Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2016-7
Positive Person–Environment Factors as Mediators of the Relationship Between Perceived Burden and Quality of Life of Caregivers for Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injuries
The purpose of this study was to determine whether personal (caregiving mastery and problem-solving coping) and environmental (social support and professional and community support) caregiver resources mediate the relationship between caregiver perceived burden and quality of life (QOL). The sample consisted of 108 caregivers recruited from support groups who were predominantly White women. The majority of care-recipients had a severe head injury. Measures administered were the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List, the COPE, Family Needs Questionnaire, Modified Caregiving Appraisal Scale, and the World Health Organization Quality of Life–Brief Version. Results showed that social, professional, and community supports mediate the link between perceived burden and QOL. Caregivers of persons with traumatic brain injury frequently face elevated levels of burden, stress, and depression. Positive personal and environmental support, particularly social support, professional/community supports, and mastery, could lessen the negative impact of caregiving burden on QOL of the caregiver.
AllenK.LinnR. T.GutierrezH.WillerB. S. (1994). Family burden following traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 39, 29–48.
2.
AneshenselC. S.PearlinL. I.MullanJ. T.ZaritS. H.WhitlatchC. J. (1995). Profiles in caregiving: The unexpected career. New York, NY: Academic Press.
3.
Arango-LasprillaJ. C.QuijanoM. C.AponteM.CuervoM. T.NichollsE.RogersH. L.KreutzerJ. (2010). Family needs in caregivers of individuals with traumatic brain injury from Colombia, South America. Brain Injury, 24, 1017–1026.
4.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
5.
BeachS. R.SchulzR.YeeJ. L.JacksonS. (2000). Negative and positive health effects of caring for a disabled spouse: Longitudinal findings from the caregiver health effects study. Psychology and Aging, 15, 259–271.
6.
BergmanM. M. (2002). The benefits of a cognitive orthotic in brain injury rehabilitation. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 17, 431–445.
7.
BishopM.DegeneffeC. E.MastM. (2006). Family needs after traumatic brain injury: Implications for rehabilitation counseling. Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counseling, 12, 73–87.
8.
BrisetteI.ScheierM. F.CarverC. S. (2002). The role of optimism in social network development, coping, and psychological adjustment during a life transition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 102–111.
9.
BrooksN.CampsieL.SymingtonC.BeattieA.McKinlayW. (1987). The effects of severe head injury on patient and relative within seven years of injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 2, 1–13.
10.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F.WeintraubJ. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267–283.
11.
ChanF.TarvydasV.BlalockK.StrauserD.AtkinsB. (2009). Unifying and elevating rehabilitation counseling through model-driven, culturally-sensitive evidence-based practice. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 52, 114–119.
12.
ChronisterJ. A.ChanF. (2006). A stress process model of caregiving for individuals with traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 51, 190–201.
13.
ChronisterJ. A.ChanF.Sasson-GelmanE. J.ChuiC. Y. (2010). The association of stress-coping variables to quality of life among caregivers of individuals with traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation, 27, 49–62.
14.
ChwaliszK. (1996). The perceived stress model of caregiver burden: Evidence from spouses of persons with brain injuries. Rehabilitation Psychology, 41, 91–114.
15.
CohenC. A.ColantonioA.VernichL. (2002). Positive aspects of caregiving: Rounding out the caregiver experience. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17, 184–188.
16.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
CohenJ. (1992). Quantitative methods in psychology: A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
18.
CohenS. (2001). Social relationships and susceptibility to the common cold. In RyffC. D.SingerB. H. (Eds.), Emotion, social relationships, and health (pp. 221–242). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
19.
CohenS.DoyleW. J.TurnerR. B.AplerC. M.SkonerD. P. (2003). Emotional style and susceptibility to the common cold. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65, 652–657.
20.
CohenS.HobermanH. M. (1983). Positive events and social supports as buffers of life change stress. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 99–125.
21.
CohenS.MermelsteinR.KamarckT.HobermanH. M. (1983). Measuring the functional components of social support. In SarasonI. G.SarasonB. R. (Eds.), Social support: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 73–94). Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff.
22.
CohenS.WillsT. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357.
23.
CorriganJ. D.SelassieA. W.OrmanJ. A. (2010). The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 25, 72–80.
24.
DegeneffeC. E.ChanF.DunlapL.ManD.SungC. (2011). Development and validation of the Caregiver Empowerment Scale: A resource for working with family caregivers of persons with traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 56, 243–250.
25.
DegeneffeC. E.LeeG. K. (2015). Brain injury and the family: A guide for rehabilitation counselors. In MillingtonM.MariniI. (Eds.), Families in rehabilitation counseling: A community-based rehabilitation approach (pp. 153–170). New York, NY: Springer.
26.
DewD. W.PhillipsB.ReissD. (1989). Assessment and early planning with the family in vocational rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation, 55, 41–44.
27.
DouglasJ. M.SpellacyF. J. (2000). Correlates of depression in adults with severe traumatic brain injury and their carers. Brain Injury, 14, 71–88.
28.
ErghT. C.HanksR. A.RapportL. J.ColemanR. D. (2003). Social support moderates caregiver life satisfaction following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25, 1090–1101.
29.
ErghT. C.RapportL. J.ColemanR. D.HanksR. A. (2002). Predictors of caregiver and family functioning following traumatic brain injury: Social support moderates caregiver distress. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 17, 155–174.
30.
EvansJ. P. (2011). Resilience, ecology and adaptation in the experimental city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36, 223–237.
31.
FeldmanP. J.CohenS.HamrickN.LeporeS. J. (2004). Psychological stress, appraisal, emotion and cardiovascular response in a public speaking task. Psychology & Health, 19, 353–368.
32.
FlemingJ. M.StrongJ.AshtonR. (1998). Cluster analysis of self-awareness levels in adults with traumatic brain injury and relationship to outcome. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 13(5), 39–51.
33.
FlorianV.KatzS.LahavV. (1989). Impact of traumatic brain damage on family dynamics and functioning: A review. Brain Injury, 3, 219–233.
34.
GordonW. A.O’NeillD.VandergootD. (2003, March). Vocational rehabilitation outcomes of individuals with traumatic brain injuries. Paper presented at the Rehabilitation Services Administration Working Group on Vocational Rehabilitation and Traumatic Brain Injury, Washington, DC.
35.
HanksR. A.RapportL. J.VangelS. (2007). Caregiving appraisal after traumatic brain injury: The effects of functional status, coping style, social support and family functioning. NeuroRehabilitation, 22, 43–52.
36.
HarrisJ. M.WiseT. M.GallagherK. P.GoodwinN. R. (2001). A survey of sustainable development: Social and economic dimensions. Environmental Management and Health, 12, 529–531.
37.
HaywardB.Schmidt-DavisH. (2002, April). Vocational rehabilitation services and outcomes of individuals with traumatic brain injury: Findings from a longitudinal study of the VR service program. Paper presented at the State-of-the-Science Conference: Community Integration of Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury, Washington, DC.
38.
HilgemanM. M.AllenR. S.DeCosterJ.BurgioL. D. (2007). Positive aspects of caregiving as a moderator of treatment outcome over 12 months. Psychology and Aging, 22, 361–371.
39.
KreutzerJ. S.SerioC. D.BergquistS. (1994). Family needs after brain injury: A quantitative analysis. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 9, 104–115.
MacKinnonD. P.LockwoodC. M.HoffmanJ. M.WestS. G.SheetsV. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104.
42.
MakiD. R. (2012). Concepts and paradigms in rehabilitation counseling. In MakiD. R.TarvydasV. M. (Eds.), The professional practice of rehabilitation counseling (pp. 83–107). New York, NY: Springer.
43.
ManD. W. K. (1998). The empowering of Hong Kong Chinese families with a brain damaged member: Its investigation and measurement. Brian Injury, 12, 245–254.
MoulesS.ChandlerB. (1999). A study of the health and social needs of carers of traumatically brain injured individuals served by one community rehabilitation team. Brain Injury, 13, 983–993.
46.
NaborsN.SeacatJ.RosenthalM. (2002). Predictors of caregiver burden following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 16, 1039–1050.
47.
OddyM.HumphreyM.UttleyD. (1978). Subjective impairment and social recovery after closed head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 41, 611–616.
48.
ParveenS.MorrisonV.RobinsonC. A. (2011). Ethnic variations in the caregiver role: A qualitative study. Journal of Health Psychology, 16, 862–872.
49.
PattersonJ.BruyereS. M.SzymanskiE.JenkinsW. (2011). Philosophical, historical, and legislative aspects of the rehabilitation counseling profession. In ParkerR. M.PattersonJ. B. (Eds.), Rehabilitation counseling: Basics and beyond (5th ed., pp. 27–53). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
50.
PerleszA.KinsellaG.CroweS. (1999). Impact of traumatic brain injury on the family: A critical review. Rehabilitation Psychology, 44, 6–35.
51.
PetersL. C.StambrookM.MooreA. D.EssesL. (1990). Psychosocial sequelae of closed head injury: Effects on the marital relationship. Brain Injury, 4, 39–47.
52.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731.
53.
PrigatanoG. P.AltmanI. M.O’brienK. P. (1990). Behavioral limitations that traumatic-brain-injured patients tend to underestimate. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 4, 163–176.
54.
PrigatanoG. P.FordyceD. J.ZeinerH. K.RouecheJ. R.PeppingM.Case WoodB. (1986). Neuropsychological rehabilitation after brain injury. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
55.
RappS. R.ChaoD. (2000). Appraisals of strain and of gain: Effects on psychological wellbeing of caregivers of dementia patients. Aging & Mental Health, 4, 142–147.
56.
ReinhardS. C.GivenB.PetlickN. H.BemisA. (2008). Supporting family caregivers in providing care. In HughesR. G. (Ed.), Patient safety and quality: An evidence-based handbook for nurses (pp. 341–404). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
57.
RiveraP. A.ElliottT. R.BerryJ. W.GrantJ. S. (2008). Problem-solving training for family caregivers of persons with traumatic brain injuries: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 931–941.
58.
RiveraP. A.ElliottT. R.BerryJ. W.GrantJ. S.OswaldK. (2007). Predictors of caregiver depression among community-residing families living with traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation, 22, 3–8.
59.
RodakowskiJ.SkidmoreE. R.RogersJ. C.SchulzR. (2012). Role of social support in predicting caregiver burden. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93, 2229–2936.
60.
SandhaugM.AndelicN.BerntsenS. A.SeilerS.MyglandA. (2012). Self and near relative ratings of functional level one year after traumatic brain injury. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34, 904–909.
61.
SerioC. D.KreutzerJ. S.WitolA. D. (1997). Family needs after traumatic brain injury: A factor analytic study of the Family Needs Questionnaire. Brain Injury, 11, 1–9.
62.
ShroutP. E.BolgerN. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445.
63.
StruchenM. A.AtchisonT. B.RoebuckT. M.CaroselliJ. S.SanderA. M. (2002). A multidimensional measure of caregiving appraisal: Validation of the Caregiver Appraisal Scale in traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 17, 132–154.
64.
ThoitsP. A. (1987). Gender and marital status differences in control and distress: Common stress versus unique stress explanations. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 28, 7–22.
65.
WadeS. L.BorawskiE. A.TaylorH. G.DrotarD.YeatesK. O.StancinT. (2001). The relationship of caregiver coping to family outcomes during the initial year following pediatric traumatic injury. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 406–415.
66.
WellsR.DywanJ.DumasJ. (2005). Life satisfaction and distress in family caregivers as related to specific behavioural changes after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 19, 1105–1115.
67.
World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
68.
World Health Organization Quality of Life Group. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28, 551–558.
69.
WortmanC. B.ConwayT. L. (1985). The role of social support in adaptation and recovery from physical illness. In CohenS.SymeS. L. (Eds.), Social support and health (pp. 281–302). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
