Flow is an optimal mental state of being completely involved in one’s activities. This correlational study explored an important, but rarely validated performance model in the workplace—flow. Building on the JD-R theory we recognized three key prerequisites of flow—servant leadership, work-life balance, and mindfulness. We analyzed 987 survey responses from two industries (service and manufacturing) in China. The study discovered that servant leadership, mindfulness, and work-life balance correlate with individual flow as key prerequisites. Further we discovered that the relationship between mindfulness and flow is moderated by the industry. Particularly, data from the manufacturing industry showed a positive relationship between mindfulness and flow but a negative relationship among service employees. Implications for performance and applied psychology research, theory, and practice are discussed.
AsakawaK. (2004). Flow experience and autotelic personality in Japanese college students: How do they experience challenges in daily life?Journal of Happiness Studies, 5(2), 123–154. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:johs.0000035915.97836.89
2.
BakkerA. B. (2005). Flow among music teachers and their students: The crossover of peak experiences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(1), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.11.001
3.
BakkerA. B.Van WoerkomM. (2017). Flow at work: A self-determination perspective. Occupational Health Science, 1(1-2), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-017-0003-3
4.
BeauregardT. A.HenryL. C. (2009). Making the link between work-life balance practices and organizational performance. Human Resource Management Review, 19(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.09.001
5.
Bou ReslanF. Y.GarantiZ.EmeagwaliO. L. (2021). The effect of servant leadership on innovative work behavior and employee knowledge sharing in the Latvian ICT sector. Baltic Journal of Management, 16(5), 729–744. https://doi.org/10.1108/bjm-09-2020-0321
6.
BrislinR. W. (1976). Comparative research methodology: Cross-cultural studies. International Journal of Psychology, 11(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207597608247359
7.
BrownK. W.RyanR. M.CreswellJ. D. (2007). Mindfulness: Theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 211–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400701598298
8.
CarpentierJ.MageauG. A.VallerandR. J. (2012). Ruminations and flow: Why do people with a more harmonious passion experience higher well-being?Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(3), 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9276-4
9.
CathcartS.McGregorM.GroundwaterE. (2014). Mindfulness and flow in elite athletes. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 8(2), 119–141. https://doi.org/10.1123/jcsp.2014-0018
10.
CejaL.NavarroJ. (2011). Dynamic patterns of flow in the workplace: Characterizing within‐individual variability using a complexity science approach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(4), 627–651. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.747
11.
ChenC. Y.ChenC. H. V.LiC. I. (2013). The influence of leader’s spiritual values of servant leadership on employee motivational autonomy and eudaemonic well-being. Journal of Religion and Health, 52(2), 418–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-011-9479-3
12.
ConwayJ. M.LanceC. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6
13.
CsíkszentmihályiM. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. Jossey-Bass.
14.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1997). Flow and Creativity. Namta Journal, 22(2), 60–97.
15.
CsíkszentmihályiM. (2000). Beyond boredom and anxiety. Jossey-Bass. (Original work published in 1975).
16.
CsíkszentmihályiM. (2004). Good business: Leadership, flow, and the making of meaning. Penguin Books.
17.
CsíkszentmihályiM.RathundeK. (1993). The measurement of flow in everyday life: Toward a theory of emergent motivation. In JacobsJ. E. (Ed.), Current theory and research in motivation, Vol. 40. Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1992: Developmental perspectives on motivation (pp. 57–97). University of Nebraska Press.
18.
DemeroutiE. (2006). Job characteristics, flow, and performance: The moderating role of conscientiousness. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(3), 266–280. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.11.3.266
19.
DemeroutiE.BakkerA. B.NachreinerF.SchaufeliW. B. (2001). The job demands—resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
20.
de MouraP. J.Jr.BelliniC. G. P. (2020). The measurement of flow and social flow at work: A 30-year systematic review of the literature. Personnel Review, 49(2), 537–570. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-07-2018-0240
21.
DeVellisR. F.ThorpeC. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage publications.
EisenbergerR.JonesJ. R.StinglhamberF.ShanockL.RandallA. T. (2005). Flow experiences at work: For high need achievers alone?Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(7), 755–775. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.337
24.
EvaN.RobinM.SendjayaS.van DierendonckD.LidenR. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004
25.
FullagarC. J.KellowayE. K. (2009). Flow at work: An experience sampling approach. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(3), 595–615. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317908x357903
26.
GerpottF. H.RivkinW.UngerD. (2022). Stop and go, where is my flow? How and when daily aversive morning commutes are negatively related to employees’ motivational states and behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(2), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000899
27.
GreenhausJ. H.PowellG. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 72–92. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.19379625
28.
GreenleafR. K. (1977). Servant leadership. Paulist Press.
29.
HairJ.F.BabinB.J.AndersonR.E.BlackW.C. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning EMEA.
30.
HaleJ. R.FieldsD. L. (2007). Exploring servant leadership across cultures: A study of followers in Ghana and the USA. Leadership, 3(4), 397–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715007082964
31.
HillE. J.HawkinsA. J.FerrisM.WeitzmanM. (2001). Finding an extra day a week: The positive influence of perceived job flexibility on work and family life balance. Family Relations, 50(1), 49–58.
32.
HillA.SchückerL.HagemannN.BabelS. A.MacMahonC.StraußB. (2021). The influence of mindfulness training on running economy and perceived flow under different attentional focus conditions–an intervention study. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 19(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197x.2020.1739110
33.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
34.
HuangH. C.HuangL. S.ChouY. J.TengC. I. (2017). Influence of temperament and character on online gamer loyalty: Perspectives from personality and flow theories. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 398–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.009
35.
IliesR.WagnerD.WilsonK.CejaL.JohnsonM.DeRueS.IlgenD. (2017). Flow at work and basic psychological needs: Effects on well‐being. Applied Psychology, 66(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12075
36.
JamshedS.MajeedN. (2019). Relationship between team culture and team performance through lens of knowledge sharing and team emotional intelligence. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(1), 90–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-04-2018-0265
37.
KaltiainenJ.HakanenJ. (2022). Fostering task and adaptive performance through employee well-being: The role of servant leadership. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 25(1), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/2340944420981599
38.
KarasakalS.AlbayrakT. (2022). How to create flow experience during travel: The role of destination attributes. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 28(3), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/13567667211053386
39.
KhanM. M.MubarikM. S.IslamT.RehmanA.AhmedS. S.KhanE.SohailF. (2022). How servant leadership triggers innovative work behavior: Exploring the sequential mediating role of psychological empowerment and job crafting. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(4), 1037–1055. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-09-2020-0367
40.
KimM. (2022). How can I Be as attractive as a Fitness YouTuber in the era of COVID-19? The impact of digital attributes on flow experience, satisfaction, and behavioral intention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 64, 102778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102778
41.
KimM. J.BonnM.LeeC. K.KimJ. S. (2019). ‘Effects of employees’ personality and attachment on job flow experience relevant to organizational commitment and consumer-oriented behavior. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 41, 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.09.010
42.
KleinA.MoosbruggerH. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65(4), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296338
43.
KockN. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
44.
KudesiaR. S.ReinaC. S. (2019). Does interacting with trustworthy people enhance mindfulness? An experience sampling study of mindfulness in everyday situations. PLoS One, 14(4), Article e0215810. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215810
45.
LaiG. (1995). Work and family roles and psychological well-being in urban China. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36(1), 11–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137285
46.
LapointeÉ.VandenbergheC. (2018). Examination of the relationships between servant leadership, organizational commitment, and voice and antisocial behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(1), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-3002-9
47.
LeeA.LyubovnikovaJ.TianA. W.KnightC. (2020). Servant leadership: A meta‐analytic examination of incremental contribution, moderation, and mediation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 93(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12265
48.
LidenR. C.WayneS. J.MeuserJ. D.HuJ.WuJ.LiaoC. (2015). Servant leadership: Validation of a short form of the SL-28. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(2), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.12.002
49.
LiuS.XinH.ShenL.HeJ.LiuJ. (2019). The influence of individual and team mindfulness on work engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2928. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02928
50.
LiuY.Mayer-KressG.NewellK. M.BrymerR. A. (2010). Individual differences in emotion regulation, emotional experiences at work, and work‐related outcomes: A two‐study investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1515–1538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00627.x
51.
LiuY.WangM.ChangC. H.ShiJ.ZhouL.ShaoR. (2015). Work–family conflict, emotional exhaustion, and displaced aggression toward others: The moderating roles of workplace interpersonal conflict and perceived managerial family support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 793–808. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038387
52.
LumpkinA.AchenR. M. (2018). Explicating the synergies of self‐determination theory, ethical leadership, servant leadership, and emotional intelligence. Journal of Leadership Studies, 12(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21554
53.
MacheS.BernburgM.GronebergD. A.KlappB. F.DanzerG. (2016). Work family conflict in its relations to perceived working situation and work engagement. Work, 53(4), 859–869. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-162257
54.
MartinA. J.JacksonS. A. (2008). Brief approaches to assessing task absorption and enhanced subjective experience: Examining “short” and “core” flow in diverse performance domains. Motivation and Emotion, 32(3), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-008-9094-0
55.
MayC. J.WeykerJ. R.SpengelS. K.FinklerL. J.HendrixS. E. (2014). Tracking longitudinal changes in affect and mindfulness caused by concentration and loving-kindness meditation with hierarchical linear modeling. Mindfulness, 5(3), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-012-0172-8
56.
MiheličK. K.AleksićD. (2017). Dear employer, let me introduce myself”–flow, satisfaction with work–life balance and millennials’ creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 29(4), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2017.1376503
57.
MorgesonF. P.DeRueD. S.KaramE. P. (2010). Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of Management, 36(1), 5–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309347376
58.
MorrisB.JohnstonR. (1987). Dealing with inherent variability: The difference between manufacturing and service?International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 7(4), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb054796
NewmanA.SchwarzG.CooperB.SendjayaS. (2017). How servant leadership influences organizational citizenship behavior: The roles of LMX, empowerment, and proactive personality. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2827-6
61.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
62.
PrajogoD. I. (2005). The comparative analysis of TQM practices and quality performance between manufacturing and service firms. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 16(3), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230510601378
63.
QiuS.DooleyL. M.XieL. (2020). How servant leadership and self-efficacy interact to affect service quality in the hospitality industry: A polynomial regression with response surface analysis. Tourism Management, 78(4), 104051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104051
64.
ReidD. (2011). Mindfulness and flow in occupational engagement: Presence in doing. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 78(1), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.2182/cjot.2011.78.1.7
65.
RuppelC. P.GongB.TworogerL. C. (2013). Using communication choices as a boundary-management strategy: How choices of communication media affect the work–life balance of teleworkers in a global virtual team. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 27(4), 436–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651913490941
66.
RussellR. F. (2001). The role of values in servant leadership. The Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 22(2), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730110382631
67.
RussoM.ShteigmanA.CarmeliA. (2016). Workplace and family support and work–life balance: Implications for individual psychological availability and energy at work. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(2), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1025424
68.
SelartM.ScheiV.LinesR.NesseS. (2020). Can mindfulness be helpful in team decision‐making? A framework for understanding how to mitigate false consensus. European Management Review, 17(4), 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12415
69.
SendjayaS.SarrosJ. C.SantoraJ. C. (2008). Defining and measuring servant leadership behaviour in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 45(2), 402–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00761.x
70.
ShapiroS. L.CarlsonL. E.AstinJ. A.FreedmanB. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 373–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20237
71.
SheldonK. M.PrenticeM.HalusicM. (2015). The experiential incompatibility of mindfulness and flow absorption. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(3), 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614555028
72.
ShihH. A.SusantoE. (2011). Is innovative behavior really good for the firm? Innovative work behavior, conflict with coworkers and turnover intention: Moderating roles of perceived distributive fairness. International Journal of Conflict Management, 22(2), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/10444061111126666
73.
SinghJ.GoolsbyJ. R.RhoadsG. K. (1994). Behavioral and psychological consequences of boundary spanning burnout for customer service representatives. Journal of Service Research, 31(4), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379403100409
74.
SinnottJ.HiltonS.WoodM.DouglasD. (2020). Relating flow, mindfulness, cognitive flexibility, and postformal thought: Two studies. Journal of Adult Development, 27(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-018-9320-2
75.
SiuO. L.LuJ. F.BroughP.LuC. Q.BakkerA. B.KalliathT.O'DriscollM.PhillipsD. R.ChenW. -q.LoD.SitC.ShiK. (2010). Role resources and work–family enrichment: The role of work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(3), 470–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.06.007
76.
SunW.XuA.ShangY. (2014). Transformational leadership, team climate, and team performance within the NPD team: Evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-012-9327-3
77.
TaserD.AydinE.TorgalozA. O.RofcaninY. (2022). An examination of remote e-working and flow experience: The role of technostress and loneliness. Computers in Human Behavior, 127(14), 107020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107020
78.
van den HoutJ. J.DavisO. C. (2019). Team flow: The psychology of optimal collaboration. Springer Nature.
79.
VogusT. J.SutcliffeK. M. (2012). Organizational mindfulness and mindful organizing: A reconciliation and path forward. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 11(4), 722–735. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2011.0002c
80.
WepferA. G.AllenT. D.BrauchliR.JennyG. J.BauerG. F. (2018). Work-life boundaries and well-being: Does work-to-life integration impair well-being through lack of recovery?Journal of Business and Psychology, 33(6), 727–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9520-y
81.
WhiteM.HillS.McGovernP.MillsC.SmeatonD. (2003). High‐performance” management practices, working hours and work–life balance. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41(2), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8543.00268
82.
WongA.LiuY.WangX.TjosvoldD. (2018). Servant leadership for team conflict management, co‐ordination, and customer relationships. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 56(2), 238–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12135
83.
WrightJ.ChurgA.StewG. (2006). Challenge-skills and mindfulness: An exploration of the conundrum of flow process. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 26(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/153944920602600104
84.
XieL. (2020). The impact of servant leadership and transformational leadership on learning organization: A comparative analysis. The Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(2), 220–236. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-04-2019-0148
85.
XieL. (2021). Flow in work teams: The role of emotional regulation, voice, and team mindfulness. Current Psychology, 41(2), 7867–7877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01179-0
XieL.QiuS.BianX. (2021). The curvilinear relationship between servant leadership and work-family conflict: The moderating role of age in Chinese female workers. Industrial and Commercial Training, 53(3), 294–309. https://doi.10.1108/ICT-12-2020-0114
88.
XuA. J.WangL. (2020). How and when servant leaders enable collective thriving: The role of team–member exchange and political climate. British Journal of Management, 31(2), 274–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12358
89.
YagilD.OrenR. (2021). Servant leadership, engagement, and employee outcomes: The moderating roles of proactivity and job autonomy. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 37(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2021a1
90.
YangJ.GuJ.LiuH. (2019). Servant leadership and employee creativity: The roles of psychological empowerment and work–family conflict. Current Psychology, 38(6), 1417–1427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-0161-3
91.
YuL.Zellmer-BruhnM. (2018). Introducing team mindfulness and considering its safeguard role against conflict transformation and social undermining. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 324–347. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0094
92.
ZhouZ.VerburgR. (2020). Open for business: The impact of creative team environment and innovative behaviour in technology-based start-ups. International Small Business Journal, 38(4), 318–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242619892793
