Warmer Individuals Get More Help: The Influence of Stereotypes and Empathy on Moral Decision-Making

Abstract

The processing of moral decision-making is influenced by both cognitive and emotional systems, making it worth exploring exactly how each plays a role in the process of individual moral decision-making. In this study, 160 participants with either high or low empathy traits (80 each, as determined by the Interpersonal Response Index Inventory) completed a moral decision-making task regarding whether to help others (stereotyped as high warmth-high competence, high warmth-low competence, low warmth-high competence, low warmth-low competence) at the expense of themselves. The intent was to explore the influence of stereotypes and empathy traits on moral decision-making. The results showed that: (1) participants were more willing to help individuals with high warmth than those with high competence, showing a clear “primacy of warmth effect”; (2) this effect was weakened in participants with high empathy traits in comparison to those with low empathy traits, as their willingness to help individuals with low warmth was significantly higher than that of participants with low empathy traits. The results suggest that stereotypes about warmth and competence moderate altruistic tendencies in moral decision-making and that this moderation is more pronounced in individuals with low empathy traits than in those with high empathy traits.

Keywords

stereotypes warmth and competence empathy trait moral decision-making helpful dilemmas

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abele

A. E.

Nicole

Kim

Eva

Aleksandra

Duan

(2016). Facets of the fundamental content dimensions: Agency with competence and assertiveness—communion with warmth and morality. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1810. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01810

Abele

A. E.

Wojciszke

(2014). Communal and agentic content in social cognition: A dual perspective model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 195–255.

Aquino

Reed

II . (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423

Ayal

Hochman

(2009). Ignorance or integration: The cognitive processes underlying choice behavior. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22(4), 455–474. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.642

Baleva

M. V.

Gasimova

V. A.

Kovaleva

G. V.

(2018). Cognitive mechanisms of stereotyping the other. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 39(3), 57–69.

Baron-Cohen

(2002). The extreme male brain theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(6), 248–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(02)01904-6

Baron-Cohen

(2005). The essential difference: The male and female brain. Phi Kappa Phi Forum, 85(1), 23–26.

Baron-Cohen

(2010). Empathizing, systemizing, and the extreme male brain theory of autism. Progress in Brain Research, 186, 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53630-3.00011-7

Batson

C. D.

Ahmad

N. Y.

(2009). Empathy-induced altruism: A threat to the collective good. Advances in Group Processes, 26, 1–23.

10.

Batson

C. D.

Early

Salvarani

(1997). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imaging how you would feel. Personality Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(7), 751–758. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297237008

11.

Bernhardt

B. C.

Klimecki

O. M.

Leiberg

Singer

(2014). Structural covariance networks of the dorsal anterior insula predict females’ individual differences in empathic responding. Cerebral Cortex, 24(8), 2189–2198. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht072

12.

Bin

Taotao

Fangfang

Yuxian

(2015). The big two model in social cognition. Journal of Psychological Science, 38(4), 1019–1023. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2015.04.033

13.

Bin

Fangfang

Yang

Taotao

(2018). Contextual evolution of the relationship between enthusiasm and competence in intergroup evaluation: The role of evaluation intentions and outcomes. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 50(10), 114–130.

14.

Bin

Fangfang

Xiao

(2020). Contextual influence on “the primacy of warmth effect”: Evidence from peer nomination test. Journal of Psychological Science, 43(6), 1384–1390. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20200615

15.

Blair

R. J. R.

(2005). Responding to the emotions of others: Dissociating forms of empathy through the study of typical and psychiatric populations. Conscious Cogn, 14(4), 698–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2005.06.004

16.

Bodenhausen

G. V.

(1988). Stereotypic biases in social decision making and memory: Testing process models of stereotype use. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 55(5), 726–737. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.5.726

17.

Cecchetto

Korb

Rumiati

R. I.

Aiello

(2018). Emotional reactions in moral decision-making are influenced by empathy and alexithymia. Social Neuroscience, 13(2), 226–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2017.1288656

18.

Chen

Wen

Xue

(2014). The influence of moral self-regulation on prosocial tendency and its age effect. China Journal of Health Psychology, 22(8), 1240–1242. https://10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2014.08.047

19.

Cikara

Farnsworth

R. A.

Harris

L. T.

Fiske

S. T.

(2010). On the wrong side of the trolley track: Neural correlates of relative social valuation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5(4), 404–413. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq011

20.

Cislak

Wojciszke

(2010). Agency and communion are inferred from actions serving interests of self or others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(7), 1103–1110. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.554

21.

Cuddy

A. J. C.

Fiske

S. T.

Glick

(2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 92(4), 631–648. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.631

22.

Cushman

Young

(2011). Patterns of moral judgment derive from nonmoral psychological representations. Cognitive Science, 35(6), 1052–1075. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01167.x

23.

Davis

M. H.

(1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 10(85), 46–61.

24.

Davis

M. H.

(1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113

25.

Decety

(2021). Why empathy is not a reliable source of information in moral decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(5), 425–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211031943

26.

Decety

Bartal

I. B. A.

Uzefovsky

Knafo-Noam

(2016). Empathy as a driver of prosocial behaviour: Highly conserved neurobehavioural mechanisms across species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1686), 20150077. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0077

27.

Decety

Cowell

J. M.

(2014). The complex relation between morality and empathy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(7), 337–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.008

28.

Decety

Svetlova

(2012). Putting together phylogenetic and ontogenetic perspectives on empathy. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2011.05.003

29.

Dijksterhuis

Nordgren

L. F.

(2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00007.x

30.

Duan

Lei

Shuliang

Cuiying

Fan

Huashan

Liu

(2012). The role of mental states and causality in moral judgment: Examination on dual-process theory of moral judgment. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44(12), 1607–1617. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1041.2012.01607

31.

Durante

Fiske

S. T.

Gelfand

M. J.

Crippa

Suttora

Stillwell

Carlsson

Bye

H. H.

Bjorklund

Dagher

Geller

Larsen

C. A.

Latif

A. H. A.

Mahonen

T. A.

Jasinskaja-Lahti

Teymoori

(2017a). Ambivalent stereotypes link to peace, conflict, and inequality across 38 nations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(4), 669–674. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1611874114

32.

Durante

Tablante

C. B.

Fiske

S. T. J.

(2017b). Poor but warm, rich but cold (and competent): Social classes in the stereotype content model. Journal of Social Issues, 73(1), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12208

33.

Dutton

Dunkel

(2019). For tomorrow we die?” Testing the accuracy of stereotypes about atheists and agnostics. Mankind Quarterly, 60(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.46469/mq.2019.60.1.5

34.

Dziobek

Rogers

Fleck

Bahnemann

Heekeren

H. R.

Wolf

O. T.

Convit

(2008). Dissociation of cognitive and emotional empathy in adults with asperger syndrome using the multifaceted empathy test (MET). Journal of Autism Developmental Disorders, 38(3), 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0486-x

35.

Eagly

A. H.

Ashmore

R. D.

Makhijani

M. G.

Longo

L. C.

(1991). What is beautiful is good, but: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109

36.

Emswiller

Deaux

Willits

J. E.

(1971). Similarity, sex, and requests for small favors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1(3), 284–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1971.tb00367.x

37.

Fabre

E. E.

Causse

Pesciarelli

Cacciari

(2015). Sex and the money - how gender stereotypes modulate economic decision-making: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 75, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.06.013

38.

Fiske

S. T.

(2018). Stereotype content: Warmth and competence endure. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(2), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417738825

39.

Fiske

S. T.

Cuddy

Glick

(2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005

40.

Fiske

S. T.

Cuddy

A. J. C.

Glick

J. J.

(2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878

41.

Ganley

C. M.

Mingle

L. A.

Ryan

A. M.

Ryan

Vasilyeva

Perry

(2013). An examination of stereotype threat effects on girls’ mathematics performance. Developmental Psychology, 49(10), 1886–1897. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031412

42.

Gladstein

G. A.

(1987). The role of empathy in counseling: Theoretical considerations. Springer.

43.

Gleichgerrcht

Young

(2013). Low levels of empathic concern predict utilitarian moral judgment. Plos One, 8(4), e60418. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060418

44.

Green

J. D.

Morelli

S. A.

Lowenberg

Nystrom

L. E.

Cohen

J. D.

(2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment - ScienceDirect. Cognition, 107(3), 1144–1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.004

45.

Greene

J. D.

(2007). Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual–process theory of moral judgment explains. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(8), 322–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.004

46.

Greene

J. D.

Sommerville

R. B.

Nystrom

L. E.

Darley

J. M.

Cohen

J. D.

(2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062872

47.

Haidt

(2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814

48.

Hamilton

D. L.

Trolier

T. K.

(1986). Stereotypes and stereotyping: An overview of the cognitive approach. In Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 127–163). Academic Press.

49.

Harris

L. T.

Fiske

S. T.

(2006). Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: Neuroimaging responses to extreme out-groups. Psychological Science, 17(10), 847–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01793.x

50.

Hilton

J. L.

Von

H. W.

(1996). Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 47(250), 237–271. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.237

51.

Jussim

Crawford

J. T.

Anglin

S. M.

Chambers

J. R.

Stevens

S. T.

Cohen

(2016). Stereotype accuracy: One of the largest and most replicable effects in all of social psychology. In Nelson

(Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (2nd edition, pp. 31–63). Psychology Press.

52.

Jussim

Crawford

J. T.

Rubinstein

R. S.

(2015). Stereotype (in) accuracy in perceptions of groups and individuals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(6), 490–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415605257

53.

Kardos

Leidner

Pléh

Soltész

Unoka

(2017). Empathic people have more friends: Empathic abilities predict social network size and position in social network predicts empathic efforts. Social Networks, 50, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.01.004

54.

Kervyn

Fiske

S. T.

Yzerbyt

V. Y. J. E.

(2014). Integrating the stereotype content model (warmth and competence) and the Osgood semantic differential (evaluation, potency, and activity). European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(7), 673–681. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1978

55.

Kliemann

Young

Scholz

Saxe

(2008). The influence of prior record on moral judgment. Neuropsychologia, 46(12), 2949–2957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.06.010

56.

Koch

A. J.

D’Mello

S. D.

Sackett

P. R.

(2015). A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 128–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036734

57.

Lamm

Decety

Singer

(2011). Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain. Neuroimage, 54(3), 2492–2502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.014

58.

Liang

Tan

Zhan

. (2020). Selfish or altruistic? The influence of thinking styles and stereotypes on moral decision-making. Personality Individual Differences, 171(3), 110465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110465

59.

Lockwood

P. L.

(2016). The anatomy of empathy: Vicarious experience and disorders of social cognition. Behavioral Brain Research, 311, 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2016.05.048

60.

Hilbert

(2012). Toward a synthesis of cognitive biases: How noisy information processing can bias human decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 211–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025940

61.

McAllister

(2016). Candidates and voting choice (pp. 1–18). Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.

62.

Michniewicz

K. S.

Vandello

J. A.

(2014). The attractive underdog: When disadvantage bolsters attractiveness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(7), 942–952. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407513477629

63.

Millet

Aydinli

(2019). Cognitive reflection, 2D:4D and social value orientation. Plos One, 14(2), 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212767

64.

Neuberg

S. L.

Newsom

J. T.

(1993). Personal need for structure: Individual differences in the desire for simple structure. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 65(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.113

65.

Paciello

Fida

Cerniglia

Tramontano

Cole

(2013). High cost helping scenario: The role of empathy, prosocial reasoning and moral disengagement on helping behavior. Personality Individual Differences, 55(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.004

66.

Parkinson

Wheatley

(2014). Relating anatomical and social connectivity: White matter microstructure predicts emotional empathy. Cerebral Cortex, 24(3), 614–625. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs347

67.

Pfattheicher

S. N. L.

Bohm

Sassenrath

Peterson

M. B.

Petersen

M. B.

(2020). The emotional path to action: Empathy promotes physical distancing and wearing of face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychological Science, 31(11), 1363–1373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620964422

68.

Reniers

R. L.

Corcoran

Völlm

B. A.

Mashru

Howard

Liddle

P. F.

(2012). Moral decision-making, ToM, empathy and the default mode network. Biological Psychology, 90(3), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.03.009

69.

Rilling

J. K.

Sanfey

A. G. J.

(2011). The neuroscience of social decision-making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131647

70.

Rosen

J. B.

Brand

Kalbe

(2016). Empathy mediates the effects of age and sex on altruistic moral decision making. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 10, 67. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00067

71.

Samuelson

Zeckhauser

(1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1), 7–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00055564

72.

Sandy

Carolien

Evelien

Crone

E. A.

Berna

(2017). Assessing empathy across childhood and adolescence: Validation of the empathy questionnaire for children and adolescents (EmQue-CA). Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 870. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00870

73.

Séguin

J. R.

Arseneault

Tremblay

R. E.

(2007). The contribution of “cool” and “hot” components of decision-making in adolescence: Implications for developmental psychopathology. Cognitive Development, 22(4), 530–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2007.08.006

74.

Sierksma

Thijs

Verkuyten

(2014). Children’s intergroup helping: The role of empathy and peer group norms. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126(126), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.06.002

75.

Siu

A. M. H.

Shek

D. T. L.

(2005). Validation of the interpersonal reactivity Index in a Chinese context. Research on Social Work Practice, 15(2), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731504270384

76.

Spencer

S. J.

Logel

Davies

P. G.

(2016). Stereotype threat. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1), 415–437. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-073115-103235

77.

Stangor

Lange

J. E.

(1994). Mental representations of social-groups - advances in understanding stereotypes and stereotyping. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26(1), 357–416.

78.

Sun

Ping

Dan

(2018). Attentional characteristics of high-empathizers processing emotional stimuli and their eye-movement evidence. Journal of Psychological Science, 41(5), 1084–1089.

79.

Tappin

B. M.

McKay

R. T.

Abrams

(2017) Choosing the right level of analysis: Stereotypes shape social reality via collective action (40). Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

80.

Yiping

Zhong

Youlong

Zhan

Jin

Wei

Fan

(2017). Mechanisms of ethical decision making and intervention studies: The role of self-relevance and risk level. Advances in Psychological Science, 25(7), 1093–1102. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1042.2017.01093

81.

Yue

Tong

Xiting

Huang

(2016). Neurobiological basis of empathic traits. Advances in Psychological Science, 24(9), 1368–1376. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1042.2016.01368

82.

Ufkes

E. G.

Otten

Van

D. Z.

Giebels

Dovidio

J. F.

(2011). The effect of stereotype content on anger versus contempt in “day-to-day” conflicts. Group Processes Intergroup Relations, 15(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211417832

83.

Wei

Qingwang

Muzi

Xiaochen

Chen

(2018). Social class and social perception: Is warmth or competence more important? Acta Psychologica Sinica, 50(2), 243–252.

84.

Wiech

Kahane

Shackel

Farias

Savulescu

Tracey

(2013). Cold or calculating? Reduced activity in the subgenual cingulate cortex reflects decreased emotional aversion to harming in counterintuitive utilitarian judgment. Cognition, 126(3), 364–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.002

85.

Zhang

Liu

Wang

Luo

(2017). Mechanisms for attentional modulation by threatening emotions of fear, anger, and disgust. Cognitive, Affective, Behavioral Neuroscience, 17(1), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-016-0473-9