Although there is an ever-growing volume of research focused on TESOL textbooks (or coursebooks, as they are sometimes known), I argue that the TESOL research community should pay more attention to textbook research in mainstream education, that is, to the work of those scholars who focus on L1 rather than L2 education, given that there is a rich, methodologically sound tradition of L1 textbook research from which we can usefully learn lessons. I support this argument by describing in detail three exemplary empirical studies of textbooks from mainstream education, identifying how they can inspire and strengthen TESOL research.
AmraniF (2011) The process of evaluation: a publisher’s view. In: TomlinsonB (ed.) Materials Development in Language Teaching (2nd ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 267–95.
BallDLCohenDK (1996) Reform by the book: what is – or might be – the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform?Educational Researcher25(9): 6–8, 14.
4.
BehmSLLloydGM (2009) Factors influencing student teachers’ use of mathematics curriculum materials. In: RemillardJTHerbel-EisenmannBALloydGM (eds) Mathematics Teachers at Work: Connecting Curriculum Materials and Classroom Instruction. New York: Routledge, 205–22.
5.
BellJGowerR (2011) Writing course materials for the world: a great compromise. In: TomlinsonB (ed.) Materials Development in Language Teaching (2nd ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 135–50.
6.
BonkowskiF (1995) Teacher use and interpretation of textbook materials in the secondary ESL classroom in Quebec. Unpublished PhD thesis, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
7.
BorkoHLivingstonC (1989) Cognition and improvisation: differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal26(4): 473–98.
8.
BrownMW (2009) The teacher-tool relationship: theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials. In: RemillardJTHerbel-EisenmannBALloydGM (eds) Mathematics Teachers at Work: Connecting Curriculum Materials and Classroom Instruction. New York: Routledge, 17–36.
9.
ChvalKBChávezÓReysBJTarrJ (2009) Considerations and limitations related to conceptualizing and measuring textbook integrity. In: RemillardJTHerbel-EisenmannBALloydGM (eds) Mathematics Teachers at Work: Connecting Curriculum Materials and Classroom Instruction. New York: Routledge, 70–84.
CollopyR (2003) Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: how a mathematics textbook affected two teachers’ learning. The Elementary School Journal103(3): 287–311.
DavisEABeyerCForbesCTStevensS (2011) Understanding pedagogical design capacity through teachers’ narratives. Teaching and Teacher Education27(4): 797–810.
14.
DörnyeiZ (2007) Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
DrakeCSherinMG (2009) Developing curriculum vision and trust: changes in teachers’ curriculum strategies. In: RemillardJTHerbel-EisenmannBALloydGM (eds) Mathematics Teachers at Work: Connecting Curriculum Materials and Classroom Instruction. New York: Routledge, 321–37.
16.
DuffPA (2008) Case Study Research in Applied Linguistics. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17.
GartonSGravesK (2014a) International Perspectives on Materials in ELT. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
18.
GartonSGravesK (2014b) Materials in ELT: current issues. In: GartonSGravesK (eds) International Perspectives on Materials in ELT. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–15.
19.
GoodJRP (2003) Discovering a method for analysis and development of teacher’s guides’ contribution to lesson content. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Essex, Essex, UK.
20.
GrammatosiFHarwoodN (2014) An experienced teacher’s use of the textbook on an academic English course: a case study. In: HarwoodN (ed.) English Language Teaching Textbooks: Content, Consumption, Production. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 178–204.
21.
GrayJ (2010a) The Construction of English: Culture, Consumerism and Promotion in the ELT Global Coursebook. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
22.
GrayJ (2010b) The ELT coursebook as cultural artefact: how teachers censor and adapt. ELT Journal54(3): 274–83.
23.
GrossmanPThompsonC (2008) Learning from curriculum materials: scaffolds for new teachers?Teaching and Teacher Education24(8): 2014–26.
24.
HadfieldJ (2014) Chaosmos: spontaneity and order in the materials design process. In: HarwoodN (ed.) English Language Teaching Textbooks: Content, Consumption, Production. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 320–59.
25.
HarwoodN (2010) Issues in materials development and design. In: HarwoodN (ed.) English Language Teaching Materials: Theory & Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press, 3–30.
26.
HarwoodN (2014) Content, consumption, and production: three levels of textbook research. In: HarwoodN (ed.) English Language Teaching Textbooks: Content, Consumption, Production. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–41.
27.
HutchinsonEG (1996) What do teachers and learners actually do with textbooks? Teacher and learner use of a fisheries-based ELT textbook in the Philippines. Unpublished PhD thesis, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
28.
JohnsonK (2003) Designing Language Teaching Tasks. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
29.
LeeHParkK-C (2008) Sociocultural appropriateness in Korean middle school English textbooks. English Language and Linguistics26: 215–40.
30.
LincolnYSGubaEG (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
31.
LittlejohnA (1992) Why are English language teaching materials the way they are? Unpublished PhD thesis, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
32.
LiuYXuY (2011) Inclusion or exclusion? A narrative inquiry of a language teacher’s identity experience in the ‘new work order’ of competing pedagogies. Teaching & Teacher Education27(3): 589–97.
33.
ManouchehriAGoodmanT (1998) Mathematics curriculum reform and teachers: understanding the connections. Journal of Educational Research92(1): 27–41.
34.
MaresC (2003) Writing a coursebook. In: TomlinsonB (ed.) Developing Materials for Language Teaching. London: Continuum, 130–40.
35.
MenkabuAHarwoodN (2014) Teachers’ conceptualization and use of the textbook on a medical English course. In: HarwoodN (ed.) English Language Teaching Textbooks: Content, Consumption, Production. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 145–77.
36.
MilesMBHubermanAM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
37.
NicolCCCrespoSM (2006) Learning to teach with mathematics textbooks: how preservice teachers interpret and use curriculum materials. Educational Studies in Mathematics62(3): 331–55.
38.
RemillardJT (1999) Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: a framework for examining teachers’ curriculum development. Curriculum Inquiry29(3): 315–42.
39.
RemillardJT (2000) Can curriculum materials support teachers’ learning? Two fourth-grade teachers’ use of a new mathematics text. The Elementary School Journal100(4): 331–50.
40.
RemillardJTBryansMB (2004) Teachers’ orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: implications for teacher learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education35(5): 352–88.
41.
RichardsJC (2014) The ELT textbook. In: GartonSGravesK (eds) International Perspectives on Materials in ELT. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 19–36.
42.
ShawerSF (2010) Classroom-level curriculum development: EFL teachers as curriculum-developers, curriculum-makers and curriculum-transmitters. Teaching and Teacher Education26(2): 173–84.
43.
SheldonLE (1988) Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal42(4): 237–46.
44.
Singapore WalaDA (2003) Publishing a coursebook: completing the materials development circle. In: TomlinsonB (ed.) Developing Materials for Language Teaching. London: Continuum, 141–61.
45.
SmagorinskyPLaklyAJohnsonTS (2002) Acquiescence, accommodation, and resistance in learning to teach within a prescribed curriculum. English Education34(3): 187–213.
46.
StollerFLRobinsonMS (2014) An interdisciplinary textbook project: charting the paths taken. In: HarwoodN (ed.) English Language Teaching Textbooks: Content, Consumption, Production. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 262–98.
47.
TightM (2014) Working in separate silos? What citation patterns reveal about higher education research internationally. Higher Education68(3): 379–95.
48.
TimmisI (2014) Writing materials for publication: questions raised and lessons learned. In: HarwoodN (ed.) English Language Teaching Textbooks: Content, Consumption, Production. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 241–61.
49.
TsuiABM (2007) Complexities of identity formation: a narrative inquiry of an EFL teacher. TESOL Quarterly41(4): 657–80.
50.
TysonHWoodwardA (1989) Why students aren’t learning very much from textbooks. Educational Leadership47(3): 14–17.
51.
ValenciaSWPlaceNAMartinSDGrossmanPL (2006) Curriculum materials for elementary reading: shackles and scaffolds for four beginning teachers. The Elementary School Journal107(1): 93–120.
52.
VásquezC (2011) TESOL, teacher identity, and the need for ‘small story’ research. TESOL Quarterly45(3): 535–45.
53.
WetteR (2009) Making the instructional curriculum as an interactive, contextualized process: case studies of seven ESOL teachers. Language Teaching Research13(4): 337–65.
54.
WetteR (2010) Professional knowledge in action: how experienced ESOL teachers respond to feedback from learners within syllabus and contextual constraints. System38(4): 569–79.
55.
WetteR (2011) Meeting curriculum, learning and settlement needs: teachers’ use of materials in courses for adult migrants. TESOL in Context21(1): 59–77.
56.
ZiebarthSWHartEWMarcusRRitsemaBSchoenHLWalkerR (2009) High school teachers as negotiators between curriculum intentions and enactment: the dynamics of mathematics curriculum development. In: RemillardJTHerbel-EisenmannBALloydGM (eds) Mathematics Teachers at Work: Connecting Curriculum Materials and Classroom Instruction. New York: Routledge, 171–89.
