Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Small group work in EFL classrooms has been largely accepted as an effective strategy in the development of students’ communicative proficiency in English. This acceptance has occurred despite a lack of research in key areas about what actually happens when students work in groups in real classrooms.

This study examines both quantitative and qualitative data relating to student behaviour in groups collected in EFL lessons in China. Tape recordings of group discussions were analysed and data dealing with turn taking and length of turns were calculated. Interview data were also collected and student perceptions of their contributions to the discussions are presented.

Results highlight the complexity of what happens when students work in groups in EFL lessons. The study shows that it is difficult to generalize about student behaviour in group work and though there are some aspects of how students behave in groups that are well understood, there are still many questions that remain unexplored regarding how group work functions in the EFL setting.

Keywords

China classroom strategy data discussions dyads group work

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allwright, R. 1984 ‘Why Don’t Learners Learn What Teachers Teach? The Interaction Hypothesis’, in D.M. Singleton and D.G. Little (eds.), Language Learning in Formal and Informal Contexts ( Dublin: IRAAL ).

Aston, Guy 1986 ‘Trouble-Shooting in Interaction with Learners: The More the Merrier?’ , Applied Linguistics 7.2: 128-143 .

Breen, M.P. 1987 ‘Learner Contributions in Task-Based Learning’, in Christopher Candlin and Dermot Murphy (eds.), Language Learning Tasks ( Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall International ).

Dobinson, T. 1999 ‘Why Don’t Learners Recall Certain Vocabulary Items from Lessons?’ , EA Journal 17.1: 34-51 .

Ellis, G. 1996 ‘How Culturally Appropriate Is the Communicative Approach?’ , ELT Journal 50.3: 213-218 .

Flowerdew, Lynne 1998 ‘A Cultural Perspective on Group Work’ , ELT Journal 52.4: 323-329 .

1998 ‘A Classroom Perspective on Negotiation of Meaning’ , Applied Linguistics 19.1: 1-23 .

Holliday, Adrian 1994 Appropriate Methodology and Social Context ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ).

Kramsch, C. , and P. Sullivan 1996 ‘Appropriate Pedagogy’ , ELT Journal 50.3: 199-212 .

10.

Kumaradivelu, B. 1991 ‘Language Learning Tasks: Teacher Intention and Learner Interpretation’ , ELT Journal 45.2: 98-107 .

11.

Leki, Ilona 2001 ‘A Narrow Thinking System: Nonnative-English-Speaking Students in Group Projects across the Curriculum’ , TESOL Quarterly 35.1: 39-67 .

12.

Miller, Lindsay , and Deborah Aldred 2000 ‘Student Teachers’ Perceptions about Communicative Language Teaching’ , RELC Journal 31.1: 1-22 .

13.

Murphy, Jacky 2003 ‘Task-Based Learning: The Interaction between Tasks and Learners’ , ELT Journal 57.4: 352-360 .

14.

Pica, T. , and C. Doughty 1985 ‘The Role of Group Work in Classroom Second Language Acquisition’ , Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7: 233-248 .

15.

Tang, C. 1996 ‘Collaborative Learning: The Latent Dimension in Chinese Students’ Learning’, in D.A. Watkins and J.B. Biggs (eds.), The Chinese Learner: Cultural, Psychological and Contextual Influences ( Melbourne: CERC and ACER ).

16.

Willis, D. 1996 ‘Accuracy, Fluency and Conformity’, in Jane Willis and Dave Willis (eds.), Challenge and Change in Language Teaching ( Oxford: Macmillan, Heinemann).

Group Work in the Efl Classroom in China: A Closer Look

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References