Socio-Economic and Cultural Context in the Development of Early Mathematical Competencies: A Comparative Study of Specific Educational Contexts in Chile and Spain

Abstract

This research presents the findings of a comparative study of mathematical competence among 130 students (M = 54.08 months; SD = 2.57) from vulnerable school contexts in Chile and the Spanish public school system. The study analyses a set of general and specific domain precursors for which evidence of socioeconomic background exists. Using multivariate regression and discriminant analysis techniques, we calculated similarities and differences between groups by comparing these precursors. Significant differences were found between the Spanish and Chilean groups (p < .05); however, no differences were observed in non-symbolic comparison and receptive vocabulary. Possible reasons for the existence and extent of these differences are discussed in terms of socio-cultural and educational contexts.

Keywords

mathematical competence socioeconomic context general domain precursors specific domain precursors academic skills

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aguilar

Aragón

Navarro

J. I.

(2019). Componentes cognitivos del sistema de aproximación numérica y la fluidez de cálculo en niños de educación primaria. Universitas Psychologica, 18(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy18-3.ccsa

Aragón

Cerda

Aguilar

Mera

Navarro

J. I.

(2020). Modulation of general and specific cognitive precursors to early mathematical competencies in preschool children. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(2), 405-422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00483-4.

Aragón

Cerda

Delgado

Aguilar

Navarro

J. I.

(2019). Individual differences in general and specific cognitive precursors in early mathematical learning. Psicothema, 31(2), 156–162. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.306

Aunio

Räsänen

(2016). Core numerical skills for learning mathematics in children aged five to eight years–A working model for educators. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24(5), 684–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2014.996424

Barnes

M. A.

Clemens

N. H.

Fall

A. M.

Roberts

Klein

Starkey

McCandliss

Zucker

Flynn

(2020). Cognitive predictors of difficulties in math and reading in pre-kindergarten children at high risk for learning disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(4), 685. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000404

Bautista-Galeano

L. C.

del Río-Hernández

Susperreguy-Jorquera

(2018). Qué hacen las educadoras de párvulos para enseñar matemáticas? Un estudio en salas chilenas. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía, 70(3), 45–60. doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2018.63132

Betancur

Votruba-Drzal

Schunn

(2018). Socioeconomic gaps in science achievement. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0132-5

Breton

T. R.

(2021). The role of national culture in student acquisition of mathematics and reading skills. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1870100

Bugden

DeWind

N. K.

Brannon

E. M.

(2016). Using cognitive training studies to unravel the mechanisms by which the approximate number system supports symbolic math ability. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 10(1), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.05.002.

10.

Claessens

Engel

(2013). How important is where you start? Early mathematics knowledge and later school success. Teachers College Record, 115(6), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500603

11.

Clark

C. A. C.

Nelson

J. M.

Garza

Sheffield

T. D.

Wiebe

S. A.

Espy

K. A.

(2014). Gaining control: Changing relations between executive control and processing speed and their relevance for mathematics achievement over course of the preschool period. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00107.

12.

Coddington

C. H.

Mistry

R. S.

Bailey

A. L.

(2014). Socioeconomic status and receptive vocabulary development: Replication of the parental investment model with Chilean preschoolers and their families. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(4), 538–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.06.004

13.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge Academic.

14.

Cortés-Pascual

Moyano-Muñoz

Quilez-Robres

(2019). The relationship between executive functions and academic performance in primary education: review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(1), 1582. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01582.

15.

Costa

H. M.

Nicholson

Donlan

Van Herwegen

(2018). Low performance on mathematical tasks in preschoolers: The importance of domain‐general and domain‐specific abilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 62(4), 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12465

16.

Eason

S. H.

Scalise

N. R.

Berkowitz

Ramani

G. B.

Levine

S. C.

(2020). Reviewing the family math literature. https://education-first.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/FamilyMathReview_WhitePaper.pdf

17.

Elliott

Bachman

H. J.

(2018). SES disparities in early math abilities: The contributions of parents’ math cognitions, practices to support math, and math talk. Developmental Review, 49(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2018.08.001.

18.

Eriksson

(2017). The Swedish communicative development inventory III: Parent reports on language in preschool children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41(5), 647–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025416644078

19.

Esping-Andersen

Garfinkel

Han

W.-J.

Magnuson

Wagner

Waldfogel

(2012). Child care and school performance in Denmark and the United States. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(3), 576–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.10.010

20.

Fawcett

A. J.

Nicholson

(2013). DST-J. Test para la Detección de la Dislexia en Niños. [DST-J. The dyslexia screening test – junior. TEA.

21.

Fazio

L. K.

Bailey

D. H.

Thompson

C. A.

Siegler

R. S.

(2014). Relations of different types of numerical magnitude representations to each other and to mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 123(1), 53-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.01.013.

22.

Feigenson

Libertus

M. E.

Halberda

(2013). Links between the intuitive sense of number and formal mathematics ability. Child Development Perspectives, 7(2), 74–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12019

23.

Fundación Integra (2020). Reporte 2019 Fundación Integra. https://www.integra.cl/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Reporte2019_Fundacion_Integra.pdf

24.

Garon-Carrier

Boivin

Lemelin

J. P.

Kovas

Parent

Séguin

Dionne

(2018). Early developmental trajectories of number knowledge and math achievement from 4 to 10 years: Low-persistent profile and early-life predictors. Journal of School Psychology, 68(1), 84-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.02.004.

25.

Gilmore

C. K.

McCarthy

S. E.

Spelke

E. S.

(2010). Non-symbolic arithmetic abilities and mathematics achievement in the first year of formal schooling. Cognition, 115(3), 394–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.02.002

26.

Ginsburg

Baroody

A. J.

del Río

M. C. N.

Guerra

I. L.

(2007). TEMA-3: Test de Competencia matemática básica [Test of early mathematics ability]. TEA.

27.

Goldrine

Estrella

Olfos

Cáceres

Galdames

Hernández

Medina

(2015). Conocimiento para la enseñanza del número en futuras educadoras de párvulos: efecto de un curso de didáctica de la matemática. Estudios Pedagógicos, 41(1), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052015000100006

28.

Gubbins

Otero

(2020). Parental involvement and low-SES children’s academic achievement in early elementary school: New evidence from Chile. Educational Studies, 46(5), 548–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1620691

29.

Guzmán

Rodríguez

Ferreira

R. A.

(2021). Longitudinal performance in basic numerical skills mediates the relationship between socio-economic status and mathematics anxiety: Evidence from Chile. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(1), 3983. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.611395.

30.

Hascoët

Giaconi

Jamain

(2020). Family socioeconomic status and parental expectations affect mathematics achievement in a national sample of Chilean students. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 45(2), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025420965731

31.

Hutchison

J. E.

Ansari

Zheng

De Jesus

Lyons

I. M.

(2020). The relation between subitizable symbolic and non‐symbolic number processing over the kindergarten school year. Developmental Science, 23(2), Article e12884. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12884

32.

Johansson

Strietholt

(2019). Globalised student achievement? A longitudinal and cross-country analysis of convergence in mathematics performance. Comparative Education, 55(4), 536–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2019.1657711

33.

John

A. M. S.

Kibbe

Tarullo

A. R.

(2019). A systematic assessment of socioeconomic status and executive functioning in early childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 178(1), 352-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.09.003.

34.

Jordan

N. C.

Levine

S. C.

(2009). Socioeconomic variation, number competence, and mathematics learning difficulties in young children. Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 15(1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddrr.46

35.

Lee

Md-Yunus

(2015). Investigating children’s abilities to count and make quantitative comparisons. Early Childhood Education Journal, 44(3), 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0707-4

36.

LeFevre

J.-A.

Fast

Skwarchuk

S.-L.

Smith-Chant

B. L.

Bisanz

Kamawar

Penner-Wilger

(2010). Pathways to mathematics: longitudinal predictors of performance. Child Development, 81(6), 1753–1767. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01508.x

37.

Leffel

Suskind

(2013). Parent-directed approaches to enrich the early language environments of children living in poverty. Seminars in Speech and Language, 34(4), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1353443

38.

Liu

Chung

K. K. H.

McBride

(2016). The role of SES in Chinese (L1) and English (L2) word reading in Chinese-speaking kindergarteners. Journal of Research in Reading, 39(3), 268–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12046

39.

Mackintosh

B. B.

Rowe

(2021). Baseline inequalities: Social skills at preschool entry moderate math development. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 35(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2020.1728446

40.

Mendive

Mascareño-Lara

Aldoney

Pérez

J. C.

Pezoa

J. P.

(2020). Home language and literacy environments and early literacy trajectories of low‐socioeconomic status Chilean children. Child Development, 91(6), 2042–2062. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13382

41.

Merkley

Ansari

(2016). Why numerical symbols count in the development of mathematical skills: evidence from brain and behavior. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 10(4), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.04.006.

42.

MEYFP (2019). Sistema estatal de indicadores de la educación 2019. Secretaría General Técnica. http://www.educacionyfp.gob.es/dam/jcr:627dc544-8413-4df1-ae46-558237bf6829/seie-2019.pdf

43.

MINEDUC (2013). Resultados evaluación inicia 2012. http://www.mineduc.cl/usuarios/mineduc/doc/201308221629100.RESULTADOS_EVALUACION_INICIA.pdf

44.

Moore

A. M.

vanMarle

Geary

D. C.

(2016). Kindergartners’ fluent processing of symbolic numerical magnitude is predicted by their cardinal knowledge and implicit understanding of arithmetic 2 years earlier. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 150(10), 31-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.05.003.

45.

Nguyen

Watts

T. W.

Duncan

G. J.

Clements

D. H.

Sarama

J. S.

Wolfe

Spitler

M. E.

(2016). Which preschool mathematics competencies are most predictive of fifth grade achievement? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36(3), 550-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECRESQ.2016.02.003.

46.

Nosworthy

Bugden

Archibald

Evans

Ansari

(2013). A two-minute paper-and-pencil test of symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing explains variability in primary school children’s arithmetic competence. PloS one, 8(7), Article e67918. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067918

47.

OECD (2018). Skills in ibero-America insights from PISA 2015.

48.

Olmeda-García

(2015). Nivel socioeconómico y rendimiento académico: Estudiantes resilientes . Tesis doctoral. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. https://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/38862/1/T37677.pdf

49.

Ormeño

Rodríguez

Bustos

(2013). Dificultades que presentan las educadoras de párvulos para desarrollar el pensamiento lógico matemático en los niveles de transición. Páginas de Educación, 6(2), 55–71.

50.

Passolunghi

M. C.

Lanfranchi

Altoè

Sollazzo

(2015). Early numerical abilities and cognitive skills in kindergarten children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 135(1), 25-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.02.001.

51.

Peng

Fuchs

(2016). A meta-analysis of working memory deficits in children with learning difficulties: Is there a difference between verbal domain and numerical domain? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414521667

52.

Peng

Wang

Namkung

(2018). Understanding the cognition related to mathematics difficulties: A meta-analysis on the cognitive deficit profiles and the bottleneck theory. Review of Educational Research, 88(3), 434–476. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317753350

53.

Raghubar

K. P.

Barnes

M. A.

(2017). Early numeracy skills in preschool-aged children: A review of neurocognitive findings and implications for assessment and intervention. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(2), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2016.1259387

54.

Ramsook

K. A.

Welsh

J. A.

Bierman

K. L.

(2020). What you say, and how you say it: Preschoolers’ growth in vocabulary and communication skills differentially predict kindergarten academic achievement and self‐regulation. Social Development, 29(3), 783–800. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12425

55.

Rittle‐Johnson

Fyfe

E. R.

Hofer

K. G.

Farran

D. C.

(2017). Early math trajectories: Low‐income children's mathematics knowledge from ages 4 to 11. Child Development, 88(5), 1727–1742. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12662

56.

Sasanguie

Göbel

S. M.

Moll

Smets

Reynvoet

(2013). Approximate number sense, symbolic number processing, or number–space mappings: What underlies mathematics achievement? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114(3), 418–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.012

57.

Scalise

N. R.

Daubert

E. N.

Ramani

G. B.

(2018). Narrowing the early mathematics gap: A play-based intervention to promote low-income preschoolers’ number skills. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 3(3), 559–581. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v3i3.72

58.

Schneider

Beeres

Coban

Merz

Schmidt

Stricker

De Smedt

(2017). Associations of non‐symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitude processing with mathematical competence: A meta‐analysis. Developmental Science, 20(3), Article e12372. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12372

59.

Sepúlveda

Rodríguez

Peake

(2020). Differences and associations in symbolic and non-symbolic early numeracy competencies of Chilean kinder grade children, considering socioeconomic status of schools. Early Education and Development, 31(1), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2019.1609819

60.

Shahaeian

Wang

Tucker-Drob

Geiger

Bus

A. G.

Harrison

L. J.

(2018). Early shared reading, socioeconomic status, and children’s cognitive and school competencies: Six years of longitudinal evidence. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(6), 485–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1482901

61.

Siegler

R. S.

Lortie‐Forgues

(2014). An integrative theory of numerical development. Child Development Perspectives, 8(3), 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12077

62.

Slates

S. L.

Alexander

K. L.

Entwisle

D. R.

Olson

L. S.

(2012). Counteracting summer slide: Social capital resources within socio-economically disadvantaged families. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 17(3), 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2012.688171

63.

Toll

S. W.

Van Viersen

Kroesbergen

E. H.

Van Luit

J. E.

(2015). The development of (non-) symbolic comparison skills throughout kindergarten and their relations with basic mathematical skills. Learning and Individual Differences, 38(1), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.12.006.

64.

Valenzuela

J. P.

Bellei

De los Rios

(2014). Socioeconomic school segregation in a market-oriented educational system. The case of Chile. Journal of Education Policy, 29(2), 217–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2013.806995

65.

Vanbinst

Ceulemans

Peters

Ghesquière

De Smedt

(2018). Developmental trajectories of children’s symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills and associated cognitive competencies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 166(1), 232-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.08.008.

66.

Vanbinst

Ghesquière

De Smedt

(2015). Does numerical processing uniquely predict first graders’ future development of single-digit arithmetic? Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.12.004

67.

Vera

G. G.

Valenzuela

J. P.

Sotomayor

(2015). Against all odds: Outstanding reading performance among Chilean youth in vulnerable conditions. Comparative Education Review, 59(4), 693–716. doi:10.1086/683108

68.

Wasik

B. A.

Hindman

A. H.

(2020). Increasing preschoolers’ vocabulary development through a streamlined teacher professional development intervention. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 50(1), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.11.001

69.

Wechsler

(2009). WPPSI-III, Escala de Inteligencia de Wechsler para Preescolar y primaria–III. [Wechsler Preschool and primary Scale of intelligence-III]. TEA.

70.

Liu

(2020). Examining sociocultural factors in assessing vocabulary knowledge of children from low socio-economic background. Early Child Development and Care, 191(15), 2396–2406. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2019.1711375

71.

Zhang

(2016). Linking language, visual-spatial, and executive function skills to number competence in very young Chinese children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36(3), 178-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.12.010.