With the enhancement of leisure consciousness, people pay increasing attention to leisure. When individuals perceive that the training, affect and skills obtained from work have a positive effect on their leisure, will they take the initiative to engage in actions that are beneficial for the development of the enterprise? Previous studies have not explored this. Therefore, in view of this shortcoming, this study explored the relationship between work-leisure facilitation (WLF) and employee voice behaviour based on resource conservation theory, as well as the dual mediation path role of work vigour and organizational identification in this relationship. In addition, this study explored the influence of leader-member exchange (LMX) on the dual mediation path. In this study, 110 employees were sampled for five consecutive working days, and a multilevel model was constructed for data analysis. The results showed that WLF was significantly positively correlated with employee voice behaviour and that both work vigour and organizational identification played significant mediating roles. LMX shows differences in the moderation of the dual mediation path. Specifically, LMX significantly moderated the indirect effect of WLF on voice behaviour through work vigour, but it did not moderate the relationship between WLF and organizational identification. This study not only reveals the relationship between WLF and voice behaviour but also make suggestions to management for improving employee voice behaviour.
AlikajA.NingW.WuB. (2021). Proactive personality and creative behavior: Examining the role of thriving at work and high-involvement HR practices. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36(5), 857–869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09704-5
2.
BakkerA. B. (2011). An evidence-based model of work engagement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(4), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411414534
3.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE.Sanz-VergelA. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235
4.
BergeronD. M.ThompsonP. S. (2020). Speaking up at work: The role of perceived organizational support in explaining the relationship between perceptions of organizational politics and voice Behavior. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 56(2), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886319900332
5.
BernerthJ. B.WalkerH. J.HarrisS. G. (2016). Rethinking the benefits and pitfalls of leader–member exchange: A reciprocity versus self-protection perspective. Human Relations, 69(3), 661–684. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715594214
6.
ChamberlinM.NewtonD. W.LepineJ. A. (2017). A meta-analysis of voice and its promotive and prohibitive forms: Identification of key associations, distinctions, and future research directions. Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 11–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12185
7.
ChangW.BusserJ. A. (2020). Hospitality career retention: The role of contextual factors and thriving at work. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(1), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-10-2018-0831
8.
ChenS.-C.ChiangY.-H.HuangY.-J. (2017). Exploring the psychological mechanisms linking work-related factors with work–family conflict and work–family facilitation among Taiwanese nurses. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(4), 581–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1118140
9.
ChengJ.-W.LuK.-M.ChangY.-Y.JohnstoneS. (2013). Voice behavior and work engagement: The moderating role of supervisor-attributed motives. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 51(1), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7941.2012.00030.x
10.
ChengT.MaunoS.LeeC. (2014). Do job control, support, and optimism help job insecure employees? A three-wave study of buffering effects on job satisfaction, vigor and work-family enrichment. Social Indicators Research, 118(3), 1269–1291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0467-8
11.
ChughtaiA. A. (2016). Servant leadership and follower outcomes: Mediating effects of organizational identification and psychological safety. The Journal of Psychology, 150(7), 866–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2016.1170657
12.
CiampaV.SirowatkaM.SchuhS. C.FraccaroliF.van DickR. (2021). Ambivalent identification as a moderator of the link between organizational identification and counterproductive work behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 169(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04262-0
13.
ClintonM. E.ConwayN.SturgesJ. (2017). It's tough hanging-up a call”: The relationships between calling and work hours, psychological detachment, sleep quality, and morning vigor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000025
14.
CrantJ. M.KimT.-Y.WangJ. (2011). Dispositional antecedents of demonstration and usefulness of voice behavior. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(3), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9197-y
15.
ElahiN. S.AbidG.AryaB.FarooqiS. (2020). Workplace behavioral antecedents of job performance: Mediating role of thriving. The Service Industries Journal, 40(11-12), 755–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2019.1638369
16.
EllisA. M.BauerT. N.ErdoganB.TruxilloD. M. (2019). Daily perceptions of relationship quality with leaders: Implications for follower well-being. Work & Stress, 33(2), 119–136. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2018.1445670
17.
GaoM.ChenC.-C.HuangY.-C.LinY.-H. (2019). Work and leisure in Taiwan: Examining the antecedents and consequences of work-leisure conflicts. Leisure Studies, 38(1), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2018.1512646
18.
GlavasA.GodwinL. N. (2013). Is the perception of “Goodness” good enough? Exploring the relationship between perceived corporate social responsibility and employee organizational identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1323-5
19.
GohZ.EvaN.KiazadK.JackG. A.De CieriH.SpreitzerG. M. (2021). An integrative multilevel review of thriving at work: Assessing progress and promise. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(2), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2571
20.
GraenG. B.Uhl-BienM. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
21.
GuanX.FrenkelS. (2021). Supervisor‐subordinate guanxi and employee thriving at work: The key role of relation generated resources. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 59(3), 400–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12273
22.
GutermannD.Lehmann-WillenbrockN.BoerD.BornM.VoelpelS. C. (2017). How leaders affect followers’ work engagement and performance: Integrating leader−member exchange and crossover theory. British Journal of Management, 28(2), 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12214
23.
HalbeslebenJ. R. B.HarveyJ.BolinoM. C. (2009). Too engaged? A conservation of resources view of the relationship between work engagement and work interference with family. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1452–1465. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017595
24.
HalbeslebenJ. R. B.NeveuJ.-P.Paustian-UnderdahlS. C.WestmanM. (2014). Getting to the “COR. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1334–1364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527130
25.
HobfollS. E.HalbeslebenJ.NeveuJ.-P.WestmanM. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
26.
JonesC.VolpeE. H. (2011). Organizational identification: Extending our understanding of social identities through social networks. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(3), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.694
27.
KatrinliA.AtabayG.GunayG.GuneriB. (2008). Leader-member exchange, organizational identification and the mediating role of job involvement for nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 64(4), 354–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04809.x
28.
KimM.-H.YiY.-J. (2019). Impact of leader-member-exchange and team-member-exchange on nurses’ job satisfaction and turnover intention. International Nursing Review, 66(2), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12491
LamL. W.LiuY.LoiR. (2016). Looking intra-organizationally for identity cues: Whether perceived organizational support shapes employees’ organizational identification. Human Relations, 69(2), 345–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715584689
31.
LapierreL. M.LiY.KwanH. K.GreenhausJ. H.DiRenzoM. S.ShaoP. (2018). A meta-analysis of the antecedents of work-family enrichment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(4), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2234
LiangY.-W. (2020). Consequences of work–leisure facilitation from tour leaders’/guides’ perspectives: Self-efficacy and satisfaction. Journal of Leisure Research, 51(2), 206–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2019.1670586
34.
LiangY.-W.LiouY.-C. (2022). Relationships between social support and satisfaction- moderating role of facilitation. Leisure Studies, 41(2), 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2021.1948597
35.
LinS. H. J.JohnsonR. E. (2015). A suggestion to improve a day keeps your depletion away: Examining promotive and prohibitive voice behaviors within a regulatory focus and ego depletion framework. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(5), 1381–1397. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000018
36.
LinX.LamL. W.ZhangL. L. (2020). The curvilinear relationship between job satisfaction and employee voice: Speaking up for the organization and the self. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37(2), 587–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9622-8
37.
LittleL. M.NelsonD. L.WallaceJ. C.JohnsonP. D. (2011). Integrating attachment style, vigor at work, and extra-role performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(3), 464–484. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.709
38.
LiuF.ChowI. H.-S.GongY.HuangM. (2020). Affiliative and aggressive humor in leadership and their effects on employee voice: A serial mediation model. Review of Managerial Science, 14(6), 1321–1339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00334-7
39.
LoiR.ChanK. W.LamL. W. (2014). Leader-member exchange, organizational identification, and job satisfaction: A social identity perspective. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(1), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12028
40.
MaelF.AshforthB. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202
41.
MarstandA. F.EpitropakiO.van KnippenbergD.MartinR. (2021). Leader and organizational identification and organizational citizenship behaviors: Examining cross-lagged relationships and the moderating role of collective identity orientation. Human Relations, 74(10), 1716–1745. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726720938118
42.
Moazami-GoodarziA.NurmiJ.-E.MaunoS.RantanenJ. (2015). Cross-lagged relations between work–family enrichment, vigor at work, and core self-evaluations: A three-wave study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(3), 473–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9376-3
43.
MowbrayP. K.WilkinsonA.TseH. H. M. (2021). High-performance work systems and employee voice behaviour: An integrated model and research agenda. Personnel Review, 50(6), 1530–1543. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-12-2019-0692
44.
NgK.-Y.Van DyneL.AngS. (2019). Speaking out and speaking up in multicultural settings: A two-study examination of cultural intelligence and voice behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 151(1), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.10.005
45.
NgT. W. H.FeldmanD. C. (2012). Employee voice behavior: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 216–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.754
46.
NiuW.YuanQ.QianS.LiuZ. (2018). Authentic leadership and employee job behaviors: The mediating role of relational and organizational identification and the moderating role of LMX. Current Psychology, 37(4), 982–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9937-0
47.
PorathC.SpreitzerG.GibsonC.GarnettF. G. (2011). Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 250–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.756
48.
PreacherK. J.ZhangZ.ZyphurM. J. (2016). Multilevel structural equation models for assessing moderation within and across levels of analysis. Psychological Methods, 21(2), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000052
49.
RaghuramS. (2011). Organizational identification among young software professionals in India. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(18), 3913–3928. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.561224
50.
SaeedB. B.AfsarB.CheemaS.JavedF. (2019). Leader-member exchange and innovative work behavior. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(1), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-11-2017-0158
51.
SchmittA.BelschakF. D.Den HartogD. N. (2017). Feeling vital after a good night’s sleep: The interplay of energetic resources and self-efficacy for daily proactivity. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(4), 443–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000041
52.
ShahjehanA.ShahS. I.AfsarB. (2022). The moderating effect of defensive voice belief on the curvilinear relationship between organizational identification and voice behavior in the hospitality industry. Current Psychology, 41(4), 2418–2430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00768-3
53.
ShengX.ZhouH. (2021). The effect of decent work on voice behavior: The mediating role of thriving at work and the moderating role of proactive personality. Current Psychology, 41(12), 8524–8537, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01173-6
54.
SherfE. N.ParkeM. R.IsaakyanS. (2021). Distinguishing voice and silence at work: Unique relationships with perceived impact, psychological safety, and burnout. Academy of Management Journal, 64(1), 114–148. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.1428
55.
ShiW.WangF.LiX. (2021). Depletion effect of work-leisure conflict: A daily diary study. Social Indicators Research, 158(1), 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02710-x
56.
SlussD. M.KlimchakM.HolmesJ. J. (2008). Perceived organizational support as a mediator between relational exchange and organizational identification. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(3), 457–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.09.001
57.
SpanouliA.HofmansJ. (2020). A Resource based perspective on organizational citizenship and counterproductive work behavior: The role of vitality and core self evaluations. Applied Psychology, 70(4), 1435–1462. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12281
58.
StollbergerJ.Las HerasM.RofcaninY. (2022). Sharing is caring: The role of compassionate love for sharing coworker work-family support at home to promote partners' creativity at work. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(10), 1824–1842, https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000985
59.
Ten BrummelhuisL. L.BakkerA. B. (2012). A resource perspective on the work–home interface: The work–home resources model. The American Psychologist, 67(7), 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027974
60.
TremblayM.GaudetM.-C.Parent-RocheleauX. (2021). How and when relative leader–member exchange (RLMX) invigorates attendance at work within a context of LMX differentiation. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 28(2), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051821989289
Van DyneL.LePineJ. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.5465/256902
63.
Van SteenbergenE. F.EllemersN.MooijaartA. (2007). How work and family can facilitate each other: Distinct types of work-family facilitation and outcomes for women and men. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(3), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.279
64.
WalumbwaF. O.MayerD. M.WangP.WangH.WorkmanK.ChristensenA. L. (2011). Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader–member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.11.002
65.
WangF.ShiW. (2021). Inclusive leadership and pro-social rule breaking: The role of psychological safety, leadership identification and leader-member exchange. Psychological Reports, 124(5), 2155–2179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294120953558
66.
WeissM.MorrisonE. W. (2019). Speaking up and moving up: How voice can enhance employees’ social status. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2262
67.
WhitingS. W.MaynesT. D.PodsakoffN. P.PodsakoffP. M. (2012). Effects of message, source, and context on evaluations of employee voice behavior. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 159–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024871
XuA. J.LoiR.ChowC. W. C. (2019). What threatens retail employees’ thriving at work under leader-member exchange? The role of store spatial crowding and team negative affective tone. Human Resource Management, 58(4), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21959
