Transfer of Minors to Adult Court in California: Investigating the Legal/Demographic Factors that Make the Difference

Abstract

In light of California’s passage of Proposition 57 in 2016, the present study examined the relationship between legal/demographic variables and decisions to transfer juveniles to the adult court system. Following Prop 57, transfer decisions were entrusted solely with judges and prosecutors could no longer direct file. We used a sample of 106 reports written by forensic psychologists on behalf of the defense examining the life circumstances of minors who allegedly committed serious crimes. Close to two-thirds of minors were kept in the juvenile system whereas the rest were transferred. Utilizing regression analysis, we found that minors with at least one murder charge were more likely to end up in adult court. In regards to race, we detected an overall considerable overrepresentation of Black and Latino juveniles and an underrepresentation of Whites with charges against them but no support of racial bias in transfer decisions in our restricted data set.

Keywords

Juvenile delinquency fitness hearings race

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ball

W. D.

(2011). Tough on crime (on the state’s dime): How violent crime does not drive California counties’ incarceration rates-and why it should. Georgia State University Law Review, 28, 987–1084.

Barton

W. H.

Butts

J. A.

(2008). Building on strength: Positive youth development in juvenile justice programs. Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago.

Bhandal

Nevarez

(2016). Proposition 57: Criminal sentence. Parole. Juvenile criminal proceedings and sentencing. “The Public Safety and Rehabilitation Act of 2016” (Vol. 2016, Article 8). California Initiative Review (CIR).

Bishop

D. M.

Frazier

C. E.

(1988). The influence of race in juvenile justice processing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 25(3), 242–263.

Bronfenbrenner

(1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513–531.

Cauffman

Fine

Mahler

Simmons

(2018). How developmental science influences juvenile justice reform. UC Irvine Law Review, 8(1), 21–40.

Cohn

Taylor

Lopez

M. H.

Gallagher

C. A.

Parker

Maass

K. T.

(2020, May 30). Gun homicide rate down 49% since 1993 peak; public unaware. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2013/05/07/gun-homicide-rate-down-49-since-1993-peak-public-unaware/

Couzans

J. R.

Bigelow

T. A.

(2017). The amendment of the three Strikes sentencing law (Rep.). Judicial Council of California. https://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/Three-Strikes-Amendment-Couzens-Bigelow.pdf

Davis

(2021). Proposition 57: Psychological, developmental, social, and fiscal implications for african American and other incarcerated youth of color in California (Doctoral dissertation. The Chicago School of Professional Psychology).

10.

Eisen

L. B.

(2019). The 1994 crime bill and beyond: How federal funding shapes the criminal justice system. Brennan Center for Justice.

11.

Fader

J. J.

Kurlychek

M. C.

Morgan

K. A.

(2014). The color of juvenile justice: Racial disparities in dispositional decisions. Social Science Research, 44, 126–140.

12.

Fite

P. J.

Wynn

Pardini

D. A.

(2009). Explaining discrepancies in arrest rates between Black and White male juveniles. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(5), 916–927.

13.

Ghisletta

Spini

(2004). An introduction to generalized estimating equations and an application to assess selectivity effects in a longitudinal study on very old individuals. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(4), 421–437.

14.

Goff

P. A.

Jackson

M. C.

Di Leone Culotta

C. M.

DiTomasso

N. A.

(2014). The essence of innocence: Consequences of dehumanizing Black children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(4), 526.

15.

Gramlich

(2020 August 17). 5 facts about crime in the U.S. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/10/17/facts-about-crime-in-the-u-s/

16.

Hanley

J. A.

Negassa

Edwardes

M. D. D.

Forrester

J. E.

(2003). Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: An orientation. American Journal of Epidemiology, 157(4), 364–375.

17.

Hardin

J. W.

Hilbe

J. M.

(2003). Generalized estimating equations. Chapman & Hall/CRC.

18.

Holbrook

M. A.

Dunbar

Miller

M. K.

(2022). Judges’ perceptions of systemic racism in the criminal justice system. Race and Justice.

19.

Jacobson

Heard

Fair

(2017). Prison: Evidence of its use and over-use from around the world.

20.

Jolivette

Swoszowski

N. C.

McDaniel

S. C.

Duchaine

E. L.

(2016). Using positive behavioral interventions and supports to assist in the transition of youth from juvenile justice facilities back to their neighborhood school: An illustrative example. Journal of Correctional Education, 67(2), 9–24.

21.

Kolb

Mychasiuk

Muhammad

Frost

D. O.

Gibb

(2012). Experience and the developing prefrontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(Supplement 2), 17186–17193.

22.

Kovera

M. B.

(2019). Racial disparities in the criminal justice system: Prevalence, causes, and a search for solutions. Journal of Social Issues, 75(4), 1139–1164.

23.

Kupchik

(2006). Judging juveniles: Prosecuting adolescents in adult and juvenile courts (vol. 5). NYU Press.

24.

Lanza-Kaduce

Lane

Bishop

D. M.

Frazier

C. E.

(2005). Juvenile offenders and adult felony recidivism: The impact of transfer. Journal of Crime and Justice, 28(1), 59–77.

25.

Lin

Petersilia

(2014). Follow the money: How California counties are spending their public safety realignment funds. SSRN.

26.

Lofstrom

Bird

Martin

(2016). California’s historic corrections reforms (Rep.). https://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/report/R_916MLR.pdf

27.

Lofstrom

Martin

(2018, October 11). Crime trends in California. https://sbud.senate.ca.gov/sites/sbud.senate.ca.gov/files/FullC/PPIC_Crime_Trends_JTFFinal.pdf

28.

Males

Macallair

(2000). The color of justice: An analysis of juvenile adult court transfers in California.

29.

Mears

D. P.

Cochran

J. C.

Stults

B. J.

Greenman

S. J.

Bhati

A. S.

Greenwald

M. A.

(2014). The “true” juvenile offender: Age effects and juvenile court sanctioning. Criminology, 52(2), 169–194.

30.

Mulvey

E. P.

Schubert

C. A.

(2012). Transfer of juveniles to adult court: Effects of a broad policy in one court. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. https://www.ppic.org/publication/crime-trends-in-california/

31.

Proposition 57 . (2016). https://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/BTB24-5H-1.pdf

32.

Redding

R. E.

Floyd

M. Y.

Hawk

G. L.

(2001). What judges and lawyers think about the testimony of mental health experts: A survey of the courts and bar. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 19(4), 583–594.

33.

Rehavi

M. M.

Starr

S. B.

(2014). Racial disparity in federal criminal sentences. Journal of Political Economy, 122(6), 1320–1354.

34.

Ridolfi

Washburn

Guzman

(2017). Youth prosecuted as adults in California. National Center for Youth Law.

35.

Scott

E. S.

Steinberg

(2008). Rethinking juvenile justice. Harvard University Press.

36.

Semple

J. K.

Woody

W. D.

(2011). Juveniles tried as adults: The age of the juvenile matters. Psychological Reports, 109(1), 301–308.

37.

Senate Bill 382 . (2015). June 29). http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/15-16/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_382_cfa_20150629_100455_asm_comm.html. Retrieved November 03, 2020.

38.

Snyder

S. E.

Duchschere

J. E.

(2022). Revisiting ecological systems theory: Practice implications for juvenile justice youth. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 8(2), 234–245.

39.

Steinberg

(2009). Adolescent development and juvenile justice. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 459–485.

40.

Taylor

(2001). Californias’ proposition 21: A case of juvenile injustice. Southern California Law Review, 75, 983–1019.

41.

Tremper

Thomas

Wagenaar

A. C.

(2010). Measuring law for evaluation research. Evaluation Review, 34(3), 242–266.

42.

Valentine

C. L.

Restivo

Wright

(2019). Prolonged isolation as a predictor of mental health for waived juveniles. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 58(4), 352–369.

43.

Valentine

Block

Eversole

Boxley

Dawson

(2020). Wechsler adult intelligence scale‐IV (WAIS‐IV) (pp. 457–463). The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences: Measurement and Assessment.

44.

Vidal

Mills

Pang

E. W.

Taylor

M. J.

(2012). Response inhibition in adults and teenagers: Spatiotemporal differences in the prefrontal cortex. Brain and Cognition, 79(1), 49–59.

45.

Washburn

Menart

(2019). Unmet promises: Continued violence & neglect in California’s Division of juvenile justice. Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice.

46.

Weinberg

(2017, March 13). California Juvenile Law and proposition 57. https://www.californiacriminaldefenselawyerblog.com/california-juvenile-law-proposition-57/

47.

William

Thaddeus

(2020). The 1994 crime bill: Legacy and lessons-impacts on prison populations. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 32(3), 153–156.

48.

Wooldredge

Frank

Goulette

Travis

III (2015). Is the impact of cumulative disadvantage on sentencing greater for black defendants? Criminology & Public Policy, 14(2), 187–223.

49.

Zane

S. N.

Welsh

B. C.

Drakulich

K. M.

(2016a). Assessing the impact of race on the juvenile waiver decision: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 106–117.

50.

Zane

S. N.

Welsh

B. C.

Mears

D. P.

(2016b). Juvenile transfer and the specific deterrence hypothesis: Systematic review and meta‐analysis. Criminology & Public Policy, 15(3), 901–925.

51.

Zimring

F. E.

Rushin

(2013). Did changes in juvenile sanctions reduce juvenile crime rates; A natural experiment. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 11(1), 57–69.