This article examines the effect of frequency and type of Internet use on perceived social support and sense of well-being in persons with spinal cord injury. The results show that Internet use is not significantly related to perceived social support. Bivariate analysis indicates that there is a significant negative association between total Internet use and overall sense of well-being. Simultaneous regression further investigated the nature of this relationship by examining the contribution of 10 online activities to four scales measuring sense of well-being. Frequency of online gaming was negatively associated with each scale. Disability-related information seeking was also negatively associated with psychological and financial well-being, as well as perceived social support. These results suggest that Internet use as a whole should not be overlooked by rehabilitation counselors for its practical uses to increase independence and social connectedness in persons with disabilities; however, care should be used, particularly with online gaming.
Barrera, M.J., Glasgow, R.E., McKay, H.G., Boles, S.M., & Feil, E.G. (2002). Do Internet-based support interventions change perceptions of social support? An experimental trial of approaches for supporting diabetes self-management. American Journal of Community Psychology , 30, 637-654.
2.
Chan, F., Pruett, S., Miller, S.M., Frain, M., & Blalock, K. (2006). Internet utilization by people with disabilities: Applications and research directions. In K. Hagglund & A. Heinemann (Eds.), Handbook of applied disability and rehabilitation research (pp. 263-278). New York: Springer.
3.
Chapin, M., Miller, S.M., Ferrin, J.M., Chan, F., & Rubin, S.E. (2004). Psychometric validation of a subjective well-being measure for people with spinal cord injuries. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26, 1135-1142.
4.
Cody, M.J., Dunn, D., Hoppin, S., & Wendt, P. (1999). Silver surfers: Training and evaluating Internet use among older adult learners. Communication Education, 48, 269-286.
5.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S.G., & Aiken, L.S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlational analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: HarperCollins.
7.
Darlington, R.B. (1990). Regression and linear models. New York: McGraw-Hill.
8.
Davison, K.P., Pennebaker, J.W., & Dickerson, S.S. (2000). The social psychology of illness support group. American Psychologist, 55, 205-217.
9.
Dobransky, K., & Hargittai, E. (2006). The disability divide in Internet access and use . Information, Communication & Society, 9, 313-334.
10.
Drainoni, M., Houlihan, B., Williams, S., Vedrani, M., Esch, D., Lee-Hood, E., et al. (2004). Patterns of Internet use by persons with spinal cord injuries and relationship to health-related quality of life. Archives Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 1872-1879.
11.
Fogel, J., Albert, S.M., Schnabel, F., Ditkoff, B.A., & Neugut, A.I. (2002). Internet use and social support in women with breast cancer. Health Psychology, 21, 398-404.
12.
Griffiths, M.D., Davies, M.N.O., & Chappell, D. (2004). Demographic factors and playing variables in online computer gaming. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 479-487.
13.
Gross, E.F., Juvonen, J., & Gable, S.L. (2002). Internet use and well-being in adolescence. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 75-90.
14.
Gustafson, D.H., Hawkins, R., Boberg, E., Pingree, S., Serlin, R.E., Graziano, F., et al. (1999). Impact of a patient-centered, computer-based health information/support system. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 16, 1-9.
15.
Herrero, J., & Meneses, J. (2006). Short Web-based versions of the Perceived Stress (PSS) and Center For Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CESD) scales: A comparison to pencil and paper responses among Internet users. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 830-846.
16.
Hlebec, V., Manfreda, K.L., & Vehovar, V. (2006). The social support networks of Internet users . New Media & Society, 8, 9-32.
17.
Houlihan, B.V., Drainoni, M., Warner, G., Nesathurai, S., Wierbicky, J., & Williams, S. (2003). The impact of Internet access for people with spinal cord injuries: A descriptive analysis of a pilot study. Disability and Rehabilitation: An International Multidisciplinary Journal , 25, 422-431.
18.
Kalichman, S.C., Benotsch, E.G., Weinhardt, L., Austin, J., Luke, W., & Cherry, C. (2003). Health-related Internet use, coping, social support, and health indicators in people living with HIV/AIDS: Preliminary results from a community survey. Health Psychology, 22, 111-116.
19.
Kalichman, S.C., Cain, D., Cherry, C., Pope, H., Eaton, L., & Kalichman, M.O. (2005). Internet use among people living with HIV/AIDS: Coping and health-related correlates. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 19, 439-448.
20.
Kalichman, S.C., Weinhardt, L., Benotsch, E., DiFonzo, K., Luke, W., & Austin, J. (2002). Internet access and Internet use for health information among people living with HIV-AIDS. Patient Education and Counseling , 46, 109-116.
21.
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J.N., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A.M. (2002). Internet paradox revisited . Journal of Social Issues, 58, 49-74.
22.
Kraut, R., Mukhopadhyay, T., Szczypula, J., Kiesler, S., & Scherlis, B. (1999). Information and communication: Alternative uses of the Internet in households. Information Systems Research , 10, 287-303.
23.
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kessler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53, 65-77.
24.
Kubey, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Television and the quality of life: How viewing shapes everyday experience. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
LaRose, R., Eastin, M.S., & Gregg, J. (2001). Reformulating the Internet paradox: Social cognitive explanations of Internet use and depression. Journal of Online Behavior, 1(2). Retrieved April 25, 2007, from http://www.behavior.net.proxy.lib.fsu.edu/JOB/v1n1/paradox.html
26.
LaRose, R., Mastro, D., & Eastin, M.S. (2001). Understanding Internet usage: A social-cognitive approach to uses and gratifications. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 395-413.
27.
Madara, E.J. (1997). The mutual-aid self-help online revolution. Social Policy, 27, 20-26.
28.
McKay, H.G., Glasgow, R.E., Feil, E., Boles, S.M., & Barrera, M. (2002). Internet-based diabetes self-management and support: Initial outcomes from the Diabetes Network Project. Rehabilitation Psychology, 47, 31-48.
29.
McKenna, K.Y.A., & Bargh, J.A. (1998). Coming out in the age of the Internet: Identity "demarginalization" through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 681-694.
30.
McKenna, K.Y.A., & Bargh, J.A. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 57-75.
31.
McKenna, K.Y.A., Green, A.S., & Gleason, M.E.J. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: Whats the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58, 9-31.
32.
McKenna, K.Y.A., & Seidman, G. (2005). You, me, and we: Interpersonal processes in electronic groups. In Y. Amichai-Hamburger (Ed.), The social net: Human behavior in cyberspace (pp. 191-217). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
33.
Morahan-Martin, J., & Schumacher, P. (2003). Loneliness and social uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 659-671.
34.
Ng, B.D., & Wiemer-Hastings, P. (2005). Addiction to the Internet and online gaming. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8, 110-113.
35.
Nie, N., & Erbring, L. (2000). Internet and mass media: A preliminary report . IT & Society, 1, 134-141.
36.
Petry, N.M. (2006). Internet gambling: An emerging concern in family practice medicine? Family practice, 23, 421-426.
37.
Query, J.L.J., & Wright, K. (2003). Assessing communication competence in an online study: Toward informing subsequent interventions among older adults with cancer, their lay caregivers, and peers. Health communication, 15, 203-218.
38.
Rodgers, S., & Chen, Q. (2005). Internet community group participation: Psychosocial benefits for women with breast cancer. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4). Retrieved April 15, 2007, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/v0110/issue4/rodgers.html
39.
Rubin, S.E., Chan, F., Bishop, M., & Miller, S.M. (2003). Psychometric validation of the Sense of Well-Being Inventory for program evaluation in rehabilitation. The Rehabilitation Professional, 11(2), 54-59.
40.
Sanders, C.E., Field, T.M., Diego, M., & Kaplan, M. (2000). The relationship of Internet use to depression and social isolation among adolescents. Adolescence, 35, 237-242.
41.
Shaw, L.H., & Gant, L.M. (2002). In defense of the Internet: The relationship between Internet communication and depression, loneliness, self-esteem, and perceived social support. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 5, 157-171.
42.
Sillence, E., & Briggs, P. (2007). Please advise: Using the Internet for health and financial advice. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 727-748.
43.
Swickert, R.J., Hittner, J.B., Harris, J.L., & Herring, J.A. (2002). Relationships among Internet use, personality, and social support. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 437-451.
44.
Taylor, H. (2000, June 7). How the Internet is improving the lives of Americans with disabilities (Harris Poll No. 30). Washington, DC: Harris Poll.
45.
Waestlund, E., Norlander, T., & Archer, T. (2001). Exploring cross-cultural differences in self-concept: A meta-analysis of the Self-Description Questionnaire 1. Cross-Cultural Research: The Journal of Comparative Social Science, 35, 280-302.
46.
Weinert, C. (2003). Measuring social support: PRQ2000. In O. Strickland & C. DiIorio (Eds.), Measurement of nursing outcomes: Vol. 3. Self-care and coping (pp. 161-172). New York: Springer.
47.
Wright, K.B. (2005). Researching Internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and Web survey services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3). Retrieved April 15, 2007, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/v0110/issue3/wright.html
