A wide variety of studies have documented the discrimination in job hiring faced by non-native English-speaking teachers, including in both offline and online contexts. Online tutoring platforms have been recognized as one potential avenue by which non-native English-speaking teachers can bypass institutional barriers and directly engage with potential learners. On online tutoring platforms, non-native English-speaking teachers compete directly against native speakers in an open market, with a wide range of potential implications for how non-native English-speaking teachers understand their position in the market vis-à-vis native speakers. However, thus far relatively little research has discussed non-native English-speaking teachers’ position on online tutoring platforms. Focusing on a popular online teaching platform, this study draws on interviews to explore how Mainland Chinese non-native English-speaking teachers view their competitive advantages and disadvantages on online tutoring platforms. The findings indicate that the teachers tend to see themselves as possessing unique advantages that allow them to successfully compete against native speakers. At the same time, many teachers view native speakers as inherently more appropriate instructors of English. We conclude by discussing the implications of our findings for future research.
AlqahtaniMH (2024) ‘Would you take a pay cut? We’re looking for Caucasians’: How whiteness can affect White, Black and Muslim female ‘native-speaker’ English language teachers. Heliyon10(9): Article e29887.
2.
AlshammariA (2021) Job advertisements for English teachers in the Saudi Arabian context: Discourses of discrimination and inequity. TESOL Journal12(2): e542.
3.
AnejaGA (2016) (Non)native speakered: Rethinking (non)nativeness and teacher identity in TESOL teacher education. TESOL Quarterly50(3): 572–596.
4.
Aslan E and Ho WYJ (2025) Projecting authenticity through nativeness: A multimodal analysis of microcelebrity English teachers' Instagram reels. Applied Linguistics Review. DOI: 10.1515/applirev-2025-0220
5.
BoonsukYWasohFEFangF (2023) Native and non-native identity preferences in ELT hiring practices amid Global Englishes: The case of online job advertisements. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review23(1): 11.
6.
BraineG (ed.) (1999) Non-Native Educators in English Language Teaching. New York: Routledge.
7.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
8.
BraunVClarkeV (2021) One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?Qualitative Research in Psychology18(3): 328–352.
9.
CanagarajahAS (1999) Interrogating the ‘native speaker fallacy’: Non-linguistic roots, non-pedagogical results. In: BraineG (ed.) Non-Native Educators in English Language Teaching. New York: Routledge, 77–92.
10.
ChoEJangIC (2025) ‘He did not mean to do it to me’: Online sexual harassment and the feminization of Filipina English teachers on an ELT platform. Applied Linguistics Review. DOI: 10.1515/applirev-2025-0222
11.
ChoiLJ (2016) Revisiting the issue of native speakerism: ‘I don’t want to speak like a native speaker of English’. Language and Education30(1): 72–85.
12.
ClarkEParanA (2007) The employability of non-native-speaker teachers of EFL: A UK survey. System35(4): 407–430.
13.
ColmeneroKLasagabasterD (2024) Enclosing native speakerism: students’, parents’ and teachers’ perceptions of language teachers. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development45(2): 85–100.
14.
ConsoliSGanassinS (2023) Reflexivity in Applied Linguistics: Opportunities, Challenges, and Suggestions. New York: Routledge.
15.
CookV (1999) Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly33(2): 185–209.
16.
CurranNM (2020) Intersectional English(es) and the gig economy: Teaching English online. International Journal of Communication14: 20.
17.
CurranNM (2023a) Discrimination in the gig economy: The experiences of Black online English teachers. Language and Education37(2): 171–185.
18.
CurranNM (2023b) Banal nationalism and conversational cosmopolitanism: The potential of online language education for intercultural communication. Language and Intercultural Communication23(3): 333–346.
19.
CurranNMJenksC (2023) Gig economy teaching: On the importance and dangers of self-branding in online markets. Applied Linguistics44(3): 442–461.
20.
CurranNMZhenLGalperinH (2023) Pop cosmopolitanism and online languge learning: Findings from a discrete choice experiment. Information, Communication & Society26(1): 104–122.
21.
DaoudSKasztalskaA (2025) Exploring native-speakerism in teacher job recruitment discourse through Legitimation Code Theory: The case of the United Arab Emirates. Language Teaching Research29(2): 786–806.
22.
DaviesA (2006) The native speaker in applied linguistics. In: DaviesAElderC (eds) The Handbook of Applied Linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 431–450.
23.
DewaeleJM (2018) Why the dichotomy ‘L1 versus LX user’ is better than ‘native versus non-native speaker’. Applied Linguistics39(2): 236–240.
24.
DomingoEV (2024) Introducing private online language education: Out-of-the-shadows, technology-powered foreign language teaching. TESOL Journal15(1): Article e731. DOI: 10.1002/tesj.731
25.
GallowayN (2024) What’s in a name? Global Englishes—an umbrella term to address silo mentality or a misunderstood paradigm reinforcing silos?TESOL Quarterly59(1): 24–48.
26.
GuestGBunceAJohnsonL (2006) How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods18(1): 59–82.
27.
HashimotoNRakhshandehrooM (2023) Native-speakerism in higher education through the eyes of non-Japanese NNESTs. JALT Postconference Publication – Issue 2022.1; August 2023: 37–43.
28.
HeX (2021) The preservation of native-speakerist ideology. 研究年報 (Annual Research Report)62: 63–90.
29.
HollidayA (2005) The Struggle to Teach English as an International Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ImperialRA (2025) Rethinking global Englishes and moving toward reparative redress for language-minoritized and racialized TESOL practitioners. TESOL Quarterly59(1): 310–332.
32.
JenksC (2019) English for sale: Using race to create value in the Korean ELT market. Applied Linguistics Review10(4): 517–538.
33.
JenksCJ (2017) Race and Ethnicity in English Language Teaching: Korea in Focus (Vol. 22). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
34.
KiczkowiakM (2020) Recruiters’ attitudes to hiring ‘native’ and ‘non-native speaker’ teachers: An international survey. TESL-EJ24(1): n1.
35.
KimE (2012) Human capital: Transnational Korean adoptees and the neoliberal logic of return. Journal of Korean Studies17(2): 299–327.
36.
KobayashiY (2023) Japanese English learners’ perceptions of Filipino teachers’ online English lessons: Implications for Global Englishes research. RELC Journal54(3): 574–587.
37.
KudaibergenovM (2025) Becoming an EFL teacher abroad: The identity work of international pre-service teachers in Korea. Asian Englishes27(2): 441–460.
38.
LasagabasterDSierraJM (2002) University students’ perceptions of native and non-native speaker teachers of English. Language Awareness11(2): 132–142.
39.
LeonardJ (2019) Beyond ‘(non) native-speakerism’: Being or becoming a native-speaker teacher of English. Applied Linguistics Review10(4): 677–703.
40.
LeungAHCYipT (2020) Reality check: Identity struggle and experiences of NESTs living and teaching abroad. In: YazanBLindahlK (eds) Language Teacher Identity in TESOL. London: Routledge, 161–178.
41.
LevisJMSonsaatSLinkS, et al. (2016) Native and nonnative teachers of L2 pronunciation: Effects on learner performance. TESOL Quarterly50(4): 894–931.
42.
LitmanR (2022) ‘Neutral’ vs. ‘pure’ accents: The racialization of Filipino and EuroAmerican teachers in China’s online education industry during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Anthropology21(3): 224–237.
43.
LlurdaE (2009) The decline and fall of the native speaker. In: CookVWeiL (eds) Language Teaching and Learning. London: Continuum, 37–53.
44.
LoweRJ (2020) Uncovering Ideology in English Language Teaching: Identifying the ‘Native Speaker’ Frame. English Language Education (Vol. 19). Springer.
45.
LoweRJPinnerR (2016) Finding the connections between native-speakerism and authenticity. Applied Linguistics Review7(1): 27–52.
46.
MaFLP (2012) Advantages and disadvantages of native-and nonnative-English-speaking teachers: student perceptions in Hong Kong. TESOL Quarterly46(2): 280–305.
47.
MackenzieL (2021) Discriminatory job advertisements for English language teachers in Colombia: An analysis of recruitment biases. TESOL Journal12(1): e00535.
48.
MaganakaA (2023) Native speakerism and employment discrimination in English language teaching. Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education/Revue Canadienne des Jeunes Chercheures et Chercheurs en éducation14(1): 119–130.
49.
MahboobAGoldenR (2013) Looking for native speakers of English: Discrimination in English language teaching job advertisements. Voices in Asia Journal1(1): 72–81.
50.
MartinezJC (2022) A ‘new’ hierarchy of English teachers: The ‘half-native’ English teacher as a neoliberal, racialized and gendered subject. Asian Englishes24(1): 32–49.
51.
MorikawaTParbaJ (2023) (Il)Legitimating Filipino teachers’ English on webpages for Japanese learners of English. TESOL Quarterly57(4): 1197–1225.
52.
PanaliganJHCurranNM (2022) “We are cheaper, so they hire us”: Discounted nativeness in online English teaching. Journal of Sociolinguistics26(2): 246–264.
53.
PennycookA (1998) English and the Discourses of Colonialism. London: Routledge.
54.
PinnerRS (2014) The authenticity continuum: Empowering international voices. English Language Teacher Education and Development16(1): 9–17.
55.
RamjattanVA (2022) Racializing the problem of and solution to foreign accent in business. Applied Linguistics Review13(4): 527–544.
56.
RevesTMedgyesP (1994) The non-native English speaking EFL/ESL teacher’s self-image: An international survey. System22(3): 353–367.
57.
RudolphN (2018) Idealized nativeness, privilege, and marginalization in English language teaching. In: LiontasJI (ed.) The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. Hoboken, NJ, 1–7.
58.
RueckerTIvesL (2015) White native English speakers needed: The rhetorical construction of privilege in online teacher recruitment spaces. TESOL Quarterly49(4): 733–756.
59.
SavskiK (2021) Dialogicality and racialized discourse in TESOL recruitment. TESOL Quarterly55(3): 795–816.
60.
SelviAF (2010) All teachers are equal, but some teachers are more equal than others: Trend analysis of job advertisements in English language teaching. WATESOL NNEST Caucus Annual Review1(1): 155–181.
61.
SelviAF (2014) Myths and misconceptions about nonnative English speakers in the TESOL (NNEST) movement. TESOL Journal5(3): 573–611.
62.
SelviAFYazanBMahboobA (2024) Research on ‘native’ and ‘non-native’ English-speaking teachers: Past developments, current status, and future directions. Language Teaching57(1): 1–41.
WangLFangF (2020) Native-speakerism policy in English language teaching revisited: Chinese university teachers’ and students’ attitudes towards native and non-native English-speaking teachers. Cogent Education7(1): 1778374.
65.
ZengWCurranNM (2025) Iterative self-branding: Chinese language teachers’ understanding and rationalization of working on online tutoring platforms. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.70001
66.
ZhangE (Forthcoming) Novice non-native L2 teacher: Identity and agency. In: NazariM (ed.) Novice Non-Native English Language Teachers Navigating Agency: International Perspectives. London: Routledge.
67.
ZhenLCurranNMGalperinH (2025) Factors driving teacher selection on online language tutoring platforms: An experiment-based approach. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development46(2): 304–317.
