Whilst there are studies exploring students’ perspectives of assessment, relatively little is known about how Chinese high school students’ respond to assessment. Students’ perspectives are particularly important because the power of assessment directly impacts on their motivation and attitudes towards schooling. This article explores students’ views of English language assessment in a Chinese high school in Hubei province through ‘draw-a-picture technique’ and subsequent interviews. The main findings show that assessment could invoke both positive and negative feelings; and that tests carried both summative and formative messages. The paper contributes to the understanding of how assessment impacts on students’ lives and discusses the use of draw-a-picture technique as a means of documenting students’ perceptions.
BellP (2001) Content analysis of visual images. In: van LeeuwenTJewittC (eds) Handbook of Visual Analysis. London: SAGE,10–34.
2.
BrownGTLWangZ (2011) Illustrating assessment: how Hong Kong university students conceive of assessment’s purposes. Studies in Higher Education. DOI:10.1080/03075079.2011.616955
3.
ButlerYG (2009) How do teachers observe and evaluate elementary school students’ foreign language performance? A case study from South Korea. TESOL Quarterly43(3): 417–44.
4.
CarlessD (2011) From Testing to Productive Student Learning: Implementing Formative Assessment in Confucian-heritage Settings. New York: Routledge.
5.
CarlessDLamR (2012) The examined life: perspectives of lower primary school students in Hong Kong. Education 3–13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education. DOI:10.1080/03004279.2012.689988
6.
ChengL (2008) The key to success: English language testing in China. Language Testing25(1): 15–37.
7.
ChengLQiL (2006) Description and examination of the National Matriculation English Test. Language Assessment Quarterly3(1): 53–70.
8.
DavisonC (2007) Views from the chalkface: English language school-based assessment in Hong Kong. Language Assessment Quarterly4(1): 37–68.
9.
DavisonCLeungC (2009) Current issues in English language teacher-based assessment. TESOL Quarterly43(3): 393–415.
10.
DengCCarlessD (2010) Examination preparation or effective teaching: conflicting priorities in the implementation of a pedagogic innovation. Language Assessment Quarterly7(4): 285–302.
11.
DörnyeiZUshiodaE (2011) Teaching and Researching Motivation (2nd edn). Harlow: Longman.
12.
FreemanMMathisonS (2009) Researching Children’s Experiences. New York: Guilford Press.
13.
HaneyWRussellMand BebellD (2004) Drawing on education: using drawings to document schooling and support change. Harvard Educational Review74(3): 241–72.
14.
HarrisLRHarnettJABrownGTL (2009) ‘Drawing’ out student conceptions: Using pupils’ pictures to examine their conceptions of assessment. In: McInerneyDMBrownGTLLiemGAD (eds) Student Perspectives on Assessment: What Students Can Tell Us about Assessment for Learning. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, 53–83.
15.
HuhtaAKalajaPPitkänen-HuhtaA (2006) Discursive construction of a high-stakes test: the many faces of a test-taker. Language Testing23(3): 326–50.
16.
JinLCortazziM (2006) Changing practices in Chinese cultures of learning. Language, Culture and Curriculum19(1): 5–20.
17.
LeungCLewkowiczJ (2006) Expanding horizons and unresolved conundrums: language testing and assessment. TESOL Quarterly40(1): 211–34.
18.
LeungCRea-DickinsP (2007) Teacher assessment as policy instrument: contradictions and capacities. Language Assessment Quarterly4(1): 6–36.
19.
LiMBaldaufR (2011) Beyond the curriculum: a Chinese example of issues constraining effective English language teaching. TESOL Quarterly45(4): 793–803.
20.
OxfordRShearinJ (1994) Language learning motivation: expanding the theoretical framework. The Modern Language Journal78(1): 12–28.
21.
QiL (2007) Is testing an efficient agent for pedagogical change? Examining the intended washback of the writing task in a high-stakes English test in China. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice14(1): 51–74.
22.
QiL (2010) Should proofreading go? Examining the section function and washback of the proofreading sub-test in the National Matriculation English Test. In: ChengLCurtisA (eds) English Language Assessment and the Chinese Learner. London: Routledge, 219–33.
23.
ShohamyE (1998) Critical language testing and beyond. Studies in Educational Evaluation24(4): 331–45.
24.
ShohamyE (2007) The power of language, the power of English language and the role of ELT. In: CumminsJDavisonC (eds) International Handbook of English Language Teaching, Vol. 15. New York: Springer, 521–31.
25.
ShohamyEDonitsa-SchmidtSFermanI (1996) Test impact revisited: washback effect over time. Language Testing13(3): 298–317.
26.
WangQ (2007) The national curriculum changes and their effects on English language teaching in the People’s Republic of China. In: CumminsJDavisonC (eds) International Handbook of English Language TeachingVol. 15. New York: Springer, 87–105.
27.
XiaoYSharplingGLiuH (2011) Washback of National Matriculation English Test on students’ learning in Chinese secondary school context. Asian EFL Journal13(3): 103–29.
28.
XuYLiuY (2009) Teacher assessment knowledge and practice: a narrative inquiry of a Chinese college EFL teacher’s experience. TESOL Quarterly43(3): 493–513.
