Oversharing on social media by adolescents is a considerable problem in the digital age, and has the potential to instigate online shaming, cyberbullying, identity theft, and other security risks. To date, oversharing has not been comprehensively studied and there is scarce understanding of the possible psychological conditions that may underlie this maladaptive online behavior. This study aimed to measure online oversharing and its potential psychological correlates among adolescents. Data were collected from 352 Iranian adolescent social media users (270 girls and 82 boys; Mage = 16.38, SD = 1.71). The Online Oversharing Inventory, developed for this study, demonstrated unidimensionality and excellent internal consistency. Further results showed that boys overshared significantly more on social media than girls did. Anxiety, attention-seeking, and social media addiction were significantly associated with elevated levels of online oversharing. Results show that the Online Oversharing Inventory is a brief and robust tool for the assessment of high frequency self-disclosure on social media. The findings suggest that anxiety, attention-seeking, and problematic use of social media may predispose adolescents to overshare personal information online.
AizenkotD. (2020). Social networking and online self-disclosure as predictors of cyberbullying victimization among children and youth. Children and Youth Services Review, 119(1), 105695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105695
3.
AlamN.AhmedO.NaherL.HiramoniF. A. (2021). The psychometric properties of Social Anxiety Scale for Adolescents (SAS-A) short form-Bangla. Heliyon, 7(8), Article e07801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07801
4.
AmiriS.JamaliY. (2019). Psychometric properties of brief histrionic personality symptoms scale among Iranian students. Journal of Research & Health, 9(5), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.29252/jrh.9.5.411
5.
AmpongG.MensahA.AduA.AddaeJ. A.OmoregieO. K.OforiK. S. (2018). Examining self-disclosure on social networking sites: A flow theory and privacy perspective. Behavioral Sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 8(6), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8060058
6.
AndreassenC. S.PallesenS.GriffithsM. D. (2017). The relationship between addictive use of social media, narcissism, and self-esteem: Findings from a large national survey. Addictive Behaviors, 64, 287–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.03.006
7.
BányaiF.ZsilaÁ.KirályO.MarazA.ElekesZ.GriffithsM. D.AndreassenC. S.DemetrovicsZ. (2017). Problematic social media use: Results from a large-scale nationally representative adolescent sample. PLoS One, 12(1), Article e0169839. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169839
BentlerP. M.BonnetD. C. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
10.
BrakeD. R. (2014). Sharing our lives online: Risks and exposure in social media. Palgrave Macmillan.
11.
BrandM.YoungK. S.LaierC.WölflingK.PotenzaM. N. (2016). Integrating psychological and neurobiological considerations regarding the development and maintenance of specific Internet-use disorders: An interaction of person-affect-cognition-execution (I-PACE) model. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 71, 252–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.033
12.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage.
13.
ChanT. K.CheungC. M.LeeZ. W. (2020). Cyberbullying on social networking sites: A literature review and future research directions. Information & Management, 58(2), 103411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103411
14.
CheungC.LeeZ. W. Y.ChanT. K. H. (2015). Self-disclosure in social networking sites: The role of perceived cost, perceived benefits and social influence. Internet Research, 25(2), 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-09-2013-0192
15.
ComreyA. L.LeeH. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Lawrence Eribaum Associates.
de WinterJ. C.DodouD.WieringaP. A. (2009). Exploratory factor analysis with small sample sizes. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44(2), 147–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170902794206
18.
EisingaR.GrotenhuisM.PelzerB. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?International Journal of Public Health, 58(4), 637–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3
19.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
20.
FeißtM.HennigsA.HeilJ.MoosbruggerH.KelavaA.StolpnerI.KieserM.RauchG. (2019). Refining scores based on patient reported outcomes - statistical and medical perspectives. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1), 167. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0806-9
21.
FergusonC. J.NegyC. (2014). Development of a brief screening questionnaire for histrionic personality symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 124–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.029
22.
FuQ.Rodríguez-ArduraI.Meseguer-ArtolaA.WuP. (2022). Self-disclosure during the COVID-19 emergency: Effects of narcissism traits, time perspective, virtual presence, and hedonic gratification. Computers in Human Behavior, 130, 107154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107154
GreeffM. (2013). Disclosure and stigma: A cultural perspective. In LiamputtongP. (Ed.), Stigma, discrimination and living with HIV/AIDS: A cross-cultural perspective (pp. 71–95). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6324-1_5
25.
GreenT.WilhelmsenT.WilmotsE.DoddB.QuinnS. (2016). Social anxiety, attributes of online communication and self-disclosure across private and public Facebook communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 206–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.066
26.
GuedesE.SancassianiF.CartaM. G.CamposC.MachadoS.KingA. L. S.NardiA. E. (2016). Internet addiction and excessive social networks use: What about Facebook?Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, 12(1), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.2174/1745017901612010043
27.
HajliN.LinX. (2016). Exploring the security of information sharing on social networking sites: The role of perceived control of information. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2346-x
28.
HawkS. T.van den EijndenR. J.van LissaC. J.terBogtT. F. (2019). Narcissistic adolescents’ attention-seeking following social rejection: Links with social media disclosure, problematic social media use, and smartphone stress. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.032
29.
HayesA. f.CouttsJ. J. (2020). Use omega rather than cronbach’s alpha for estimating reliability. But…. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629
30.
IBM Corp. Released (2017). IBM SPSS Statistics for windows, version 25.0. IBM Corp.
31.
İbrahimoğluÖ.MersinS.AçıkgözG.ÇağlarM.AkyolE.ÖzkanB.ÖnerÖ. (2022). Self-disclosure, empathy and anxiety in nurses. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 58(2), 724–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12842
32.
KanwalS.ChongR.PitafiA. H.NawazH. (2018). Effects of social networking sites (SNS) addiction on online self-disclosure behavior: Impact of psychological factors. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(2), 31–39.https://www.ikppress.org/index.php/AJAHSS/article/view/4293
33.
KennedyJ. (2018). Oversharing is the norm. In DobsonA.RobardsB.CarahN. (Eds.) Digital intimate publics and social media. Palgrave studies in communication for social change. Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
KlimmtC.BrandM. (2017). Permanence of online access and Internet addiction. In VordererP.HefnerD.ReineckeL.KlimmtC. (Eds.), Permanently online, permanently connected (pp. 61–71). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315276472-7
35.
KlineR. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.), Guilford Publications.
36.
KrasnovaH.VeltriN. F.&GüntherO. (2012). Self-disclosure and privacy calculus on social networking sites: The role of culture. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 4(3), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-012-0216-6
37.
KyriazosT. A. (2018). Applied psychometrics: Sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psychology, 9(8), 2207–2231. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.98126
38.
LinC. Y.BroströmA.NilsenP.GriffithsM. D.PakpourA. H. (2017). Psychometric validation of the persian bergen social media addiction scale using classic test theory and Rasch models. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 6(4), 620–629. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.6.2017.071
39.
LuoM.HancockJ. T. (2020). Self-disclosure and social media: Motivations, mechanisms and psychological well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 110–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.019
40.
MasaviruM. (2016). Self-disclosure: Theories and model review. Journal of Culture, Society and Development, 18(1), 43–44.
41.
MohammadkhaniP.DobsonK. S.AmiriM.GhafariF. H. (2010). Psychometric properties of the brief symptom inventory in a sample of recovered Iranian depressed patients. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 10(3), 541–551.
42.
MolaviP.MikaeiliN.GhaseminejadM. A.KazemiZ.PourdonyaM. (2018). Social anxiety and benign and toxic online self-disclosures: An investigation into the role of rejection sensitivity, self-regulation, and internet addiction in college students. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 206(8), 598–605. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000000855
43.
MorgadoF.MeirelesJ.NevesC. M.AmaralA.FerreiraM. (2017). Scale development: Ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices. Psicologia, reflexao e critica: revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS, 30(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-016-0057-1
44.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1967). Psychometric theory (Vol. 226). McGraw-Hill.
45.
OstendorfS.MüllerS. M.BrandM. (2020). Neglecting long-term risks: Self-Disclosure on social media and its relation to individual decision-making tendencies and problematic social-networks-use. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 543388. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.543388
PirdehghanA.KhezmehE.PanahiS. (2021). Social media use and sleep disturbance among adolescents: A cross-sectional study. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry, 16(2): 137–145. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijps.v16i2.5814
48.
PitafiA. H.KanwalS.KhanA. N. (2020). Effects of perceived ease of use on SNSs-addiction through psychological dependence, habit: The moderating role of perceived usefulness. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 33(3), 383–407. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbis.2020.105831
49.
PrimackB. A.ShensaA.Escobar-VieraC. G.BarrettE. L.SidaniJ. E.ColditzJ. B.JamesA. E. (2017). Use of multiple social media platforms and symptoms of depression and anxiety: A nationally-representative study among US young adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.013
50.
RadovicA.GmelinT.SteinB. D.MillerE. (2017). Depressed adolescents’ positive and negative use of social media. Journal of Adolescence, 55(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.12.002
51.
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
52.
RoseC. (2011). The security implications of ubiquitous social media. International Journal of Management & Information Systems (IJMIS), 15(1), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.19030/ijmis.v15i1.1593
53.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
54.
SmithS. A.ColeS. A. (2013). MyMoralPanic: Adolescents, social networking, and child sex crime panic. In KrinskyC. (Eds.), The ashgate research companion to moral panics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315613307.ch11
55.
SprecherS.HendrickS. S. (2004). Self-disclosure in intimate relationships: Associations with individual and relationship characteristics over time. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(6), 857–877. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.6.857.54803
ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ. (2007). Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.267
58.
ValkenburgP. M.SchoutenA. P.PeterJ. (2005). Adolescents’ identity experiments on the internet. New Media & Society, 7(3), 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444805052282
59.
ValkenburgP. M.SumterS. R.PeterJ. (2011). Gender differences in online and offline self-disclosure in pre-adolescence and adolescence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29(2), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1348/2044-835X.002001
60.
VijayakumarN.PfeiferJ. H. (2020). Self-disclosure during adolescence: Exploring the means, targets, and types of personal exchanges. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.005
WeidmanA. C.FernandezK. C.LevinsonC. A.AugustineA. A.LarsenR. J.RodebaughT. L. (2012). Compensatory internet use among individuals higher in social anxiety and its implications for well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(3), 191–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.03.003
63.
WestR.TurnerL. (2010). Introducing communication theory; Analysis and application (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill International Edition.
