We investigate how a leader’s use of humor might change the perceptions of that leader’s feedback, which then influences perceptions of leader-member exchange (LMX). Additionally, we explore how employee coping humor and situational attributions impact this relationship. A 2 (Leader Behavior: Abusive, Supportive) × 2 (Leader Humor: Present, Not Present) between-subjects experimental design was utilized (N = 467). Participants read a vignette describing an interaction between a leader and a subordinate and imagined themselves as the subordinate. Leader feedback interacted with both humor condition and employee coping humor to predict abusive supervision (AS). Furthermore, these behaviors indirectly affected LMX through AS. Both injury attributions and performance attributions moderated the relationship between abusive supervision and LMX. We discuss the interplay of leader behaviors, humor use, and coping humor as employee job resources. There is evidence of a potential harmful effect of humor use by leaders on employee AS perceptions and subsequently on LMX perceptions, specifically in situations without abusive behaviors. Leader use of humor is not always positive when providing feedback to employees. If leaders provide positive feedback and then joke with employees, they can be perceived as abusive.
AbelM. (2002). Humor, stress, and coping strategies. Humor - International Journal of Humor Research, 15(4), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.15.4.365
2.
AguinisH.BradleyK. (2014). Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organizational Research Methods, 17(4), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114547952
3.
ArmstrongS.QiM. (2020). The influence of leader-follower cognitive style similarity on followers’ organizational citizenship behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 1265. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01265
4.
BartzikM.BentrupA.HillS.BleyM.von HirschhausenE.KrauseG.AhausP.Dahl-DichmannA.PeiferC. (2021). Care for joy: Evaluation of a humor intervention and its effects on stress, flow experience, work enjoyment, and meaningfulness of work. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, Article 667821. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.667821
5.
BhattacharjeeA.SarkarA. (2022). Abusive supervision: A systematic literature review. Management Review Quarterly, 74(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-022-00291-8
6.
BreesJ.MartinkoM.HarveyP. (2016). Abusive supervision: Subordinate personality or supervisor behavior?Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(2), 405–419. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-04-2014-0129
7.
Brender-IlanY.ReizerA. (2021). How do we perceive a humorous manager? Manager humor, impression management, and employee willingness to work with the manager. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 628350. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.628350
8.
BurtonJ.HooblerJ.KernanM. (2011). When research setting is important: The influence of subordinate self-esteem on reactions to abusive supervision. Organization Management Journal, 8(3), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1057/omj.2011.24
9.
BurtonJ.TaylorS.BarberL. (2014). Understanding internal, external, and relational attributions for abusive supervision. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(6), 871–891. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1939
10.
ByrneD. (1971). The attraction paradigm. Academic Press.
11.
ChengD.AmarnaniR.LeT.RestubogS. (2018). Laughter is (powerful) medicine: The effects of humor exposure on the well-being of victims of aggression. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9548-7
12.
ChengD.ChanX. W.AmarnaniR. K.FarivarF. (2021). Finding humor in work–life conflict: Distinguishing the effects of individual and co-worker humor. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 125, 103538.
13.
De BruinR.BakerC.SkinnerT.FinkelsteinL.TilleryM. (2024). Was that zinger supposed to sting? The interaction between humor use and abusive supervision. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RW8VD
14.
DulebohnJ.BommerW.LidenR.BrouerR.FerrisG. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715–1759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311415280
15.
DulebohnJ. H.BommerW. H.LidenR. C.BrouerR. L.FerrisG. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of management, 38(6), 1715–1759.
16.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
17.
FischerT.TianA.LeeA.HughesD. (2021). Abusive supervision: A systematic review and fundamental rethink. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(6), Article 101540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101540
18.
FordT. E.BoxerC. F.ArmstrongJ.EdelJ. R. (2008). More than “just a joke”: The prejudice-releasing function of sexist humor. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616720731002
19.
GibsonC.SagarinB. J. (2023). Pun-intentionally sadistic: Is punning a manifestation of everyday sadism?Personality and Individual Differences, 203, Article 111997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111997
20.
GkorezisP.BellouV. (2016). The relationship between leader self-deprecating humor and perceived effectiveness: Trust in leader as a mediator. The Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(7), 882–898. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-11-2014-0231
21.
HeiderF. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley.
22.
HoptionC.BarlingJ.TurnerN. (2013). “It’s not you, it’s me”: Transformational leadership and self-deprecating humor. The Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 34(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731311289947
23.
HuangL.LinC.LuS. (2020). The relationship between abusive supervision and employee’s reaction: The job demands-resources model perspective. Personnel Review, 49(9), 2035–2054. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-01-2019-0002
24.
HuangM.JuD.YamK.LiuS.QinX.TianG. (2023). Employee humor can shield them from abusive supervision. Journal of Business Ethics, 186(2), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05208-9
25.
JohnsonR.VenusM.LanajK.MaoC.ChangC. (2012). Leader identity as an antecedent of the frequency and consistency of transformational, consideration, and abusive leadership behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1262–1272. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029043
26.
JunK.LeeJ. (2023). How does abusive supervision impair follower’s intrinsic motivation? Testing roles of positive affect and leader humor expression. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 43(10), Article 3. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05018-w
27.
KarakowskyL.PodolskyM.ElangovanA. R. (2020). Signaling trustworthiness: The effect of leader humor on feedback-seeking behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 160(2), 170–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2019.1620161
KelleyH. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In Nebraska symposium on motivation. University of Nebraska Press.
30.
KongD. T.CooperC. D.SosikJ. J. (2019). The state of research on leader humor. Organizational psychology review, 9(1), 3–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386619846948
31.
KuiperN. A.MartinR. A.DanceK. A. (1992). Sense of humour and enhanced quality of life. Personality and individual differences, 13(12), 1273–1283.
32.
KuiperN.MartinR.OlingerL. (1993). Coping humour, stress, and cognitive appraisals. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 25(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0078791
33.
LazarusR.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
34.
LefcourtH. (2001). The humor solution. In SnyderC. R. (Ed.), Coping with stress: Effective people and processes (pp. 68–92). London: Oxford Univesity Press.
35.
LefcourtH. M.MartinR. A. (2012). Humor and life stress: Antidote to adversity. Springer Science & Business Media.
36.
León-PérezJ.Cantero-SánchezF.Fernández-CansecoÁ.León-RubioJ. (2021). Effectiveness of a humor-based training for reducing employees’ distress. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21), Article 11177. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111177
37.
LidenR.MaslynJ. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1), 43–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(99)80053-1
38.
LiuD.LiaoH.LoiR. (2012). The dark side of leadership: A three-level investigation of the cascading effect of abusive supervision on employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1187–1212. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0
39.
MackeyJ.FriederR.BreesJ.MartinkoM. (2017). Abusive supervision: A meta-analysis and empirical review. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1940–1965. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315573997
40.
MartinR.DobbinJ. (1988). Sense of humor, hassles, and immunoglobulin A: Evidence for a stress-moderating effect of humor. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 18(2), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.2190/724B-3V06-QC5N-6587
41.
MawritzM.DustS.ResickC. (2014). Hostile climate, abusive supervision, and employee coping: Does conscientiousness matter?Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 737–747. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035863
Mesmer-MagnusJ.GlewD.ViswesvaranC. (2012). A meta-analysis of positive humor in the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(2), 155–190. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941211199554
44.
Mesmer-MagnusJ.GuidiceR.AndrewsM.OechslinR. (2018). The effects of supervisor humour on employee attitudes. The Journal of Management Development, 37(9/10), 697–710. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmd-01-2018-0034
45.
OktugZ. (2017). The moderating role of employees’ humor styles on the relationship between job stress and emotional exhaustion. International Business Research, 10(4), 131–138.
46.
OrenL.TzinerA.SharoniG.AmorI.AlonP. (2012). Relations between leader‐subordinate personality similarity and job attitudes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(5), 479–496.
47.
PeytonT.ZigarmiD.FowlerS. (2019). Examining the relationship between leaders’ power use, followers’ motivational outlooks, and followers’ work intentions. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 2620. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02620
48.
PletscherM. (2024). When humor works: Impact of humour style similarity on supervisor-subordinate relationship. Central European Business Review, 13(1), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.350
49.
RiceD. B.YoungN. C.SheridanS. (2021). Improving employee emotional and behavioral investments through the trickle-down effect of organizational inclusiveness and the role of moral supervisors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36(2), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-019-09675-2
50.
SchatA. C. H.FroneM. R.KellowayE. K. (2006). Handbook of workplace violence. Handbook of Workplace Violence (pp. 47–90).
51.
SchynsB.DayD. (2010). Critique and review of leader–member exchange theory: Issues of agreement, consensus, and excellence. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 19(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320903024922
52.
ShanockL.EisenbergerR. (2006). When supervisors feel supported: Relationships with subordinates’ perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 689–695. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.689
53.
SliterM.KaleA.YuanZ. (2014). Is humor the best medicine? The buffering effect of coping humor on traumatic stressors in firefighters. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(2), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1868
54.
SmedemaM.CatalanoD.EbenerD. (2010). The relationship of coping, self-worth, and subjective well-being: A structural equation model. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 53(3), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034355209358272
55.
TepperB. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556375
56.
TepperB. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3), 261–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307300812
57.
TepperB. J.SimonL.ParkH. M. (2017). Abusive supervision. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 123–152.
58.
ThauS.BennettR. J.MitchellM. S.MarrsM. B. (2009). How management style moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance: An uncertainty management theory perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.06.003
59.
WangH.LawK.HackettR.WangD.ChenZ. (2005). Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers’ performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17407908
60.
WijewardenaN.HärtelC.SamaratungeR. (2017). Using humor and boosting emotions: An affect-based study of managerial humor, employees’ emotions and psychological capital. Human Relations, 70(11), 1316–1341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717691809
61.
WijewardenaN.SamaratungeR.HartelC. (2019). Managing with humor: A novel approach to building positive employee emotions and psychological resources. Springer.
62.
WintonB.SabolM. (2023). Knock, knock, who’s there? Leader humor, leader–member exchange, and the dimensions of engagement. Journal of General Management, 48(3), 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063070221107129
63.
YamK.ChristianM.WeiW.LiaoZ.NaiJ. (2017). The mixed blessing of leader sense of humor: Examining costs and benefits. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 348–369. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.1088
64.
YangJ.LiuY.StackhouseM.WangW. (2020). Forgiveness and attribution: When abusive supervision enhances performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 35(7), 575–587. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-04-2019-0239
65.
YuklG.O’DonnellM.TaberT. (2009). Influence of leader behaviors on the leader-member exchange relationship. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(4), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940910952697
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
