Internet chat was investigated as a potential motivating learning tool in the
language classroom. The purpose of this research was to examine the interaction of
small groups involved in face-to-face discussions and to compare these texts to
interaction that occurred in online groups. Observation and data revealed that
students were generally motivated to communicate in English using Internet chat.
When the groups were compared, it was found that student participation in online
chat groups was more equitable and students showed a preference for chat over
face-to-face conversation. Based upon these findings, we conclude here that Internet
chat can be used to deliver meaningful and appropriate language tasks in the ESL/EFL classroom.
Brown, P.
, and
S. Levinson1978Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage (
London: Cambridge University Press
).
3.
Chun, D.1994‘Using Computer Networking to Facilitate the Acquisition of
Interactive Competence’
, System22:
17-31
.
4.
Cohen, E.1994Designing Groupwork: Strategies for the Heterogeneous Classroom (
New York: Teachers College Press
).
5.
Freiermuth, M.1998‘Using a Chat Program to Promote Group Equity’
, CAELL Journal8.22:
16-24
.
6.
2001‘Native Speakers or Non-Native Speakers: Who Has the Floor?
Online and Face-to-Face Interaction in Culturally Mixed Small Groups’
, Computer Assisted Language Learning14.2:
169-199
.
7.
Gardner, R.
, and
W. Lambert1959‘Motivational Variables in Second Language Acquisition’
, Canadian Journal of Psychology13:
266-272
.
8.
1972Attitudes and Learning in Second Language Learning (
Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers
).
9.
Garton, L.
,
C. Haythornthwaite
and
B. Wellman1997‘Studying Online Social Networks’
, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication3.1:
1-30
. (http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue1/index.html)
10.
Helgesen, M.1993‘Dismantling a Wall of Silence: The “English
Conversation” Class’, in
P. Wadden
(ed.), A Handbook for Teaching English at Japanese Colleges and
Universities (
New York: Oxford University Press
): 37-49.
11.
Inyengar, S.
, and
M. Lepper1999‘Rethinking the Value of Choice: A Cultural Perspective on
Intrinsic Motivation’
, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology76.3:
349-366
.
12.
2000‘When Choice is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing?’
, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology79.6:
995-1006
.
13.
Keller, J.1979‘Motivation and Instructional Design: A Theoretical Perspective’
, Journal of Instructional Development2.4:
26-34
.
14.
1983‘Motivational Design of Instruction’, in
C. Reigeluth
(ed.), Instructional Design Theories and Models (
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
): 386-433.
15.
Kelm, O.1992‘The Use of Synchronous Computer Networks in Second Language
Instruction: A Preliminary Report’
, Foreign Language Annals25:
441-454
.
16.
Kern, R.1995‘Restructuring Classroom Interaction with Networked Computers:
Effects on Quantity and Characteristics of Language Production’
, Modern Language Journal79.4:
457-476
.
17.
Kobayashi, S.
,
B. Redekop
and
R. Porter1992‘Motivation of College English Students’
, The Language Teacher16.1:
7-9, 15
.
18.
MacIntyre, P.
,
R. Clemént
,
Z. Dōrnyei
and
K. Noels1998‘Conceptualizing Willingness to Communicate in a L2: A
Situational Model of L2 Confidence and Affiliation’
, Modern Language Journal82:
545-562
.
19.
McLean, J.1995‘Negotiating a Spoken-English Scheme with Japanese University
Students’, in
J.D. Brown
and
S.O. Yamashita
(eds.), Language Testing in Japan (
Tokyo: Japan Association of Language Teachers
): 136-148.
20.
Nozaki, K.1993‘The Japanese Student and the Foreign Teacher’,
in
P. Wadden
(ed.), A Handbook for Teaching English at Japanese Colleges and
Universities (
New York: Oxford University Press
): 27-33.
21.
Omaggio, A.1986Teaching Language in Context: Proficiency-Oriented Instruction (
Boston: Heinle & Heinle
).
22.
Porter, P.1986‘How Learners Talk to Each Other: Input and Interaction in
Task-Centered Discussions’, in
R.R. Day
(ed.), Talking to Learners: Conversation in SLA (
Rowley, MA: Newbury House
): 200-222.
23.
Sacks, H.
,
M. Schegloff
and
G. Jefferson1974‘A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking in Conversation’
, Language50:
696-735
.
24.
Varonis, E.
, and
S. Gass1985‘Nonnative/nonnative Conversations: A Model for Negotiation of Meaning’
, Applied Linguistics6:
71-90
.
25.
Warschauer, M.1996‘Comparing Face-to-Face and Electronic Discussion in the Second
Language Classroom’
, Calico Journal13:
7-26
.
