AndersonA. L.HughesL. A. (2009). Exposure to situations conducive to delinquent behavior: The effects of time use, income, and transportation. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 46, 5–34.
2.
Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002).
3.
BarrettD. E.KatsiyannisA.ZhangD. (2010). Predictors of offense severity, adjudication, incarceration and repeat referrals for juvenile offenders: A multi-cohort replication study. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 261–275.
4.
CaseyB. J.TottenhamN.ListonC.DurstonS. (2005). Imaging the developing brain: What have we learned about cognitive development?Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 104–110.
5.
CauffmanE.ShulmanE. W.SteinbergL.ClausE.BanichM.GrahamS.. (2010). Age differences in affective decision-making as indexed by performance on the Iowa Gambling Task. Developmental Psychology, 46, 193–207.
6.
Commonwealth v. Markle, 380 A.2d 346 (1977).
7.
DavisA. D.SangerD. D.Morris-FrieheM. (1991). Language skills of delinquent and non delinquent males. Journal of Communication Disorders, 24, 251–266.
8.
FaganJ. (2003). Atkins, adolescence, and the maturity heuristic: Rationales for a categorical exemption for juveniles from capital punishment. New Mexico Law Review, 33, 207–254.
9.
FalconerK.CochranJ. R. (1989). Communication skills in male institutionalized juvenile offenders. Rocky Mountain Journal of Communication Disorders, 5, 45–53.
10.
Fare v. Michael C., 442 U.S. 707 (1979).
11.
FergusonA. B.DouglasA. C. (1970). A study of juvenile waiver. San Diego Law Review, 7, 39–54.
12.
Gallegos v. Colorado, 370 U.S. 49 (1962).
13.
GieddJ. N.BlumentalJ.MolloyE.CatellanosF. X. (2001). Brain imaging of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 931, 33–49.
14.
GunterP. L.DennyR. K. (1998). Trends and issues in research regarding academic instruction of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 24, 44–50.
15.
GrissoT. (1980). Juveniles’ capacities to waive Miranda rights: An empirical analysis. California Law Review, 68, 1134–1166.
16.
GrissoT. (1981). Juveniles’ waiver of rights: Legal and psychological competence. New York, NY: Plenum.
17.
GrissoT. (1997). Juvenile competency to stand trial, questions in an era of punitive reform. Criminal Justice, 12, 4–11.
18.
GrissoT. (1998a). Forensic evaluation of juveniles. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
19.
GrissoT. (1998b). Instruments for assessing understanding and appreciation of Miranda rights. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
20.
GrissoT. (2003). Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic.
21.
HammillD. D.BrownV. L.LarsenS. C.WiederholtJ. L. (1987). Test of adolescent language (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
22.
In re Gault et al., 387 U.S. 1 (1967).
23.
In re J. M., 769 A.2d 656, 62 (VT 2001).
24.
Jennifer A. J. v. State of Wisconsin, 94-2735 (Wisc. App. 1995).
25.
LeoneP. E.ZarembaB. A.ChapinM. S.IseliC. (1995). Understanding the overrepresentation of youths with disabilities in juvenile detention. District of Columbia Law Review, 3, 389–401.
26.
LewisT. J.SugaiG. (1999). Effective behavior support: A systems approach to proactive schoolwide management. Focus on Exceptional Children, 31(6), 1–24.
27.
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).
28.
MeyerT. (1999). Testing the validity of confessions and waivers of the self-incrimination privilege in the juvenile courts. Kansas Law Review, 47, 1035–1078.
29.
MorrisK. A.MorrisR. J. (2006). Disability and juvenile delinquency: Issues and trends. Disability and Society, 21, 613-627.
30.
Office of Special Education Programs. (2003). Youth with disabilities in the juvenile justice system. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs.
31.
PausT. (2009). Brain development. In LernerR.SteinbergL. (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 95–115). New York, NY: Wiley.
32.
People v. Lashun H., 672 N.E.2d 331, 332—33 (1996).
33.
PuzzancheraC. (2009, December). Juvenile arrests 2008. OJJDP Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Retrieved from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/228479.pdf
34.
QuinnM. M.RutherfordR. B.LeoneP. E.OsherD. M.PoirerJ. M. (2005). Youth with disabilities in juvenile corrections: A national survey. Exceptional Children, 71, 339–345.
35.
Roberts v. State, 874 So. 2d 1225 (2004).
36.
Roper v. Simmons, 543 U. S. 551 (2005).
37.
S.E. v. Grant County Kentucky Board of Education, 544 F. 3d 633 (2009).
38.
ShawP.GreensteinD.LerchJ.KlasenL.LenrootR.GotgayN.. (2006). Intellectual ability and cortical development in children and adolescents. Nature, 440, 676–679.
39.
SiegelL. (2004, October25). State Supremes mull issue of teenage decision ability: Was expert’s test admissible to mitigate?Connecticut Law Tribune, 30(43), 1.
40.
SnyderH. N. (2003, December). Juvenile arrests 2001. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Retrieved from http://www.ncjrs.gov/html/ojjdp/201370/contents.html
41.
SnyderH. N. (2005, August). Juvenile arrests 2003. OJJDP Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Retrieved from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/209735.pdf
42.
State v. C.W., No. 0304000543, 2003 Del. Fain. Ct. (2003).
43.
State v. Eggers 160 P.3d 1230 (2007).
44.
State v. Ortez, 178 N. C. APP. 236, 631 S.E.2d 188 (2006).
45.
SteinbergL. (2008). A neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28, 78–106.
46.
SteinbergL. (2011). Adolescence (9th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
47.
ThorumA. R. (1980). The Fullerton language test for adolescents: The Fullerton auditory synthesis test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
48.
WeisK. P. (1998). Confessions of mentally retarded juveniles and the validity of Miranda rights waiver. Brandeis Law Journal, 37(117), 126–129.