The study aimed at exploring the psychological as well as educational outcomes of strategies awareness and use. We set out to examine the effect of reading strategic investment on language achievement and problem solving ability (PSA). The participating EFL learners were heterogeneous in terms of reading instruction; two of the intact groups had received normal instruction studying selected short stories with a primary focus on vocabulary development and comprehension check, whereas the second group had been trained under a strategies-based instruction over two consecutive semesters by one of the researchers. A descriptive data collection procedure and follow-up exploratory and confirmatory analyses revealed metacognitive and cognitive strategies positively affect the enhancement of PSA and reading comprehension achievement (RCA). It was found, however, that metacognitive strategies are more effective for the development of PSA whereas cognitive strategies contribute to RCA more than their metacognitive counterparts.
AdcockD (2000) Comprehensive Assessment of Reading Strategies. USA: Curriculum Associates Inc.
2.
AkinO (1986) Psychology of architectural design. London: Pion.
3.
AkkayaN (2012) The relationships between candidates’ critical thinking skills and their use of reading strategies. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences47: 797–801.
4.
BransfordJSherwoodRVyeNRieserJ (1986) Teaching thinking and problem solving: research foundations. American Psychologist41(10): 1078–89.
5.
CacioppoJPettyR (1982) The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology42(1): 116–31.
6.
CantrellSCarterJ (2009) Relationships among learner characteristics and adolescents’ perceptions about reading strategy use. Reading Psychology30(3): 195–224.
7.
CaverlyDNicholsonSRadcliffeR (2004) The effectiveness of strategic reading instruction for college developmental readers. Journal of College Reading and Learning35(1): 25–49.
8.
ChamotADaleMO'MalleyJSpanosG (1992) Learning and problem solving strategies of ESL students. Bilingual Research Journal16(3–4): 1–28.
9.
ChamotAKeatleyCMeloniCGonglewskiMBartosheskyA (2010) Developing Autonomy in Language Learners. Washington, DC: National Capital Language Resource Center.
10.
ChangED'ZurillaTSannaL (2004) Social Problem Solving: Theory, Research, and Training. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
11.
ChatterjeeSHadiA (2012) Regression Analysis by Example. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
12.
CheungM (2007) Comparison of approaches to constructing confidence intervals for mediating effects using structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal14(2): 227–46.
13.
ClarkMSilbersteinS (1977) Toward a realization of psycholinguistic principles in the ESL reading class. Language Learning27(1): 48–65.
14.
CoadyJ (1979) A psycholinguistic model of the ESL reader. In: BarkmanRJordanR (eds) Reading in a Second Language. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 5–12.
15.
CohenA (1998) Strategies in Learning and Using a Second Language. Harlow: Longman.
16.
CohenA (2000) Strategies-based instruction for learners of a second language. NASSP Bulletin84(612): 10–18.
17.
ConlinM (2005) Patterns Plus: A Short Prose Reader with Argumentation. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
18.
CubukcuF (2008) Enhancing vocabulary development and reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies. Issues in Educational Research18(1): 1–11.
19.
DavisD (2010) A meta-analysis of comprehension strategy instruction for upper elementary and middle school students. PhD Dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
20.
DenemeS (2010) Cross-cultural differences in language learning strategy preferences: a comparative study. The International Journal of Language, Society, and Culture31(1): 81–89.
21.
DornyeiZSkehanP (2003) Individual differences in L2 learning. In: DoughtyCLongM (eds) The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 589–630.
22.
D’ZurillaTGoldfriedM (1971) Problem solving and behavior modification. Journal of Abnormal Psychology78(1): 107-126.
23.
EhrmanM andOxfordR (1989) Effects of sex differences, career choice, and psychological type on adult language learning strategies. The Modern Language Journal73(1): 1–13.
24.
ElliotTGodshallFShroutJWittyT (1990) Problem-solving appraisal, self-reported study habits, and performance of academically at-risk college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology37(2): 203–207.
25.
EllisR (1994) The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
ErozkanA (2013) The effect of communication skills and interpersonal problem solving skills on social self-efficacy. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice13(2): 739–45.
27.
FarrellT (2001) Teaching reading strategies: it takes time. Reading in a Foreign Language13(2): 631–46.
28.
HairJTathamRAndersonRBlackW (2006) Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
29.
HeppnerP (1988) The Problem Solving Inventory: Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
30.
HeppnerPKrauskopfC (1987) An information-processing approach to personal problem solving. The Counseling Psychologist15(3): 371–447.
31.
HeppnerPPetersenC (1982) The development and implications of a personal problem-solving inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology29(1): 66–76.
32.
HeppnerPReederBLarsonL (1983) Cognitive variables associated with personal problem solving appraisal: implications for counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology30(4): 537–45.
33.
JanisIMannL (1977) Decision Making. New York: Free Press.
KnappKSeidhoferBWiddowsonH (2009) Handbook of Foreign Language Communication and Learning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
36.
KoehlerA (2007) Raising awareness of self-efficacy through self-regulated learning strategies for reading in a secondary ESL classroom. MA Dissertation, Hamline University, St Paul, MN, USA.
37.
KongA (2006) Connections between L1 and l2 readings: reading strategies used by four Chinese adult readers. The Reading Matrix6(2): 19–45.
38.
LarsonL (1987) Problem solving appraisal: a necessary ingredient in the career-planning process. Journal of Career Development14(1): 24–34.
39.
LarsonLHeppnerP (1985) The relationship of problem-solving appraisal to career decision and indecision. Journal of Vocational Behavior26(1): 55–65.
40.
LarsonLPierselWImaoRAllenS (1990) Significant predictors of the problem solving appraisal. Journal of Counseling Psychology37(4): 482–90.
41.
LeiPWuQ (2007) An NCME instructional module on introduction to structural equation modeling: issues and practical considerations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice26(3): 33–43.
42.
MacCallumRAustinJ (2000) Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology51(1): 201–26.
43.
MacNairRElliottT (1992) Self-perceived problem-solving ability, stress appraisal, and coping over time. Journal of Research in Personality26(2): 150–64.
44.
MagaldiL (2010) Metacognitive strategies-based instruction to support learner autonomy in language learning. Revista Canaria De Estudios Ingleses61(1): 73–86.
45.
MannV (1984) Reading skill and language skill. Development Review4(1): 1–15.
46.
MillerC (2006) Developmental relationships between language and theory of mind. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology15(2): 142–54.
47.
MokhtariKSheoreyR (2002) Measuring ESL students reading strategies. Journal of Developmental Education25(3): 2–10.
48.
MontgomeryDPeckEViningG (2012) Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
49.
MoralesJHolguinB (2009) Guidance in reading strategies: a first step towards autonomous learning in a semi-distance education program. Profile11(1): 41–56.
50.
MoskovskyCAlrabaiFPaoliniSRatchevaS (2013) The effects of teachers’ motivational strategies on learners’ motivation: a controlled investigation of second language acquisition. Language Learning63(1): 34–62.
51.
NealGHeppnerP (1986) Problem solving self-appraisal, awareness, and utilization of campus helping resources. Journal of Counseling Psychology33(1): 39–44.
52.
NezuARonanG (1988) Social problem solving as a moderator of stress related depressive symptoms: a prospective analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology35(2): 134–38.
53.
NguyenLGuY (2013) Strategy-based instruction: a learner-focused approach to developing learner autonomy. Language Teaching Research17(1): 19–30.
54.
Nowruzi KhiabaniM (2001) Brush Up Your English: An Advanced Reading Course. Tehran: Ney Publications.
55.
O'malleyJChamotA (1990) Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
OxfordR (1990) Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. New York: Newbury House.
57.
OxfordR (2003) Language learning styles and strategies: concepts and relationships. IRAL41(4): 271–78.
58.
PallantJ (2007) SPSS Survival Manual. New York: Open University Press.
59.
PurpuraJ (1999) An analysis of the relationships between test takers’ cognitive and metacognitive strategy use and second language test performance. Language Learning47(2): 289–325.
60.
RadwanA (2011) Effects of L2 proficiency and gender on choice of language learning strategies by university students majoring in English. Asian EFL Journal13(1): 114–53.
61.
RichardsJEckstutS (2012) Strategic Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62.
RoustaSGhazi MirsaeedJ (2012) The effect of teaching metacognitive reading strategies on reading self-efficacy of Iranian intermediate EFL students. Journal of Academic and Applied Studies2(1): 10–20.
63.
SalamiSAremuA (2006) Relationship between problem solving ability and study behavior among school-going adolescents in Southwestern Nigeria. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology4(1): 139–54.
64.
SedaghatM (2001) The effects of attitude, motivation, and proficiency level on the use of listening comprehension strategies by Iranian female EFL Students. MA Thesis, Shiraz University, Iran.
65.
SchumackerRLomaxR (2004) A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
66.
ShangH (2010) Reading strategy use, self-efficacy and EFL reading comprehension. Asian EFL Journal12(2): 18–42.
67.
SkehanP (1993) Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. London: Edward Arnold.
68.
SwansonPde La PazS (1998) Teaching effective comprehension strategies to students with learning and reading disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic33(4): 209–19.
69.
TamadaY (1996) The relationship between Japanese learners’ personal factors and their choices of language learning strategies. Modern Language Journal80(12): 120–31.
70.
TaylorP (1968) Modern Short Stories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
71.
TulchinskyTVaravikovaE (2010) What is the new public health?Public Health Reviews32(1): 25–53.
72.
VandergriftL (2002) It was nice to see that our predictions were right: developing metacognition in L2 listening comprehension. The Canadian Modern Language Review58(4): 555–75.
73.
WegmannBKnezevicM (2008) Mosaic: Reading. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
74.
WestonRGoreP (2006) A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist34(6): 719–51.
75.
World Health Organization (1999) Partners in Life Skills Education: Conclusions from a United Nations Inter-agency Meeting. Geneva: Department of Mental Health, Social Change and Mental Health Cluster, WHO.
76.
WilliamsMBurdenL (1997) Psychology for Language Teachers: A Social Constructivist Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77.
WolfEHarringtonKClarkSMillerM (2013) Sample size requirements for structural equation models an evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement73(6): 913–34.
78.
WrightMBrownP (2006) Reading in a modern foreign language: exploring the potential benefits of reading strategy instruction. Language Learning Journal33(1): 22–33.
79.
ZabelC (2004) Comparison of problem-solving perceptions in individuals with controlled versus non-controlled seizure activity. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/997
80.
ZhangL (2001) Awareness in reading: EFL students’ metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies in an acquisition-poor environment. Language Awareness10(4): 268–88.
81.
ZhangL (2008) Constructivist pedagogy in strategic reading instruction: exploring pathways to learner development in the English as a second language (ESL) classroom. Instructional Science36(2): 89–116.
82.
ZimmermanBPonsM (1986) Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal23(4): 614–28.
