Abstract
Despite female religious leaders’ substantial historic and ongoing contributions worldwide, their experiences remain poorly understood in male-normative contexts, especially from an empirical perspective. This lack of understanding leads institutions to overlook heterogeneity and perpetuate male-normed formative experiences, with virtually no empirical studies investigating gender differences among religious leaders, particularly regarding mental health. The present study utilized a sample of 452 emerging religious leaders (50.2%, women) and a series of t-tests and ANCOVAs on self-report measures across domains of spirituality, character, emotional/mental health, and social values. Overall, women reported significantly higher character strengths and social justice values but lower emotional/mental health than men, even after controlling for covariates. Men reported higher Narcissism-Grandiosity and Spirituality, while women reported higher Narcissism-Vulnerability, though the Narcissism-Grandiosity effect disappeared after controlling for covariates. The authors identify potential drivers of differences and disparities while proposing recommendations for stakeholders in religious communities and higher education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
