The Bottom-up Move within Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development: A Pedagogical Application for Teaching Agreement in Spanish as a Foreign Language

Abstract

This paper presents the findings of a longitudinal study in which two instructional methods to teach agreement features to first-year university students specializing in Spanish in Japan are compared. On the one hand, the control group was exposed to the traditional top-down teaching of agreement paradigms and were instructed to practice them through pattern repetition. On the other, a bottom-up move informed by Vygotsky and Gal’perin’s theories of conceptual formation was induced in the experimental group by using schemata and verbalization during the task of using agreement features. The data suggest that (a) the material expression of conceptual relationships (e.g. through schemata) and (b) the verbal rendition of rules or conceptual connections, and (c) the overall framing of the task as a bottom-up move actually helped acquirers in their mastery of gender and number agreement. The results of the intervention also support Kim and Kellogg (2006) and Centeno-Cortés and Jiménez Jiménez’s (2004) paradoxical view that L1 conceptual elaboration and organization aimed at solving L2 language tasks plays an important role in L2 acquisition. The data seem to indicate that there is room for encouraging learners’ hypothesis-making in the L1 under certain conditions, such as the kind of guided induction designed for this research and the one advanced by Herron and Tomasello (1992), and Tomasello and Herron’s (1988a, 1988b). L2 native instructors who dismiss or suppress acquirers’ talk in their L1 in their communication classes should assess if that talk is part of an important process of hypothesis-making or verbalization of language rules or not and act accordingly. L1 exchanges linked to hypothesis-making or task organization seem to foster L2 development and therefore should not be treated like a waste of time by ‘Communication’ instructors. In sum, the bottom-up move within Vygotsky’s ZPD is suggested as a feasible, although more elaborate intervention, as the findings on the intervention suggest.

Keywords

SLA bottom-up move top-down teaching Spanish communication Vygotsky’s sociogenetic model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arievitch

Haenen

(2005) Connecting sociocultural theory and educational practice: Gal’perin’s approach. Educational Psychologist 40(3):155-65.

Centeno-Cortés

Jiménez

(2004) Problem-solving tasks in a foreign language: the importance of the L1 in private verbal thinking. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 14(1): 7-35.

Davydov

(1998) The concept of developmental teaching. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology 36(4), 11-36.

Escandón

(2007) Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development as a unifying approach towards teaching L2 grammar and communication in Japan. Forum for Foreign Language Education 6: 83-100.

Fernández

(1997) Interlengua y análisis de errores en el aprendizaje de español cono lengua extranjera. Madrid: Edelsa.

Gal’perin

(1969) Stages in the development of mental acts. In: Cole

Maltzman

(eds) A Handbook of Contemporary Soviet Psychology. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

Gal’perin

P I

(1989) Study of the intellectual development of the child. Soviet Psychology 27(4).

Gal’perin

(1992) Stage-by-stage formation as a method of psychological investigation. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology 30(4).

Gal’perin

Talyzina

(1961) Formation of elementary geometrical concepts and their dependence on directed participation by the pupils (trans. Kisch

Crawford

Asher

) In: O’Connor

(ed.) Recent Soviet Psychology. New York: Pergamon Press, 247-72.

10.

Hedegaard

(2002) Learning and Child Development: a Cultural-historical Study. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.

11.

Herron

Tomasello

(1992) Acquiring grammatical structures by guided induction. The French Review 65(5): 708-18.

12.

Kim

Kellogg

(2006) Rules out of roles: differences in play language and their developmental significance. Applied Linguistics 28(1): 25-45.

13.

Krashen

(1985) The Input Hypothesis:Issues and Implications. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

14.

Krashen

Terrell

(1983) The Natural Approach. Hayward, CA: Alemany Press.

15.

Lantolf

Thorne

(2006) Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

16.

Lee

(1985) Intellectual origins of Vygotsky’s semiotic analysis. In: Wertsch

(ed.) Culture, Communication and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 66-93.

17.

Negueruela

(2003) Systemic-Theoretical Instruction and L2 development: a sociocultural approach to teaching-learning and researching L2 learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

18.

Negueruela

(2008) Revolutionary pedagogies: learning that leads (to) second language development. In: Lantolf

Poehner

(eds) Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of Second Languages. Oakville, CT: Equinox.

19.

Pienemann

(1998) Language Processing and Second Language Development:Processability Theory. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

20.

Salomon

(1991) On the cognitive effects of technology. In: Landsman

(ed) Culture, Schooling and Psychological Development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

21.

Sanz

(2006) Restructuring processes of interlanguages: the acquisition of Spanish COMP structures by Japanese speakers. In: Sanz

. (eds) Hacia un método más eficaz de español para hablantes de japonés, Annals of Foreign Studies 65.

22.

Sanz

(2010a) Lessening fossilization in L2 acquisition: a matter of linguistic theory. Annals of Foreign Studies 71(7).

23.

Sanz

(2010b) Imperfect acquisition: implicit learning and explicit reasoning in the process of learning the Spanish aspectual system. Annals of Foreign Studies 71(7).

24.

Sanz

Fukushima

(2003) Studies on the acquisition of Spanish by native speakers of Japanese. Annals of Foreign Studies 57.

25.

Stern

(1983) Fundamental Concepts of Language Teaching (10th edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

26.

Tomasello

Herron

(1988a) Learning grammatical structures in a foreign language: modelling versus feedback. The French Review 61(6): 910-22.

27.

Tomasello

Herron

(1988b) Down the garden path: inducing and correcting overgeneralization errors in the foreign language classroom. Applied Psycholinguistics 9: 237-46.

28.

Vygotsky

(1978) Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. In: Cole

John-Steiner

Scribner

Souberman

(eds) (Original work published in 1930, 1933 and 1935). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

29.

Vygotsky

(1986) Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

30.

Vygotsky

(1987) Thinking and speech (trans. Minick

). In: Rieber

Carton

(eds), The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky: Volume 1, Problems of General Psychology. New York: Plenum Press.