Trust is an important correlate of well-being, and it plays an important moderating role against adversity. But does this conclusion also hold during pandemics? We address this question by investigating the role of interpersonal and institutional trust for well-being, as measured by five proxies, during the COVID-19 pandemic in Serbia. We also examined age and gender differences in the relationship between trust and well-being, and tested the protective role of trust among individuals whose well-being might be at risk during the pandemic. The sample included a total of 5776 Serbian adults (Mage = 37.00 years, 75% female). The results showed that interpersonal trust has a small but significant relationship with well-being, whereas institutional trust has negligible effects. We also found some evidence for the protective role of general interpersonal trust on well-being among individuals with poorer self-rated health and in a poorer financial situation. Our findings confirm the role of interpersonal trust for well-being in times of crisis, and support previous evidence indicating that promoting interpersonal trust should be a core goal of public policy.
ArampatziE.BurgerM. J.StavropoulosS.Van OortF. G. (2019). Subjective well-being and the 2008 recession in European regions: The moderating role of quality of governance. International Journal of Community Well-Being, 2(2), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-019-00022-0
2.
BartoliniS.PiekalkiewiczM.SarracinoF. (2019). A Social Cure for Social Comparisons. Department of Economics University of Siena797. Department of Economics, University of Siena.
3.
BellD. N.BlanchflowerD. G. (2020). US and UK labour markets before and during the Covid-19 crash. National Institute Economic Review, 252, R52–R69. https://doi.org/10.1017/nie.2020.14
4.
BelleD. (1987). Gender differences in the social moderators of stress. In BarnettR. C.BienerL.BaruchG. K. (Eds.), Gender and stress (pp. 257–277). Free Press.
5.
BowlingA. (2005). Just one question: If one question works, why ask several?Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 59(5), 342–345. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.021204
6.
CacioppoJ. T.ReisH. T.ZautraA. J. (2011). Social resilience: The value of social fitness with an application to the military. American Psychologist, 66(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021419
7.
CalvoR.ZhengY.KumarS.OlgiatiA.BerkmanL. (2012). Well-being and social capital on planet earth: cross-national evidence from 142 countries. Plos One, 7(8), e42793. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042793
8.
CheungC. K.TseJ. W. L. (2008). Institutional trust as a determinant of anxiety during the SARS crisis in Hong Kong. Social Work in Public Health, 23(5), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/19371910802053224
9.
Delle FaveA. (2014). Well-being in times of crisis: Interdisciplinary evidence and policy implications. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(1), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9499-2
10.
DemakakosP.NazrooJ.BreezeE.MarmotM. (2008). Socioeconomic status and health: The role of subjective social status. Social Science & Medicine, 67(2), 330–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.038
11.
DienerE.WirtzD.TovW.Kim-PrietoC.ChoiD.-W.OishiS.Biswas-DienerR. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
12.
EconomouM.MadianosM.PeppouL.E.SouliotisK.PatelakisA.StefanisC. (2014). Cognitive social capital and mental illness during economic crisis: a nationwide population-based study in Greece. Social Science & Medicine, 100, 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.006
13.
Eurofound. (2019). Life and society in the EU candidate countries, European Quality of Life 2016 series. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
14.
GheorghiuM. A.VignolesV. L.SmithP. B. (2009). Beyond the United States and Japan: Testing Yamagishi’s emancipation theory of trust across 31 nations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72(4), 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250907200408
15.
GlatzC.EderA. (2020). Patterns of trust and subjective well-being across Europe: New insights from repeated cross-sectional analyses based on the European Social Survey 2002-2016. Social Indicators Research, 148(2), 417–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02212-x
16.
GonzaG.BurgerA. (2017). Subjective well-being during the 2008 economic crisis: Identification of mediating and moderating factors. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(6), 1763–1797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9797-y
17.
HelliwellJ. F.HuangH.WangS. (2014). Social capital and well-being in times of crisis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(1), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9441-z
18.
HelliwellJ.F.HuangH.WangS. (2018). New evidence on trust and well-being. In UslanerE. M. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Political and Social Trust (pp. 409–446). Oxford University Press.
19.
HommerichC. (2012). Trust and subjective well-being after the Great East Japan Earthquake, Tsunami and nuclear meltdown: Preliminary results. International Journal of Japanese Sociology, 21(1), 46–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6781.2012.01169.x
20.
JoshanlooM.JovanovićV. (2021). Subjective health in relation to hedonic and eudaimonic well-being: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. Journal of Health Psychology, 26(3), 438–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105318820104
21.
JovanovićV. (2016). Trust and subjective well-being: The case of Serbia. Personality and Individual Differences, 98(4), 284–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.061
22.
JovanovićV.LazićM. (2020). Is longer always better? A comparison of the validity of single-item versus multiple-item measures of life satisfaction. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 15(3), 675–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-018-9680-6
23.
JovanovićV.LazićM.Gavrilov-JerkovićV. (2020, September 25-26). Development and validation of an ultra-brief measure of depression and anxiety (DAS-8) [Paper presentation]. 16th Days of AppliedPsychology: Faculty of Philosophy, University of Niš, Serbia.
24.
LeeC. -Y. S.GoldsteinS. E.DikB. J. (2018). The relational context of social support in young adults: Links with stress and well-being. Journal of Adult Development, 25(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.577684
25.
LiT.FungH. H. (2013). Age differences in trust: An investigation across 38 countries. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68(3), 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs072
26.
LindströmM.GiordanoG. N. (2016). The 2008 financial crisis: Changes in social capital and its association with psychological wellbeing in the United Kingdom - A panel study. Social Science & Medicine, 153, 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.02.008
27.
LovibondS. H.LovibondP. F. (1995). Manual for the Depression anxiety stress scales (2nd ed.). Psychology Foundation.
Navarro-CarrilloG.Valor-SeguraI.LozanoL. M.MoyaM. (2018). Do economic crises always undermine trust in others? The case of generalized, interpersonal, and in-group trust. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1955. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01955
30.
OECD. (2001). The well-being of nations: The role of human and social capital. OECD.
31.
PoulinM. J.HaaseC. M. (2015). Growing to trust: Evidence that trust increases and becomes moreimportant for well-being across the life span. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(6), 614–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615574301
32.
SarracinoF.PiekałkiewiczM. (2021). The role of income and social capital for Europeans’ well-being during the 2008 economic crisis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(4), 1583–1610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00285-x
33.
SibleyC. G. (2008). Utilities for examining interactions in multiple regression [Computer software]. Auckland: University of Auckland.
34.
SønderskovK. M.DinesenP. T. (2016). Trusting the state, trusting each other? The effect of institutional trust on social trust. Political Behavior, 38(1), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9322-8
35.
TokudaY.JimbaM.YanaiH.FujiiS.InoguchiT. (2008). Interpersonal trust and quality-of-life: A cross-sectional study in Japan. Plos One, 3(12), e3985. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003985
36.
ToralesJ.O’HigginsM.Castaldelli-MaiaJ. M.VentriglioA. (2020). The outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus and its impact on global mental health. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 66(4), 317–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764020915212
37.
VerducciS.SchröerA. (2010). Social trust. In AnheierH. K.ToeplerS. (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Civil Society (pp. 1453–1458). Springer.
38.
WilliamsV. F.SmithA. A.VillantiA. C.RathJ. M.HairE. C.CantrellJ.LyubovT.ValloneD. M. (2017). Validity of a subjective financial situation measure to assesssocioeconomic status in US young adults. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 23(5), 487–495. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000468
39.
YamamuraE.TsutsuiY.YamaneC.YamaneS.PowdthaveeN. (2015). Trust and happiness: Comparative study before and after the Great East Japan Earthquake. Social Indicators Research, 123(3), 919–935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0767-7
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
