Favoring Inequalities and Mind-Reading: Social Dominance Orientation Relates to Poor Mentalizing

Abstract

Although studies have so far investigated social dominance orientation (SDO) in relation to its association with prejudice and discrimination toward outgroups, it is not known whether SDO’s link with poor intergroup relations might be underlined by specific socio-cognitive factors such as reduced mind-reading motivation (MRM) and poor mind-reading performance. The present study tested whether endorsement of SDO is associated with decreased MRM and mind-reading accuracy toward both ingroup and outgroup targets. We randomly assigned one hundred and 20 Turkish university students (M_age = 22.02) into two target groups for mind-reading, Turkish ingroup (N = 60) and Syrian outgroup (N = 60), and asked them to infer minds of either ingroup or outgroup members depending on their target group. Participants also reported their level of MRM and SDO through questionnaires. When the target was a Turkish ingroup member, SDO negatively and directly predicted mind-reading, when the target was an outgroup member, however, higher SDO indirectly predicted lower mind-reading through reduced MRM. These results pointed that favoring intergroup hierarchies relates to poor understanding of others’ mental states although the mechanism of the relation changes depending on the group membership of the target.

Keywords

social dominance orientation mind-reading mind-reading motivation prejudice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akrami

Ekehammar

Bergh

Dahlstrand

Malmsten

(2009). Prejudice: The person in the situation. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(5), 890–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.04.007

Carpenter

J. M.

Green

M. C.

Vacharkulksemsuk

(2016). Beyond perspective-taking: Mind-reading motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 40(3), 358–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9544-z

Cornelis

Van Hiel

(2006). The impact of cognitive styles on authoritarianism based conservatism and racism. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2801_4

Devine

R. T.

Hughes

(2014). Relations between false belief understanding and executive function in early childhood: A meta‐analysis. Child Development, 85(5), 1777–1794. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12237

Duckitt

Sibley

C. G.

(2007). Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21(2), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.614

Ekerim-Akbulut

Selçuk

Slaughter

Hunter

J. A.

Ruffman

(2020). In two minds: Similarity, threat, and prejudice contribute to worse mindreading of outgroups compared with an ingroup. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 51(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022119883699 https://doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1018

Erdogan

M. M.

(2014). Syrian people in Turkey: Social acceptance and harmony research. Hacettepe University Migration and Politics Research Center.

Imuta

Henry

J. D.

Slaughter

Selcuk

Ruffman

(2016). Theory of mind and prosocial behavior in childhood: A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 52(8), 1192–1205. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000140

Israelashvili

Sauter

Fischer

(2019). How well can we assess our ability to understand others’ feelings? Beliefs about taking others’ perspectives and actual understanding of others’ emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2475. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02475

10.

Nicol

A. A.

Rounding

(2013). Alienation and empathy as mediators of the relation between social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism and expressions of racism and sexism. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(3), 294–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.03.009

11.

Perez-Zapata

Slaughter

Henry

J. D.

(2016). Cultural effects on mindreading. Cognition, 146, 410–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.018

12.

Pratto

Sidanius

Stallworth

L. M.

Malle

B. F.

(1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741

13.

Roy

Neumann

C. S.

Jones

D. N.

Gari

Šram

(2021). Psychopathic propensities contribute to social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism in predicting prejudicial attitudes in a large European sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 168(4), 110355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110355

14.

Ruffman

Hill

Turunc

Park

Hayhurst

Kang

Selçuk

Regenbrecht

Philipp

M. C.

Hunter

J. A.

Hunter

J. A.

(2020). RWAc and SDOc: The measurement of right‐wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation in childhood. Social Development, 29(4), 1194–1214. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12438

15.

Samson

Apperly

I. A.

(2010). There is more to mind reading than having theory of mind concepts: New directions in theory of mind research. Infant and Child Development, 19(5), 443–454. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.678

16.

Savitsky

Keysar

Epley

Carter

Swanson

(2011). The closeness-communication bias: Increased egocentrism among friends versus strangers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 269–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.09.005

17.

Sidanius

Pratto

(2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175043

18.

Simpson

A. J.

Todd

A. R.

(2017). Intergroup visual perspective-taking: Shared group membership impairs self-perspective inhibition but may facilitate perspective calculation. Cognition, 166, 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.003

19.

Van Hiel

Pandelaere

Duriez

(2004). The impact of need for closure on conservative beliefs and racism: Differential mediation by authoritarian submission and authoritarian dominance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(7), 824–837. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264333