Higher education institutions are heavily reliant on part-time adjuncts to teach their students. These part-time adjuncts now account for the majority of faculty in the United States. This qualitative study utilizes a phenomenological approach to explore the essence of the lived experiences of part-time adjuncts who travel to more than one university in their work roles. This study utilized semi-structured interviews with eight traveling adjuncts. The interview questions were based on: the theory of underemployment, employee engagement theory, and the learned helplessness model. While higher education institutions are reliant on adjunct faculty for their survival, the findings uncovered negative factors within the work environment which included job dissatisfaction, low pay, and little or no benefits. The implications and recommendations of these findings and recommendations for future research are also discussed.
American Federation of Teachers Higher Education (2010) American Academic: A National Survey of Part-Time/Adjunct Faculty. Volume 2. USA: American Federation of Teachers Higher Education.
3.
Antony J and Hayden R (2011) Job satisfaction of American part-time college faculty: Results from a national study a decade later. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 35(9), 689–709.
4.
AntonyJValadezJ (2001)
Job satisfaction and commitment of two-year college part-time faculty. Community College Journal of Research and Practice25: 97–108.
5.
AustenVJ (2011) “
Haven’t we heard this all before?” Contingent faculty and the unchanging times. English Studies in Canada37(1): 13–16.
6.
BaldwinRChronisterJ (2001) Teaching without Tenure: Practices and Policies for a New Era.
Baltimore, MD:
Johns Hopkins University Press.
7.
BaldwinRGWawrzynskiMR (2011)
Contingent faculty as teachers: What we know; what we need to know. American Behavioral Scientist55(11): 1485–1509.
CrossJGGoldenbergEN (2009) Off-Track Profs: Nontenured Teachers in Higher Education.
Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
10.
EaganMKJaegerA (2009)
Effects of exposure to part-time faculty on community college transfer. Research in Higher Education50(2): 168–188.
11.
FeldmanDCLeanaCRBolinoMC (2002)
Underemployment and relative deprivation among re-employed executives. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology75(4): 453–471.
12.
FinkinMW (2000)
The campaign against tenure. Academe86(3): 20–21.
13.
GappaJM (2001) Academic careers for the 21st century: More options for new faculty. In: SmartJC (ed.) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research.
Dordrecht, Netherlands:
Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp.425–475.
14.
GappaJM (2008)
Today’s majority: Faculty outside the tenure system. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning40(4): 50–54.
15.
GappaJMLeslieDW (1993) The Invisible Faculty: Improving the Status of Part-Timers in Higher Education.
San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
16.
GoldsteneC (2015)
Designed to fail: Adjunct faculty and the fight for education. Workingusa18(3): 367–375.
17.
HellerJR (2012)
Contingent faculty and the evaluation process. College Composition & Communication64(1): A8–A12.
18.
HerzbergF (1968)
One more time: How do you motivate employees?Harvard Business Review46(1): 53–62.
19.
HoytJE (2012)
Predicting the satisfaction and loyalty of adjunct faculty. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education60(3): 132–142.
20.
HoytJEHowellSLGlinesLJ, et al. (2008)
Assessing part-time faculty job satisfaction in continuing higher education: Implications for the profession. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education56(1): 27–38.
21.
JaegerAJEaganMK (2011)
Examining retention and contingent faculty use in a state system of public higher education. Educational Policy25(3): 507–537.
22.
JohnsonI (2011)
Contingent instructors and student outcomes: An artifact or a fact?Research in Higher Education52(8): 761–785.
KezarA (2013)
Examining non-tenure track faculty perceptions of how departmental policies and practices shape their performance and ability to create student learning at four-year institutions. Research in Higher Education54(5): 571–598. [10.1007/s11162-013-9288-5]
27.
KezarABernsteinSS (2016)
Contingent faculty as nonideal workers. New Directions for Higher Education2016(176): 25–35.
28.
KezarAMaxeyD (2014)
Troubling ethical lapses: The treatment of contingent faculty. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning46(4): 34–37.
29.
KezarASamC (2011)
Understanding non-tenure track faculty new assumptions and theories for conceptualizing behavior. American Behavioral Scientist55(11): 1419–1442.
30.
KimmelKMFairchildJL (2017)
A full-time dilemma: Examining the experiences of part-time faculty. Journal of Effective Teaching17(1): 52–65.
31.
LangenJM (2011)
Evaluation of adjunct faculty in higher education institutions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education36(2): 185–196.
32.
LeslieDWGappaJM (2002)
Part-time faculty: Competent and committed. New Directions for Community Colleges2002(118): 59–68.
33.
MaierSSeligmanM (1976)
Learned helplessness: Theory and evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General105(1): 3–46.
34.
MaynardDJosephT (2008)
Are all part-time faculty underemployed? The influence of faculty status preference on satisfaction and commitment. Higher Education55(2): 139–154.
35.
MeixnerCKruckSEMaddenLT (2010)
Inclusion of part-time faculty for the benefit of faculty and students. College Teaching58(4): 141–147.
36.
MelonconLEnglandPIlyasovaA (2016)
A portrait of non-tenure-track faculty in technical and professional communication: Results of a pilot study. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication46(2): 206–235.
MortonDR (2012)
Adjunct faculty embraced: The institution’s responsibility. Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry9(2): 396–407.
39.
MoustakasCE (1994) Phenomenological Research Methods.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications.
40.
MuellerBMandernachBJSandersonK (2013)
Adjunct versus full-time faculty: Comparison of student outcomes in the online classroom. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching9(3): 341–352.
41.
National Center for Educational Statistics (2016) Digest of Education Statistics 2016.
Washington, DC:
Department of Education.
42.
OchoaA (2012)
Contingent faculty: Helping or harming students? Journal of the Professoriate6(1): 136–151.
43.
PalmquistMDoeSMcDonaldJ, et al. (2011)
Statement on the status and working conditions of contingent faculty: NCTE college section working group on the status and working conditions of contingent faculty. College English73(4): 356–359.
44.
SpanielSHScottJA (2013)
Community college adjunct faculty inclusion: Variations by institution type. Research in Higher Education Journal21: 1–19.
45.
UmbachPD (2007)
How effective are they? Exploring the impact of contingent faculty on undergraduate education. The Review of Higher Education30(2): 91–123.
46.
Waltman J, Bergom I, Hollenshead C, Miller J and August L (2012). Factors contributing to job satisfaction among non-tenure-track faculty. Journal of Higher Education, 83(3), 411–434.
47.
WeisbrodBAAschED (2010)
The truth about the “crisis” in higher education finance. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning42(1): 23–29.
48.
WilsonR (2010) Tenure, RIP: What the vanishing status means for the future of education. Available at: www.chronicle.com/article/Tenure-RIP/66114 (accessed 27 December 2017).
49.
YükselPYildirimS (2015)
Theoretical frameworks, methods, and procedures for conducting phenomenological studies in educational settings. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry6(1): 1–20.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
