Psychological science is facing an explanatory dead-end because it currently offers interpretations rather than scientific explanations without any way to move from mediators to mechanisms. The long-standing promise has always been that future investigators will transform mediators into mechanisms but this promise remains unfulfilled. The missing mechanism information might be discovered by new empirical methods that have yet to be developed, but presently there is little evidence of this. Another approach is to identify an explanatory narrative that already understands psychology in a way that provides the required causal mechanisms. Connectionist network models with sufficient mechanism information to effectively simulate/emulate psychological phenomena provide this perspective because they explain how psychological processing can take place or is brought about. Previously identified core and corollary connectionist network properties/principles function as psychological mechanisms from this perspective.
AndersonJ. R.PirolliP. L. (1984). Spread of activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(4), 791–798. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.10.4.791
6.
BechtelW.AbrahamsenA. (1991). Connectionism and the mind: An introduction to parallel processing in networks. Blackwell.
7.
BhaskarR. (1975). A realist theory of science. Leeds Books.
8.
BhaskarR. (1986). Scietific realism and human emancipation. Verso.
9.
CarlsonN. R.MillerH.HethC. D.DonahoeJ. W.MartinG. N. (2010). Psychology: The science of behavior (7th ed., p. 196). Allyn & Bacon.
10.
ChemtobC. M.RoitblatH. L.HamadaR. S.CarlsonJ. G.TwentymanC. T. (1988). A cognitive action theory of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 2(3), 253–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/0887-6185(88)90006-0
11.
CinS. D.WorthK. A.GerrardM.GibbonsF. X.StoolmillerM.WillsT. A.SargentJ. D. (2009). Watching and drinking: Expectancies, prototypes, and friends’ alcohol use mediate the effect of exposure to alcohol use in movies on adolescent drinking. Health Psychology, 28(4), 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014777
CristalliC. (2019). Narrative explanations. Routledge IHPS preprint. Cristalli C., narrative explanations in integrated history and philosophy of science. In HerringE.JonesK. M.KiprijanovK. S.SellersL. M. (Eds.), The past, the present and the future of integrated history and philosophy of science: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351214827
14.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
15.
FestingerL. (1964). Conflict, decision, and dissonance. Stanford University Press.
16.
FierroC. (2022). How did early north American clinical psychologists get their first personality test? Carl Gustav Jung, the Zurich school of psychiatry, and the development of the “Word Association Test” (1898–1909). History of Psychology, 25(4), 295–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000218
17.
FlusbergS. J.McClellandJ. L. (2014). Connectionism and the emergence of mind. In ChipmanS. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive science (pp. 1–22). Oxford Handbooks online. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199842193.013.5
18.
FoaE. B.KozakM. J. (1986). Emotional processing of fear: Exposure to corrective information. Psychological Bulletin, 99(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.99.1.20
HornikK.StinchcombeM.WhiteH. (1990). Universal approximation of an unknown mapping and its derivatives using multilayer feedforward networks. Neural Networks, 3(5), 551–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/0893-6080(90)90005-6
23.
HoweM. L.WimmerM. C.GagnonN.PlumptonS. (2009). An associative-activation theory of children's and adults' memory illusions. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(2), 229–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.10.002
24.
KredlowM. A.EichenbaumH.OttoM. W. (2018). Memory creation and modification: Enhancing the treatment of psychological disorders. American Psychologist, 73(3), 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000185
25.
LandauerT. K.DumaisS. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211
26.
LeDouxJ. E. (2002). Synaptic self. Penguin Books.
27.
LiS.-C.LindenbergerU.SikströmS. (2001). Aging cognition: From neuromodulation to representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(11), 479–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01769-1
LiS.-C.SikströmS. (2002). Integrative neurocomputational perspective on cognitive aging, neuromodulation, and representation. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 26(7), 795–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(02)00066-0
30.
LilienfeldS. O. (2012). Public skepticism of psychology: Why many people perceive the study of human behavior as unscientific. American Psychologist, 67(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023963
LynchT. R.ChapmanA. L.RosenthalM. Z.KuoJ. R.LinehanM. M. (2006). Mechanisms of change in Dialectical Behavior Therapy: Theoretical and empirical observations. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(4), 459–480. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp20243
33.
MachamerP.DardenL.CraverC. F. (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 67(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1086/392759
McClellandJ. L.RumelhartD. E.The PDP Research Group. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Vol. 2: Psychological and biological models. MIT Press.
36.
MinskyM. I.PapertS. A. (1969). Perceptrons. MIT Press.
37.
O’ReillyR. C.MunakataY. (2000). Computational explorations in cognitive neuroscience: Understanding the mind by simulating the brain. The MIT Press.
38.
OtgaarH.HoweM. L.MurisP.MerckelbachH. (2019). Associative activation as a mechanism underlying false memory formation. Clinical Psychological Science, 7(2), 191–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618807189
39.
OtgaarH.MurisP.HoweM. L.MerckelbachH. (2017). What drives false memories in psychopathology? A case for associative activation. Clinical Psychological Science, 5(6), 1048–1069. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702617724424
40.
PenningtonB. F. (2014). Explaining abnormal behavior: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Guilford.
ReadS. J.MillerL. C. (2002). Virtual personalities: A neural network model of personality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(4), 357–369. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0604_10
43.
ReadS. J.MonroeB. M. (2019). Modeling cognitive dissonance as a parallel constraint satisfaction network with learning. In Harmon-JonesE. (Ed.), Cognitive dissonance: Reexamining a pivotal theory in psychology (pp. 197–226). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000135-010
44.
ReadS. J.MonroeB. M.BrownsteinA. L.YangY.ChopraG.MillerL. C. (2010). A neural network model of the structure and dynamics of human personality. Psychological Review, 117(1), 61–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018131
45.
RumelhartD. E.McClellandJ. L.The PDP Research Group. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Vol. 1: Foundations. MIT Press.
46.
RychlakJ. F. (1981). A philosophy of science for personality theory (2nd ed.): Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company.
47.
SayerA. (1992). Method in social science. Books Run.
48.
SayerA. (2000). Realism and social science. Sage Publications.mind.
49.
TeoT. (2012). Psychology is still a problematic science and the public knows it. American Psychologist, 67(9), 807–808. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030084
50.
ThagardP. (2000). Coherence in Thought and Action. The MIT Press.
51.
ThomasM.McClellandJ. L. (2023). Connectionist models of cognition. In The Cambridge handbook of computational cognitive sciences. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108755610.005
52.
TryonW. W. (1999). A bidirectional associative memory explanation of posttraumatic stress disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 19(7), 789–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(98)00061-0
53.
TryonW. W. (2005). Possible mechanisms for why desensitization and exposure therapy work. Clinical Psychology Review, 25(1), 67–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2004.08.005
54.
TryonW. W. (2012). A connectionist network approach to psychological science: Core and corollary principles. Review of General Psychology, 16(3), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027135
55.
TryonW. W. (2014). Cognitive neuroscience and psychotherapy: Network principles for a unified theory. Elsevier.
TryonW. W.McKayD. (2009). Memory modification as an outcome variable in anxiety disorder treatment. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23(4), 546–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.11.003
58.
TryonW. W.MisurellJ. R. (2008). Dissonance induction and reduction: A possible principle and connectionist mechanism for why therapies are effective. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(8), 1297–1309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.06.003
59.
Van OverwalleF.JordensK. (2002). An adaptive connectionist model of cognitive dissonance. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(3), 204–231. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0603_6
60.
WilkerS.KolassaI.-T. (2013). The formation of a neural fear network in posttraumatic stress disorder: Insights from molecular genetics. Clinical Psychological Science, 1(4), 452–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702613479583
61.
WinkielmanP.HalberstadtJ.FazendeiroT.CattyS. (2006). Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind. Psychological Science, 17(9), 799–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01785.x
