How Does More Niceness Bring More Happiness? The Association Between Niceness,Depression,and Subjective Happiness

Abstract

Behavioral niceness has an important place in maintaining interpersonal relationships. Scale studies are needed to determine the level of niceness that plays a role in individuals’ development of healthy daily interactions with other people. In this study, firstly, the psychometric properties of the Niceness Scale, which consists of six items, were examined in a Turkish sample (N = 404). Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the six-item one-dimensional structure, and item response analysis revealed a high level of discrimination across all items. The relationship of the Niceness Scale with previously validated and reliable scales was examined, and it was found that criterion-related validity was achieved. Furthermore, a network analysis revealed the relationships between the variables more clearly. In the scale’s measurement invariance analysis, consistency was found for both genders. Then, the reliability of the Niceness Scale was proven with different reliability values. In a different Turkish sample (N = 372), it was determined that depression played a statistically significant mediating role in the relationship between niceness and subjective happiness. In conclusion, this study revealed that the one factor and six-item Niceness Scale are valid and reliable in the Turkish sample. Moreover, boosting niceness has been determined to reduce negative situations such as depression and therefore enhance subjective happiness. All these important implications about niceness are discussed in light of the literature.

Keywords

Niceness personality traits psychological distress subjective vitality happiness

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abele

Wojciszke

(Eds.), (2018). Agency and communion in social psychology. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203703663

Akın

Satıcı

S. A.

(2011). Subjective happiness scale: A study of validity and reliability. Sakarya University Journal of Education Faculty, 21(21), 65–77.

Akın

Satıcı

S. A.

Arslan

Akın

Ü.

Kayiş

A. R.

(2012). The validity and the reliability of the Turkish version of the Subjective Vitality Scale (SVS). Paper presented at the 4rd world conference on educational sciences. Elsevier Procedia.

Allison

McCarthy

Wood

C. C.

Darcey

T. M.

Spencer

D. D.

Williamson

P. D.

(1989). Human cortical potentials evoked by stimulation of the median nerve. I. Cytoarchitectonic areas generating short-latency activity. Journal of Neurophysiology, 62(3), 694–710. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1989.62.3.694

Baker

F. B.

(2001). The basics of item response theory. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED458219

Baker

F. B.

Kim

S. H.

(2017). The basics of item response theory using R. Springer.

Baumeister

Leary

(1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497

Bialobrzeska

(2024). Niceness scale: Development and validation of self-reported behavioral niceness measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 218, 112480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112480

Bialobrzeska

Baba

Bedynska

Cichocka

Cislak

Formanowicz

Gocłowska

M. A.

Jakubik

Kozakiewicz

(2023). Keep nice and carry on: Effect of niceness on well-being. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 45(5), 138–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2023.2239410

10.

Bryman

(2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.

11.

Carlson

R. W.

Zaki

(2018). Good deeds gone bad: Lay theories of altruism and selfishness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 75, 36–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.11.005

12.

Cohen

Wills

T. A.

(1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357.

13.

Comrey

A. L.

Lee

H. B.

(1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

14.

Crocker

Canevello

Brown

A. A.

(2017). Social motivation: Costs and benefits of selfishness and otherishness. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 299–325. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044145

15.

Curry

O. S.

Rowland

L. A.

Van Lissa

C. J.

Zlotowitz

McAlaney

Whitehouse

(2018). Happy to help? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of performing acts of kindness on the well-being of the actor. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.02.014

16.

Eisenberg

Spinrad

T. L.

(2014). Multidimensionality of prosocial behavior. Prosocial development: A Multidimensional Approach, 13, 17–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199964772.003.0002

17.

Fisher

J. D.

Nadler

Whitcher-Alagna

(1982). Recipient reactions to aid. Psychological Bulletin, 91(1), 27–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.91.1.27

18.

Gelfand

M. J.

Raver

J. L.

Nishii

Leslie

L. M.

Lun

Lim

B. C.

Duan

Almaliach

Ang

Arnadottir

Aycan

Boehnke

Boski

Cabecinhas

Chan

Chhokar

D'Amato

Subirats Ferrer

Fischlmayr

I. C.

Yamaguchi

(2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332(6033), 1100–1104. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197754

19.

Guilford

J. P.

Fruchter

(1973). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

20.

Harwell

M. R.

(1997). Analyzing the results of Monte Carlo studies in item response theory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57(2), 266–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164497057002006

21.

Hayes

A. F.

(2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Methodology in the social sciences) (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.

22.

Hayes

A. F.

Preacher

K. J.

(2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multi-categorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12028

23.

Helliwell

J. F.

Putnam

R. D.

(2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1435–1446. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1522

24.

Henry

J. D.

Crawford

J. R.

(2005). The short-form version of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS-21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44(Pt 2), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466505X29657

25.

Hoyle

R. H.

Panter

A. T.

(1995). Writing about structural equation models. In Hoyle

R. H.

(Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues & applications (pp. 158–176). Sage.

26.

L. T.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

27.

John

O. P.

Donahue

E. M.

Kentle

R. L.

(1991). The big-five inventory-version 4a and 54. Berkeley Institute of Personality and Social Research, University of California.

28.

Lyubomirsky

Lepper

H. S.

(1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006824100041

29.

Lyubomirsky

Sheldon

K. M.

Schkade

(2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.111

30.

McCrae

R. R.

Costa

P. T.

Jr. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In John

O. P.

Robins

R. W.

Pervin

L. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 159–181). The Guilford Press.

31.

Milić

Skitarelić

Majstorović

Zoranić

Čivljak

Ivanišević

Marendić

Mesarić

Puharić

Neuberg

Čukljek

Racz

Puljak

(2024). Levels of depression, anxiety and subjective happiness among health sciences students in Croatia: A multi-centric cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry, 24(1), 11–50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-05498-5

32.

Nogueira

Teixeira

Pires

Mosca

Teixeira

A. L.

Clemente

Sevivas

(2023). Mental health and coping strategies used by nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic: Scoping review. Journal of Social and Educational Research, 2(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8047187

33.

Nook

E. C.

Ong

D. C.

Morelli

S. A.

Mitchell

J. P.

Zaki

(2016). Prosocial conformity: Prosocial norms generalize across behavior and empathy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(8), 1045–1062. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216649932

34.

Nunnally

J. C.

Bernstein

I. H.

(1994). The assessment of reliability. Psychometric Theory, 3, 248–292.

35.

Pearce

P. L.

Amato

P. R.

(1980). A taxonomy of helping: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43(4), 363–371. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033956

36.

Peetz

Howard

A. L.

(2022). People prefer to diversify across different types of prosocial behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 61(3), 924–939. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12519

37.

Penner

L. A.

Dovidio

J. F.

Piliavin

J. A.

Schroeder

D. A.

(2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365–392. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141

38.

Piff

P. K.

Kraus

M. W.

Côté

Cheng

B. H.

Keltner

(2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 771–784. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020092

39.

Rammstedt

John

O. P.

(2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the big five inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001

40.

Ryan

R. M.

Frederick

(1997). On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 65(3), 529–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00326.x

41.

Sandstrom

G. M.

Dunn

E. W.

(2014). Is efficiency overrated? Minimal social interactions lead to belonging and positive affect. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(4), 437–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613502990

42.

Smalldon

K. W.

Moffat

A. C.

(1973). The calculation of discriminating power for a series of correlated attributes. Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 13(4), 291–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-7368(73)70828-8

43.

Soto

C. J.

John

O. P.

Gosling

S. D.

Potter

(2008). The developmental psychometrics of big five self-reports: Acquiescence, factor structure, coherence, and differentiation from ages 10 to 20. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 718–737. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.718

44.

Tabachnick

B. G.

Fidell

L. S.

(2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.

45.

Thielmann

Spadaro

Balliet

(2020). Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 30–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000217

46.

Türküm

A. S.

Satıcı

S. A.

Yılmaz

M. F.

Kayiş

A. R.

(2016). Turkish version of 10‐Item Big Five Inventory’s psychometric properties. In In European conference on social and behavioral sciences. Paper presented at the X. European Publisher.

47.

Uusitalo-Malmivaara

Lehto

J. E.

(2013). Social factors explaining children’s subjective happiness and depressive symptoms. Social Indicators Research, 111(2), 603–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0022-z

48.

Van Lange

P. A.

Columbus

(2021). Vitamin S: Why is social contact, even with strangers, so important to well-being? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(3), 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211002538

49.

Yılmaz

Boz

Arslan

(2017). The validity and reliability of Depression Stress and Anxiety Scale (DASS 21) Turkish short form. Research of Financial Economic and Social Studies, 2(2), 78–91.