The Impression Management Consequences of Hiding Effort Among Adolescents: The Mediating Role of Authenticity

Abstract

Hiding effort has become prevalent among adolescents; however, whether this behavior benefits or harms their social impression remains unclear. The study explored whether hiding effort is an effective impression management strategy to obtain high popularity, likeability, interpersonal trust, and cooperation intention from peers. Using hypothetical scenarios, Study 1 (N = 243) found that hiding effort led to lower popularity, likeability, interpersonal trust, and cooperation intention among adolescents. Study 2 (N = 176) replicated the findings of Study 1 and found that the hiding-effort adolescents did not realize these negative consequences. Furthermore, Study 2 revealed that authenticity mediated the effect of hiding effort on popularity, likeability, interpersonal trust, and cooperation intention. The findings provided theoretical and practical implications for educators and adolescents. Educators should foster environments where effort and authenticity are rewarded. Adolescents should understand the cost of hiding efforts from peers.

Keywords

Impression management hiding effort authenticity adolescents popularity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alam

Ullah

AlDhaen

F. S.

AlDhaen

Ahmad

Scholz

(2021). Towards explaining knowledge hiding through relationship conflict, frustration, and irritability: The case of public sector teaching hospitals. Sustainability, 13(22), Article 12598. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212598

Alchin

C. E.

Machin

T. M.

Martin

Burton

L. J.

(2023). Authenticity and inauthenticity in adolescents: A scoping review. Adolescent Research Review, 9(2), 279–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-023-00218-8

Altman

Taylor

D. A.

(1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Bailey

E. R.

Matz

S. C.

Youyou

Iyengar

S. S.

(2020). Authentic self-expression on social media is associated with greater subjective well-being. Nature Communications, 11(1), 4889–4899. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18539-w

Branje

(2022). Adolescent identity development in context. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45, Article 101286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.11.006

Bravo

Ortega-Ruiz

Veenstra

Engels

M. C.

Romera

E. M.

(2022). Friendship selection and influence processes for popularity in early and mid-adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 94(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12004

Cheng

T. W.

Mills

K. L.

Pfeifer

J. H.

(2024). Revisiting adolescence as a sensitive period for sociocultural processing. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 164, Article 105820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105820

Cillessen

A. H. N.

Marks

P. E. L.

(2011). Conceptualizing and measuring popularity. In Cillessen

A. H. N.

Schwartz

Mayeux

(Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 25–56). Guilford Press.

Covington

M. V.

Omelich

C. L.

(1979). Effort: The double-edged sword in school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(2), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.71.2.169

10.

de Vries

R. E.

Pronk

Olthof

Goossens

F. A.

(2020). Getting along and/or getting ahead: Differential Hexaco personality correlates of likeability and popularity among adolescents. European Journal of Personality, 34(2), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2243

11.

Emmerich

A. I.

Knoll

Rigotti

(2019). The authenticity of the others: How teammates’ authenticity relates to our well-being. Small Group Research, 51(2), 175–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496419874877

12.

Erikson

E. H.

(1994). Identity: Youth and crisis. WW Norton & Company.

13.

Faul

Erdfelder

Buchner

Lang

A. G.

(2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

14.

Ferguson

S. M.

Ryan

A. M.

(2019). It’s lonely at the top: Adolescent students' peer-perceived popularity and self-perceived social contentment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(2), 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0970-y

15.

Gino

Sezer

Huang

(2020). To be or not to be your authentic self? Catering to others’ preferences hinders performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 158, 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.01.003

16.

Goffman

(1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.

17.

Harter

(2002). Authenticity. In Snyder

C. R.

Lopez

J. S.

(Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 382–394). Oxford University Press.

18.

Hayes

A. F.

(2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.

19.

Heyder

Kessels

(2017). Boys don’t work? On the psychological benefits of showing low effort in high school. Sex Roles, 77(1-2), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0683-1

20.

Jackson

Nyström

A.-S.

(2014). ‘Smart students get perfect scores in tests without studying much’: Why is an effortless achiever identity attractive, and for whom is it possible? Research Papers in Education, 30(4), 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2014.970226

21.

John

L. K.

Barasz

Norton

M. I.

(2016). Hiding personal information reveals the worst. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(4), 954–959. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516868113

22.

Juvonen

(2000). The social functions of attributional face-saving tactics among early adolescents. Educational Psychology Review, 12(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009080816191

23.

Juvonen

Murdock

T. B.

(1993). How to promote social approval: Effects of audience and achievement outcome on publicly communicated attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(2), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.365

24.

Juvonen

Murdock

T. B.

(1995). Grade-level differences in the social value of effort: Implication for self-presentation tactics of early adolescents. Child Development, 66(6), 1694–1705. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131904

25.

Kelley

N. J.

Davis

W. E.

Dang

Liu

Wildschut

Sedikides

(2022). Nostalgia confers psychological wellbeing by increasing authenticity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 102, Article 104379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104379

26.

Keselman

H. J.

Huberty

C. J.

Lix

L. M.

Olejnik

Cribbie

R. A.

Donahue

Levin

J. R.

(1998). Statistical practices of educational researchers: An analysis of their ANOVA, MANOVA, and ANCOVA analyses. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 350–386. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430680033

27.

Kim

T.-Y.

David

E. M.

Chen

Liang

(2023). Authenticity or self-enhancement? Effects of self-presentation and authentic leadership on trust and performance. Journal of Management, 49(3), 944–973. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211063807

28.

Kun

(1977). Development of the magnitude-covariation and compensation schemata in ability and effort attributions of performance. Child Development, 48(3), 862–873. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128335

29.

Laursen

Veenstra

(2021). Toward understanding the functions of peer influence: A summary and synthesis of recent empirical research. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 31(4), 889–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12606

30.

Leary

M. R.

Kowalski

R. M.

(1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.34

31.

Lenton

A. P.

Slabu

Sedikides

Power

(2013). I feel good, therefore I am real: Testing the causal influence of mood on state authenticity. Cognition and Emotion, 27(7), 1202–1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.778818

32.

Lsane

Sweigard

Czopp

Howard

Burns

M. J.

(1999). The effects of student academic presentation on perception of gender and sociability. North American Journal of Psychology, 1(2), 173–188. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cps_facarticles/1077

33.

Luo

Hancock

J. T.

(2020). Self-disclosure and social media: Motivations, mechanisms and psychological well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31(SI), 110–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.019

34.

McHale

Taylor

Bengoechea

Norton

O'Shea

Woods

(2022). A systematic literature review of peer-led strategies for promoting physical activity levels of adolescents. Health Education and Behavior, 49(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981211044988

35.

Meehan

Z. M.

Hubbard

J. A.

Moore

C. C.

Mlawer

(2024). Susceptibility to peer influence in adolescents: Associations between psychophysiology and behavior. Development and Psychopathology, 36(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579422000967

36.

Meeus

(2011). The study of adolescent identity formation 2000-2010: A review of longitudinal research. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00716.x

37.

Meijs

Cillessen

A. H.

Scholte

R. H.

Segers

Spijkerman

(2010). Social intelligence and academic achievement as predictors of adolescent popularity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(1), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9373-9

38.

Ragelienė

(2016). Links of adolescents’ identity development and relationship with peers: A systematic literature review. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 25(2), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-016-0044-8

39.

Roberts

A. R.

Levine

E. E.

Sezer

(2021). Hiding success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(5), 1261–1286. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000322

40.

Rudolph

K. D.

(2021). Understanding peer relationships during childhood and adolescence through the lens of social motivation. Understanding peer relationships during childhood and adolescence through the lens of social motivation (8, pp. 105–151). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2020.08.001

41.

Ryan

A. M.

Shim

S. S.

Makara

K. A.

(2013). Changes in academic adjustment and relational self-worth across the transition to middle school. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(9), 1372–1384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9984-7

42.

Saidah

Louvet

Pansu

(2019). Are students who make an effort perceived as successful or just liked by their teachers? Social Psychology of Education, 22, 405–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-019-09481-x

43.

Seok

Doom

J. R.

(2022). Adolescents' social support networks and long-term psychosocial outcomes. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 39(12), 3775–3798. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221109021

44.

Sezer

(2022). Impression (mis)management: When what you say is not what they hear. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.025

45.

Sohmer

O. R.

(2020). The experience of the authentic self: A cooperative inquiry. Journal of Humanistic Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167820952339

46.

Steinmetz

Sezer

Sedikides

(2017). Impression mismanagement: People as inept self-presenters. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(6), Article e12321. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12321

47.

Stratton

S. J.

(2021). Population research: Convenience sampling strategies. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 36(4), 373–374. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X21000649

48.

Tackett

J. L.

Reardon

K. W.

Fast

N. J.

Johnson

Kang

S. K.

Lang

J. W. B.

Oswald

F. L.

(2022). Understanding the leaders of tomorrow: The need to study leadership in adolescence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(4), 829–842. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221118536

49.

Thomaes

Sedikides

van den Bos

Hutteman

Reijntjes

(2017). Happy to be “me?” Authenticity, psychological need satisfaction, and subjective well-being in adolescence. Child Development, 88(4), 1045–1056. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12867

50.

van den Berg

Y. H. M.

Lansu

T. A. M.

Cillessen

A. H. N.

(2020). Preference and popularity as distinct forms of status: A meta-analytic review of 20 years of research. Journal of Adolescence, 84, 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.07.010

51.

Veenstra

Laninga-Wijnen

(2023). The prominence of peer interactions, relationships, and networks in adolescence and early adulthood. In APA handbook of adolescent and young adult development (pp. 225–241). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000298-014

52.

Vijayakumar

Flournoy

J. C.

Mills

K. L.

Cheng

T. W.

Mobasser

Flannery

J. E.

Allen

N. B.

Pfeifer

J. H.

(2020). Getting to know me better: An fMRI study of intimate and superficial self-disclosure to friends during adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(5), 885–899. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000182

53.

Vijayakumar

Pfeifer

J. H.

(2020). Self-disclosure during adolescence: Exploring the means, targets, and types of personal exchanges. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31(SI), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.005

54.

Yuan

Liu

Cui

(2024). Small talk and knowledge sharing: A moderated dual-facilitating pathway model based on interpersonal trust and perceived similarity. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(6), 1538–1565. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2023-0130

55.

Zhang

Pomerantz

E. M.

Qin

Logis

Ryan

A. M.

Wang

(2018). Characteristics of likability, perceived popularity, and admiration in the early adolescent peer system in the United States and China. Developmental Psychology, 54(8), 1568–1581. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000544

56.

Zhao

Heyman

G. D.

(2018). Hiding effort to gain a competitive advantage: Evidence from China. International Journal of Psychology, 53(3), 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12285

57.

Zook

J. M.

Russotti

J. M.

(2012). Academic self-presentation strategies and popularity in middle school. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 33(6), 765–785. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431612467229

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.20 MB