Consumer empowerment in rehabilitation counseling has been conceptualized as a function of informed choice and self-determination and has been linked to the concepts of self-efficacy and locus of control, among other variables. Self-understanding in relation to environmental opportunities represents an important underlying component of such empowerment-related variables. A controlled experiment investigated the effect of work interest profiling in vocational assessment on career decision self-efficacy and work locus of control as indicators of empowered status. Statistical analysis (a) confirmed the absence of significant gains in empowerment-related variables with participants receiving traditional vocational assessment activities and (b) identified significant effects related to career decision self-efficacy for those receiving proactive assessment designed to promote self-understanding in relation to environmental opportunities (i.e., contextual self-understanding). Results suggest proactive vocational assessment, designed to foster contextual self-understanding, offers utility in the promotion of empowerment-related variables in rehabilitation counseling.
Aiken, L.R. (2003). Psychological testing and assessment (11th ed.). Boston: Person Educational.
2.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Bandura, A. (1998). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
5.
Becker, L.A. (2000). Basic & applied research methods. Retrieved October 16, 2005, from http://web.uccs.edu/lbecker/Psy590/gain-score.htm
6.
Betz, N.E., & Taylor, K.M. (2001). Manual for the Career Decision Self-Efficacy Scale and CDMSE-Short Form. Columbus, OH: Nancy E. Betz, Ph.D.
7.
Bolton, B., & Brookings, J. (1996). Development of a multifaceted definition of empowerment . Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 39, 1—7.
8.
Breeding, R. (2005). Rehabilitation counseling and sudden onset disability: Advancing proprietary consumer participation through improved vocational assessment . Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 22(3), 131—141.
9.
Conte, L. (1983). Vocational development theories and the disabled person: Oversight or deliberate omission. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 26, 316—328.
10.
Curnow, T.C. (1989). Vocational development of persons with disability . Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 37, 269—278.
11.
Emener, W. (1991). Empowerment in rehabilitation: An empowerment philosophy for rehabilitation in the 20th century. Journal of Rehabilitation, 57, 7—12.
12.
Farley, R.C., Bolton, B., & Taylor, J.K. (1993). The effects on vocational development of a strategy for empowering and involving consumers in the vocational evaluation process . Vocational Evaluation and Work Adjustment Bulletin, 26, 97—100.
13.
Goldberg, L. (1992). Qualitative assessment: An approach for counselors . Journal of Counseling & Development, 70, 1—10.
14.
Hershenson, D.B. (1981). Work adjustment, disability, and the three R's of vocational rehabilitation: A conceptual model. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 25, 91—97.
Holland, J.L., Powell, A.B., & Fritzsche, B.A. (1994). The Self-Directed Search (SDS) professional user's guide. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
17.
Hopkins, W.G. (1997). Repeated measures models. Retrieved November 9, 2004, from http://www.sportsci.org/resource/stats/twotrials.html
18.
Houser, R., Hampton, N.Z., and Carriker, C. (2000). Implementing the empowerment concept in rehabilitation: Contributions of social role theory. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 31, 18—23.
19.
Kosciulek, J.F., & Wheaton, J.E. (2003). Rehabilitation counseling with individuals with disabilities: An empowerment framework. Rehabilitation Education , 17, 207—214.
MacDonald, A.P. (1971). Internal-external locus of control: A promising rehabilitation variable. Journal of Counseling Psychology , 18, 111—116.
22.
Niles, S.G., Anderson, W.P., & Cover, S. (2000). Comparing intake concerns and goals with career counseling concerns. Career Development Quarterly, 49, 135—145.
23.
Osipow, S.H., Carney, C.G., & Barak, A. (1976). A scale of educational and vocational undecidedness: A typological approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 9, 233—243.
24.
Ozer, E.M., & Bandura, A. (1990). Mechanisms governing empowerment effects: A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 472—486.
25.
Power, P.W. (2000). A guide to vocational assessment (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
26.
Power, P.W., & McKenna, M. (1994). Rehabilitation counseling: A perspective on an interdisciplinary approach to vocational evaluation and assessment. Vocational Evaluation and Work Adjustment Bulletin, 27, 28—32.
27.
Prachyl, P. (1998). Consumer self-estimates vocational aptitudes and interests. Vocational Evaluation and Work Adjustment Journal , 31, 44—49.
28.
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. (amended 1998).
29.
Remer, P., & O'Neill, C. (1980). Clients as change agents: What color could my parachute be? Personnel and Guidance Journal, 58, 425—429.
30.
Rotter, J.B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1—27.
31.
Sankoh, A., Hugue, M., & Dubey, S. (2006). Simple interactive statistical analysis: Bonferroni . Downloaded August 31, 2006, from http://home.clara.net/sisa/bonhlp.htm
32.
Skinner, A.L. (2003). Using locus of control to improve self-determination and outcomes for consumers with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 34, 27—32.
33.
Spector, P.E. (1988). Development of the work locus of control scale . Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 335—340.
34.
Strauser, D.R., & Ketz, K. (2002). The relationship between self-efficacy, locus of control, and work personality. Journal of Rehabilitation , 68, 20—26.
35.
Szymanski, E.M., & Hershenson, D.B. (1998). Career development of people with disabilities: An ecological model. In R. Parker & E. Szymanski (Eds.), Rehabilitation counseling: Basics and beyond (pp. 327—378). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
36.
Syzmanski, E.M., Hershenson, D.B., Enright, M.S., & Ettinger, J.M. (1996). Career development theories, constructs, and research: Implications for people with disabilities. In E. Szymanski & R. Parker (Eds.), Work and disability: Issues and strategies in career development and job placement (pp. 79—126). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
37.
Taylor, K.M., & Betz, N.E. (1983). Applications of self-efficacy theory to the understanding and treatment of career indecision. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 22, 63—81.
38.
Uffelman, R., Mezydlo, L., Diegelman, N., Wagner, K., & Bardash, R. (2004). Effect of mode of interest assessment on client's career decision-making self-efficacy. Journal of Career Assessment , 14, 366—380.
39.
Weinrach, S.G., & Srebalus, D.J. (1990). Holland's theory of career . In D. Brown, L. Brooks, & Associates, Career choice and development: Applying contemporary theories to practice (2nd ed., pp. 37—67). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
