networks, and Depressive Symptoms.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior 0(0). doi:10.1177/00221465251333064.
11.
DavisMark H.1983. “Measuring Individual Differences in Empathy: Evidence for a Multidimensional Approach.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology44(1):113–26. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113.
12.
DavisMark H.1994. Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach. New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780429493898.
13.
DavisMark H.2015. “Empathy and Prosocial Behavior.” Pp. 282–306 in The Oxford Handbook of Prosocial Behavior, edited by SchroederD. A.GrazianoW. G.New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399813.013.026.
DienerEdKahnemanDanielTovWilliamAroradRaksha. 2010. “Income’s Association with Judgments of Life versus Feelings.” Pp. 3–15 in International Differences in Well-Being, edited by DienerE.KahnemanD.HelliwellJ.New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732739.003.0001.
16.
FestingerLeon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17.
GambinMalgorzataSharpCarla. 2016. “The Differential Relations between Empathy and Internalizing and Externalizing Symptoms in Inpatient Adolescents.”Child Psychiatry & Human Development47(6):966–74. doi:10.1007/s10578-016-0625-8.
18.
GleichgerrchtEzequielDecetyJean. 2013. “Empathy in Clinical Practice: How Individual Dispositions, Gender, and Experience Moderate Empathic Concern, Burnout, and Emotional Distress in Physicians.”PLoS One8(4):e61526. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061526.
19.
GraweKlaus. 2007. Neuropsychotherapy: How the Neurosciences Inform Effective Psychotherapy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
20.
GreenLindsey M.MissottenLiesToneErin B.LuyckxKoen. 2018. “Empathy, Depressive Symptoms, and Self-Esteem in Adolescence: The Moderating Role of the Mother–Adolescent Relationship.”Journal of Child and Family Studies27(12):3964–74. doi:10.1007/s10826-018-1216-z.
21.
HossliNilsNatterMartinAlgesheimerRené. 2024. “On the Importance of Congruence between Personal and Work Values – How Value Incongruence Affects Job Satisfaction: A Multiple Mediation Model.”International Journal of Wellbeing14(3):1–18. doi:10.5502/ijw.v14i3.2905.
22.
HuangHeqingLiuYanchunSuYanjie. 2020. “What Is the Relationship between Empathy and Mental Health in Preschool Teachers: The Role of Teaching Experience.”Frontiers in Psychology11:1366. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01366.
23.
IngogliaSoniaLo CocoAlidaAlbieroPaolo. 2016. “Development of a Brief Form of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (B–IRI).”Journal of Personality Assessment98(5):461–71. doi:10.1080/00223891.2016.1149858.
24.
JeonNanum. 2023. “Swapping Gender Traditionalism: Christianity, Buddhism, and Gender Ideology in South Korea.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion62(2):336–58. doi:10.1111/jssr.12826.
25.
KarniolRachelGabayRiviOchionYaelHarariYael. 1998. “Is Gender or Gender-Role Orientation a Better Predictor of Empathy in Adolescence”Sex Roles39(1):45–59. doi:10.1023/A:1018825732154.
26.
KrauseNeal. 2005. “God-Mediated Control and Psychological Well-Being in Later Life.”Research on Aging27(2):125–40. doi:10.1177/0164027504270475.
27.
KrolSonia A.BartzJennifer A.2022. “The Self and Empathy: Lacking a Clear and Stable Sense of Self Undermines Empathy and Helping Behavior.”Emotion22(7):1554–71. doi:10.1037/emo0000943.
28.
LamotheMartinBoujutEmilieZenasniFranckSultanSerge. 2014. “To Be or Not to Be Empathic: The Combined Role of Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking in Understanding Burnout in General Practice.”BMC Family Practice15(1):15. doi:10.1186/1471-2296-15-15.
29.
McDougleLindseyHandyFemidaKonrathSaraWalkMarlene. 2014. “Health Outcomes and Volunteering: The Moderating Role of Religiosity.”Social Indicators Research117(2):337–51. doi:10.1007/s11205-013-0336-5.
OlsonLaura R.WarberAdam L.2008. “Belonging, Behaving, and Believing: Assessing the Role of Religion on Presidential Approval.”Political Research Quarterly61(2):192–204. doi:10.1177/1065912907313075.
32.
PalKusum K.PiagetKimZahidiSaadiaBallerSilja. 2024. Global Gender Gap 2024. Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
33.
SchiemanScottTurnerHeather A.2001. “‘When Feeling Other People’s Pain Hurts’: The Influence of Psychosocial Resources on the Association between Self-Reported Empathy and Depressive Symptoms.”Social Psychology Quarterly64(4):376. doi:10.2307/3090161.
34.
SchimmackUlrichOishiShigehiro. 2005. “The Influence of Chronically and Temporarily Accessible Information on Life Satisfaction Judgments.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology89(3):395–406. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.395.
35.
SchwartzShalom H.1994. “Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values”Journal of Social Issues50(4):19–45. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x.
36.
ShahSarahBartkowskiJohn P.XuXiaohe. 2016. “Gendered God Imagery and Attitudes toward Mothers’ Labor Force Participation: Examining the Transposable Character of Religious Schemas.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion55(3):540–57. doi:10.1111/jssr.12279.
37.
ShottSusan. 1979. “Emotion and Social Life: A Symbolic Interactionist Analysis.”American Journal of Sociology84(6):1317–34. doi:10.1086/226936.
38.
SortheixFlorencia M.LönnqvistJan-Erik. 2014. “Personal Value Priorities and Life Satisfaction in Europe: The Moderating Role of Socioeconomic Development.”Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology45(2):282–99. doi:10.1177/0022022113504621.
39.
SpenceJanet T.HelmreichRobert L.1981. “Androgyny versus Gender Schema: A Comment on Bem’s Gender Schema Theory.”Psychological Review88(4):365–68. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.365.
40.
StocksEric L.LishnerDavid A.DeckerStephanie K.2009. “Altruism or Psychological Escape: Why Does Empathy Promote Prosocial Behavior”European Journal of Social Psychology39(5):649–65. doi:10.1002/ejsp.561.
41.
SwiftHannah J.VauclairChristin-MelanieAbramsDominicBrattChristopherMarquesSibilaLimaMaria-Luisa. 2014. “Revisiting the Paradox of Well-Being: The Importance of National Context.”The Journals of Gerontology: Series B69(6):920–29. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbu011.
42.
UpenieksLauraBonhagRebecca. 2024. “Masculine God Imagery and Sense of Life Purpose: Examining Contingencies with America’s ‘Four Gods’.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion63(1):76–102. doi:10.1111/jssr.12881.
43.
VeageStephanieCiarrochiJosephDeaneFrank P.AndresenRettaOadesLindsay G.CroweTrevor P.2014. “Value Congruence, Importance and Success and in the Workplace: Links with Well-Being and Burnout amongst Mental Health Practitioners.”Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science3(4):258–64. doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2014.06.004.
44.
WatsonP. J.BidermanMichael D.SawrieSteve M.1994. “Empathy, Sex Role Orientation, and Narcissism.”Sex Roles: A Journal of Research30(9–10):701–723. doi:10.1007/BF01544671.
45.
WaiMichaelTiliopoulosNiko. 2012. “The Affective and Cognitive Empathic Nature of the Dark Triad of Personality.”Personality and Individual Differences52(7):794–99. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.008.
46.
WeiMeifenLiaoKelly Yu-HsinKuTsun-YaoShafferPhillip A.2011. “Attachment, Self-Compassion, Empathy, and Subjective Well-Being among College Students and Community Adults.”Journal of Personality79(1):191–221. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00677.x.
47.
WhiteheadAndrew L.2012. “Gender Ideology and Religion: Does a Masculine Image of God Matter?”Review of Religious Research54(2):139–56. Retrieved (https://www.jstor.org/stable/41940774).
48.
WhiteheadAndrew L.2014. “Male and Female ‘He’ Created Them: Gender Traditionalism, Masculine Images of God, and Attitudes toward Same-Sex Unions.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion53(3):479–96. doi:10.1111/jssr.12130.
49.
WillerRobWimerChristopherOwensLindsay A.2015. “What Drives the Gender Gap in Charitable Giving? Lower Empathy Leads Men to Give Less to Poverty Relief.”Social Science Research52:83–98. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.12.014.
