Analytical Assessments of Foreign Students' Writing

Abstract

This study investigated the assessment of foreign students' writing by native speaker ESL teachers. The assessment used an analytical scoring technique based on the ESL Composition Profile which contains the following features : Content, Organization, Vocabulary, Language Use, and Mechanics. 210 writing samples were used and evaluated by at least 2 raters each. A multiple regression analysis was performed to investigate how much each component contributed to the total score variance. The analysis indicated that Vocabulary accounted for the largest amount of variance in the total scores (83.75%), with Content, Language Use, Organization, and Mechanics accounting for 8.06%, 4.05%, 2.48% and .29%, respectively. The results are discussed in terms of appropriate instructional strategies for teaching ESL writing.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Applebee, A.N. (1981). Writing in the Secondary School (NCTE Research Report No. 21). Urbana IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Brown, J.D. (1988). Understanding Research in Second Language Learning . Cambridge: Cambridge University .

Brown, J.D. and Bailey, K.M. (1984). A categorical instrument for scoring second language writing skills. Language Learning, 34 (4), 21-42.

Burt, M.K. (1975). Error analysis in the adult EFL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 9 (1), 53-63.

Burt, M.K. and Kiparsky, C. (1974). Global and local mistakes. In J.H. Schumann and N. Stenson (Eds.) New Frontiers in Second Language Learning (pp. 71-79), Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.

Chastain, K. (1980). Native speaker reaction to instructor-identified student second language errors. Modern Language Journal, 64 (2), 210-215.

Delisle, H.H. (1982). Native speaker judgment and the evaluation of errors in German. Modern Language Journal, 66, 39-48.

Hatch, E. and Lazaraton, A. (1991). The Research Manual: Design and Statistics for Applied Linguistics. New York: Newbury House Publishers.

Jacobs, H.L. , Zingraf, S.A. , Wormuth, D.R. , Hartfiel, V.F. , and Hughey, J.B. (1981). Testing ESL Composition, Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.

10.

Mullen, K.A. (1977). Using rater judgements in the evaluation of writing proficiency for non-native speakers of English. In H.D. Brown , C.A. Yorio , and R.H. Crymes (Eds.) On TESOL 77 (pp.309-320). Washington, DC: TESOL.

11.

Norusis, M.J. (1988). SPSS/PC+Studentware. Chicago, IL:SPSS Inc.

12.

Piazza, L.G. (1980). French tolerance for grammatical errors made by Americans. Modern Language Journal, 64, 422-427.

13.

Robb, T. , Ross, S. , and Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience of feedback in error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly, 20 (1), 83-95.

14.

Santos, T. (1988). Professors' reactions to the academic writing of non-native speaking students. TESOL Quarterly, 22 (1), 69-90.

15.

So, S. and Pennington, M.C. (1989). Comparing writing process and product across two languages: A study of six Singaporean college student writers. Unpublished manuscript, National University of Singapore and University of Hawaii at Manoa.

16.

Tomiyana, M. (1980). Grammatical errors communication breakdown. TESOL Quarterly, 14 (1), 71-79.

17.

Zamel, V. (1983). The composing process of six advanced ESL students . TESOL Quarterly, 17 (2), 165-187.