The purpose of this study was to identify the factors that contributed to vocational rehabilitation assessment of earning capacity. Rehabilitation professionals who attended a national forensic rehabilitation conference were asked to rate the importance of 26 variables in development of opinions of earning capacity. Exploratory factor analysis revealed four themes in the responses: intrinsic characteristics of the worker, transferable skills components, worker traits, and labor market conditions. Multivariate analysis of variance found no significant differences in mean importance of the factors among forensic rehabilitation professionals practicing in different legal forums or in retention by plaintiff, defense, or neutral status, as well as no significant interactions. The results of this study will assist in the establishment of a standardized methodology for developing opinions of earning capacity consistent between forums of practice and competing parties in adjudication of vocational disability claims.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bakkenson, G. (2004). Role and functions of the vocational expert in worker's compensation in Arizona. Journal of Forensic VocationalAnalysis, 6(2), 99—106.
2.
Bast, S., Williams, J.M., & Dunn, P.L. (2002). The classic model of transferability of skills: Issues affecting outcomes when assessing future vocational options in earnings capacity assessment. Journal of Forensic VocationalAnalysis , 5(1), 15—26.
3.
Comrey, A.L., & Lee, H.B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993).
5.
Dawis, R.V. (1976). The Minnesota theory of work adjustment. In B. Bolton (Ed.), Handbook of measurement and evaluation in rehabilitation (pp. 203—217). Baltimore: University Park Press.
6.
Dawis, R.V., England, G.W., & Lofquist, L.H. (1964). A theory of work adjustment. Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation: Vol. 15. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Industrial Relations Center.
7.
Dawis, R.V., Lofquist, L.H., & Weiss, D.J. (1968). A theory of work adjustment: A revision. Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation, Vol. 15. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Industrial Relations Center.
8.
Dillman, E.G. (1987). Interfacing the economic and vocational in personal injury cases. Journal of Forensic Economics, 1(2), 1—12.
9.
Dillman, E. (1992). Evaluation of economic damages. El Paso, TX: International Business Planners.
10.
Dunn, P.L. (2000). Congruence of occupational classifications between work history and placement. Vocational Evaluation and Work Adjustment Journal, 32(2), 119—127.
11.
Dunn, P.L., & Growick, B.S. (2000). Transferable skills analysis in vocational rehabilitation: Historical foundations, current status, and future trends. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 14, 1—9.
12.
Employee Benefits, 20 C.F.R. § 400—499 (1996).
13.
Field, T.F. (1999). Strategies for the rehabilitation consultant: Transferability, loss of employment, loss of earning capacity, and damages . Athens, GA: Elliot & Fitzpatrick .
Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin,103, 265—275.
18.
Hershenson, D.B. (1996a). A systems reformulation of the developmental model of work adjustment. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin , 40(1), 2—10.
19.
Hershenson, D.B. (1996b). Work adjustment: A neglected area in career counseling . Journal of Counseling and Development, 74(5), 442— 446.
20.
Hershenson, D.B., & Szymanski, E.M. (1992). Career development of people with disabilities. In R. M. Parker & E. M. Szymanski (Eds.), Rehabilitation counseling: Basics and beyond (2nd ed., pp. 273—303). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
21.
Johnston, C., & Growick, B. (2004). The use of vocational experts by the Ohio Industrial Commission: Building a better employability assessment. Journal of VocationalAnalysis, 6(2), 113—125.
22.
Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999).
McCroskey, B.J., & Feldbaum, C.L. (1995). Statistical basics revisited for vocational evaluation and earning capacity analysis under Daubert: A need for forensic standards. Journal of Vocationology, 1(1), 6—8.
25.
McCroskey, B.J., & Hahn, S.J. (1997). The Vocational Quotient (VQ) as a predictor of earning capacity. Journal of Forensic Vocationology, 3(1), 1—27.
26.
McCroskey, B.J., Streater, S.E., Wattenbarger, W.E., Feldbaum, C.L., & Dennis, K.L. (1997). Analyzing employability using worker trait factors: Past, present and future. Journal of Forensic Vocational Assessment , 1(1), 7—39.
27.
Murphy, P.A., & Williams, J.M. (1999). Assessment of rehabilitative and quality of life issues in litigation. Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press.
28.
Spitznagel, R.J., & Cody, L.S. (2004). The role and functions of the vocational experts in workers' compensation in Florida. Journal of Forensic VocationalAnalysis, 6(2), 127—134.
29.
Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC : American Psychological Association.
30.
Toppino, D.C. (1998). Vocational economic methods, parameters, and underpinning in personal injury litigation: An interview with Everett G. Dillman. Journal of Forensic Vocational Assessment, 1(2), 5—18.
31.
U.S. Department of Labor. (1991a). Dictionary of occupational titles (4th ed., rev.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
32.
U.S. Department of Labor. (1991b). Revised handbook for analyzing jobs. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
33.
Van de Bitter, E.F. (2004). Evaluating workers' compensation claims for permanent and total disability in California: A vocational rehabilitation methodology . Journal of Forensic Vocational Analysis, 6(2), 89— 98.
Williams, J.M. (1998). Transferability of skills methodologies used in computerized job matching systems: Sufficient or insufficient control of methodologically induced error variance. Journal of Forensic Vocational Assessment , 1(3), 29—41.
36.
Williams, J.M. (2003). The role of the vocational rehabilitationist. In S. L. Demeter & G. B. J. Andersson (Eds.), Disability evaluation (2nd ed., pp. 644—646). Chicago: American Medical Association.
37.
Williams, J.M., & Dorto, A.J. (2002). Determination of loss of quality of life. In Michel Lacerte (Ed.), Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America. Philadelphia: Harcourt.
38.
Williams, J.M., & Maze, M. (1994). The role of the rehabilitation expert in civil and administrative law proceedings. Iowa City, IA: ACT.
39.
Williams, J.M., & Reavy, G. (1993). Use of rehabilitation and economic experts in personal injury litigation: An integrated approach. In D. Stein (Ed.), Vocational Expert Monograph Series (pp. 16—87). Topeka, KS: American Board of Vocational Experts.
40.
Williams, J.M., Sawyer, H., & LaBuda, J. (1993). Forensic rehabilitation . In R. Thorson (Ed.), CIRS self-study guide (pp. 69—88). Rolling Meadows, IL: Certified Insurance Rehabilitation Specialist Commission.
