The author argues that educational research curriculum that repeats formalized, scientized, pre-existing, methods-driven social science research methodologies stifle the present and future of educational research. Because such methodologies are too often disconnected from their onto-epistemological commitments, she argues for a reconnection with forms of inquiry offered by the humanities in an attempt to revitalize inquiry.
BraidottiR (2013) The Posthuman, Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity Press.
2.
Bryant LR (2008) Difference and givenness: Deleuze's transcendental empiricism and the ontology of immanence. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
3.
ButlerJ (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
ClarkeMRandJGulsonKN (2016) Introduction to the new editors. Research in Education95(1): 61–63.
5.
CloughPT (2009) The new empiricism: Affect and sociological method. European Journal of Social Theory12: 43–61.
6.
Coole D and Frost S (eds) (2010) New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
7.
Deleuze G (1994) Difference and Repetition. (P. Patton, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press (Original work published 1968).
8.
Deleuze G (1995) Negotiations: 1972–1990. (M. Joughin, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press (Original work published 1990).
9.
Deleuze G and Guattari F (1987) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (Original work published 1980).
10.
DerridaJ (1988) Letter to a Japanese friend. In: WoodDBernasconiR (eds) Derrida and différance, Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press, pp. 1–5.
11.
Foucault M (1978) The History of Sexuality Volume 1: An Introduction. (Robert Hurley, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage Books (Original work published 1976).
12.
LawJ (2004) After Method: Mess in Social Science Research, London, England: Routledge.
13.
National Research Council (2002) Scientific research in education. In: ShavelsonRJTowneL (eds) Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
14.
Spivak GC (1989) In a word: Interview. (E. Rooney, Interviewer). Differences 1: 124–156.
15.
Stewart K (2015, October). Plenary #3. Paper presented at the Affect Theory Conference. Lancaster, PA.
16.
St.PierreEA (2011) Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) Sage Handbook of Qualitative Inquiry, 4th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, pp. 611–635.
17.
St.PierreEA (2013) The posts continue: Becoming. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education26: 646–657.
18.
WhiteheadAN (1967) Science and the Modern World [Lowell Lectures, 1925], New York, NY: The Free Press.
