Data on people with disabilities can be used to confirm service needs and to evaluate the resulting impact of services. Disability statistics from surveys and administrative records can play a meaningful role in such efforts. In this article, the authors describe the array of available data and statistics and their potential uses in rehabilitation service planning and evaluation. They discuss the 2000 Decennial Census Long Form, the American Community Survey, the National Health Information Survey, the National Health Information Survey on Disability, the Current Population Survey Annual Demographics Survey, the Survey of Income and Program Participation, and the Health and Retirement Survey, administrative records such as the Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA) 911 and the Social Security Administration (SSA) Title 2 and Title 16 records, and matched data such as linked RSA and SSA records. They also provide examples of applications of these data sets to rehabilitation service planning and evaluation, along with recommendations for rehabilitation education, practice, and research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berry, H. (2000). The Supplemental Security Income Program and employment for young adults with disabilities: An analysis of the National Health Survey on Disability. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities , 15(3), 176—181.
2.
Bound, J., Burkhauser, R.V., & Nichols, A. (2003). Tracking the household income of SSDI and SSI applicants. Research in Labor Economics, 22, 113—159.
3.
Bowe, F. (1995). Population estimates: Birth-to-5 children with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 28(4), 461—471.
4.
Burkhauser, R.V., Butler, J.S., & Weathers, R.R. , II. (2002). How policy variables influence the timing of social security disability insurance applications . Social Security Bulletin, 64(1), 52—83.
5.
Burkhauser, R.V., Daly, M.C., & Houtenville, A.J. (2001). How working age people with disabilities fared over the 1990s business cycle. In P. Budetti, R. V. Burkhauser , J. Gregory, & H. A. Hunt (Eds.), Proceedings of the National Academy on Social Insurance conference on ensuring health and income security for an aging workforce (pp. 291— 346). Washington, DC: National Academy on Social Insurance.
6.
Burkhauser, R.V., Daly, M.C., Houtenville, A.J., & Nargis, N. (2002). Self-reported work limitation data: What they can and cannot tell us. Demography, 39(3), 541—555.
7.
Burkhauser, R.V., Houtenville, A., & Wittenburg, D. (2003). A user guide to current statistics on the employment of people with disabilities. In D. Stapleton & R. V. Burkhauser (Eds.), The decline in the employment of people with disabilities: A policy puzzle (pp. 23—86). Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research .
8.
Burkhauser, R.V., & Wittenburg, D.C. (1996). How current disability transfer policies discourage work: Analysis from the 1990 SIPP. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 7, 9—27.
9.
Council of State Administrators of Vocational Rehabilitation. (2003). Recommendation for the FY 2003 appropriation for the Public Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) Program. Retrieved November 18, 2004, from http://www.rehabnetwork.org/position_papers/vr_issues.htm
10.
DeLeire, T. (2000). The wage and employment effects of the Americans With Disabilities Act. The Journal of Human Resources, 35(4), 693— 715.
11.
Dolan, R.C., & Dean, D.J. (1986). Toward an improved methodology for estimating benefits of the Vocational Rehabilitation Program. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 30(2), 110—116.
12.
Dolan, R.C., & Dean, D.J. (1991). Fixed-effects estimates of earnings for the Vocational Rehabilitation Program. The Journal of Human Resources, 26(2), 380—391.
13.
Gilmore, D., Schuster, J., Timmons, J., & Butterworth, J. (2000). An analysis of the trends for people with MR, cerebral palsy, and epilepsy receiving services from state VR agencies: Ten years of progress. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 44(1), 30—38.
14.
Guerrero, J., Sniezek, J., & Sehgal, M. (1999). The prevalence of disability from chronic conditions due to injury among adults ages 18—69 years. Disability and Rehabilitation: An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(4), 187—192.
15.
Hale, T.W. (2001). The lack of a disability measure in today's current population survey. Monthly Labor Review, 124(6), 38—40.
16.
Hayward, B.J., & Schmidt-Davis, H. (2003a). How consumer characteristics affect access to, receipt of, and outcomes of vocational rehabilitation services (Final report 1). Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.
17.
Hayward, B.J., & Schmidt-Davis, H. (2003b). Longitudinal study of the Vocational Rehabilitation Services Program: VR services and outcomes (Final report 2). Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.
18.
Hayward, R., & Schmidt-Davis, H. (2003c). Longitudinal study of the Vocational Rehabilitation Services Program: VR services and outcomes. Final report 2 submitted to the U.S. Department of Education Rehabilitation ServicesAdministration.
19.
Hendershot, G.E., Larson, S., & Lakin, K.C. (2003). An overview of the National Health Interview Survey on Disability. In S. Barnart, B. Altman, S. Larson, & G. E. Hendershot (Eds.), Results from the National Health Interview Survey on Disability: Research in social science and disability (pp. 9—40). London: Elsevier.
20.
Kaye, H.S. (2002). Improved employment opportunities for people with disabilities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
21.
Kennedy, J., & Olney, M. (2001). Job discrimination in the post-ADA era: Estimates from the 1994 and 1995 National Health Interview Surveys. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 45, 24—31.
22.
Kosciulek, J. (2004). Research applications of the Longitudinal Study of the Vocational Rehabilitation Services Program. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 47, 173—180.
23.
Kruse, D., & Schur, L. (2003). Does the definition affect the outcome? Employment trends under alternative measures of disability. In D. C. Stapleton & R. V. Burkhauser (Eds.), The decline in employment of people with disabilities: A policy puzzle (pp. 279—300). Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
24.
LaPlante, M.P. (1992). Using the survey of income and program participation in disability research and policy. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 18(1—4), 125.
25.
Loprest, P., & Maag, E. (2003). Issues in job search and work accommodations for adults with disabilities. Research in Social Science andDisability, 3, 87—108.
26.
Maag, E., & Wittenburg, D.C. (2003). Real trends or measurement problems? Disability and employment trends from the Survey of Income and Program Participation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Rehabilitation Research and Training Center for Economic Research on Employment Policy for Persons With Disabilities.
27.
McNeil, J. (2000, June). Employment, earnings, and disability. Paper presented at the 75th annual conference of the Western Economic Association International. Retrieved November 18, 2004, from http://www.census.gov/hhes/www./disability.html
28.
McNeil, J. (2001). Americans with disabilities: Household economic studies. Current population reports. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved November 18, 2004, from http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/p70-73.pdf
29.
Moore, C. (2002a). Outcome variables that contribute to group differences between Caucasians, African-Americans, and Asian-Americans who are deaf. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 33(2), 8—12.
30.
Moore, C. (2002b). Relationship of consumer characteristics and service provision to income of successfully rehabilitated individuals who are deaf. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 45, 233—239.
31.
Moore, C., Alston, R., Donnell, C., & Hollis, B. (2003). Correlates of rehabilitation success among African-American and Caucasian SSDI recipients with mild mental retardation. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 34(3), 25—32.
32.
Olney, M., & Kennedy, J. (2001). National estimates of vocational service utilization and job placement rates for adults with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 39(1), 32—39.
33.
Paugh, C. (2003). Vocational rehabilitation for persons with dual diagnosis: Specific service patterns that enhance earnings at the time of case closure. (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 2003). Dissertation Abstracts International, 64-04B, 1680.
34.
Stapleton, D. C., & Burkhauser, R. V. (Eds.). (2003). The decline in employment of people with disabilities: A policy puzzle. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
35.
Stapleton, D.C., & Erickson, W. (2004). Characteristics or incentives: Why do employment outcomes for the SSA beneficiary clients of VR agencies differ, on average, from those of other clients?Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Rehabilitation Research and Training Center for Economic Research on Employment Policy for Persons With Disabilities.
36.
Stapleton, D.C., Goodman, N., & Houtenville, A.J. (2003). Have changes in the nature of work or the labor market reduced employment prospects of workers with disabilities? In D. C. Stapleton & R. V. Burkhauser (Eds.), The decline in employment of people with disabilities: A policy puzzle (pp. 125—179). Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
37.
Stapleton, D.C., Livermore, G.A., & Kennell, G. (2001). Options for modeling policy impacts on working-age adults and children with disabilities: Preliminary options. Washington, DC.: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
38.
Stern, S.M. (2003). Counting people with disabilities: How survey methodology influences estimates in Census 2000 and the Census 2000 Supplementary Survey. U.S. Bureau of the Census; retrieved November 18, 2004, from http://www.census.gov/acs/www./Downloads/ACS/finalstern.pdf
39.
Stern, S.M., & Brault, M. (2005). Disability data from the American Community Survey: A brief examination of the effects of a question redesign in 2003. U.S. Bureau of the Census; retrieved November 18, 2004, from www.census.gov/hhes/www./disability/ACS_disability.pdf
40.
Trupin, L., Sebesta, D.S., Yelin, E., & LaPlante, M.P. (1997). Trends in labor force participation among persons with disabilities (Disability Statistics Report 10). Washington, DC: National Institute of Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
41.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2000). Census 2000 needs requirements, March 23, 2000. Retrieved November 18, 2004, from http://www.census.gov/dmd/www./pdf/09h_di.pdf
42.
U.S. Department of Education. (2000). Policy directive RSA-PD-00-06, March 16, 2003. Retrieved November 18, 2004, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/rsa/pd-00-06.pdf
43.
Wadsworth, J., & Kampfe, C.M. (2004). The participation of senior workers in vocational rehabilitation services. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 35(1),10—15.
44.
Wheaton, J. (2002). Ancestry and severity of disability: A national study. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 45, 154—161.
45.
Whitney, T., Timmons, J., Gilmore, D., & Thomas, D. (1999). Expanding access: Changes in vocational rehabilitation practice since the 1992 Rehabilitation Act amendments. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 43, 30—40.
46.
Wilson, K. (1999). Vocational rehabilitation acceptance: A tale of two races in a large midwestern state. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 30(2), 25—31.
47.
Wilson, K. (2002). Exploration of VR acceptance and ethnicity: A national investigation. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin , 45, 168—176.
48.
Wilson, K. (2004). Vocational rehabilitation acceptance in the USA: Controlling for education, type of major disability, severity of disability and socioeconomic status. Disability and Rehabilitation: An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 26(3), 145—156.
